Why should I give a flipping fuck what this dude, or anyone else like him, has to say? What makes any of these non-divine opinionators necessary for my attention?

>man with moustache said-
>social outcast from two thousand years ago said-
I don't give a fuck.

Who said you had to read Nietzche and why were you retarded enough to listen? Either you're magically drawn to him because it's time or you're not.

do not read

>>24542357 (OP)
It's ok if it werent over your head. It's why everybody knows his name and you're just you.

you don't. most of these german spergs were obscure in their time, or cult figures. nietzsche's influence was limited to adolf hitler and the early settler zionists - charming stuff - and would've been virtually unknown in the english-speaking world if not for monty python

>>24542357 (OP)
No one cares if you do or you don't. Enjoy your early checkout. The eternal truth motels always have vacancies.

>>24542357 (OP)
because his Genealogy of morals and will to power had great influence on Modern Thinkers

>>24542357 (OP)
once you understand that you are not the target audience you'll stop asking such dumb questions

>>24542357 (OP)
why should we care about what you say, either?

>>24542881
Syntactical error; I never claimed that I should be heeded, nor did I present any ideas. I was merely challenging others. Perhaps that's what philosophers do, perhaps they don't. I don't give a fuck.

>>24542357 (OP)
Why should you care what anyone has to say? Why should you even care about anything at all? You seem to be tilted specifically against Nietzsche, one of the most influential philosophers of the modern world, either because you tried reading him, couldn't understand, and resorted to aggression to redirect; or because you truly have no interest in philosophy but feel a social pressure to be well-versed in it (which, at the very least, shows you care what other people think).

I'll say you should read Nietzsche (and philosophy in general) if you lack an ability for self-illusion and are old enough (and mature enough) to start asking yourself the truly difficult questions in life. Too many people live their lives never wondering why, lose their sense of purpose at 40 and kill themselves having never truly lived their own life, but the life that someone else prescribed for them. If there is but one thing of value in philosophy, it's to learn to shatter the unseen ideological shackles that society imposes by its very nature.

>>24542357 (OP)
Don't worry, he's not for retards.

>>24542945
>Syntactical error
Don't you fucking dare.Don't you even try throwing "syntax error" at me. I don't want to hear a single person ever say the phrase "syntax error" again. I swear to God, if you try to put, if you try to actually look at me and say fucking "syntax", if you say the word syntax, I am going to fucking kill you. Do you understand? I'm going to fucking kill you.

>>24542357 (OP)
>What makes any of these non-divine opinionators necessary for my attention?
why should you care about divine opinionators (?) then?

Yet another religiontard filtered by Nietzsche, and this time without even reading one sentence of him. His mere aura is enough to drive the Christcuck into a posture of intellectual surrender.

>>24542357 (OP)
>man with beard said-
>social outcast from two thousand years ago said-
jews are the best also you should be a cuck and love brown people

>>24542357 (OP)
You shouldn't. Not Nietzsche, nor anyone else like him, nor anyone else unlike him.
Philosophers lilke to larp about the search for truth, but philosophy is not a science, it's an art - and it is appropriately discussed in /lit/, not in /g/ or /sci/.
So, if you know you like someone's ideas read them. If you don't know who you like but do know who you dislike, read them, that will help you understand what about them you dislike exactly and this way find who you like.

>>24544218
Because they're divine.

If the creator of the world wants something to happen, why does he (or she) need to send a letter to us in order to command us?
If the creator of the world doesn't want something to happen, why is it even possible?

The bible prohibits things like homosexuality, which makes sense in the context of some cultures.

In the Epistel to the Romans, it states:
>(Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature things required by the law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law.
>15 They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their
>consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them.)
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%202%2C14&version=NIV

The story of the lost paradise makes no sense otherwise. It is taught that humankind gains the faculty to judge good and evil from the forbidden fruit. Assuming this is the truth, what does that even mean if humans still need instructions like the Bible to judge whether something is evil or not?

/thread