What happened to Jesus between his death and resurrection? any books that explain that?

>>24545353 (OP)
He was dead

>>24545353 (OP)
He got God

This is addressed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, which is free online here: https://www.usccb.org/sites/default/files/flipbooks/catechism/166/
In essence, Jesus went to Sheol to save some of the souls hanging out there.

>>24545353 (OP)
Gospel of Nicodemus

>>24545353 (OP)
Jesus had short hair, you blaspheme Christ and make Jesus a sinner by teaching he dishonored the Father with your idols. As with the other poster I'm replying to, you care more about tradition than what the Bible actually says.

>>24545372
>the Catechism of the Catholic Church
The Catholic Talmud, making the word of God of none effect by their traditions.

>>24545353 (OP)
He was in Hell

>>24546986
weak bait

>>24547000
The only weak thing here is Catholic apologetics.

You NPCs are literally told to "trust the experts" and when someone challenges you, you get cognitive dissonance and declare anyone who can think for themselves is a troll. It's pathetic.

>>24547015
someone who genuinely believes this dying-off form of angry fundamentalist protestantism would not be posting on 4chan. but i've dealt with this kind of monkey protestantism for years. you arent gonna get a rise out of me. i shall not cast pearls before swine

Weekend in Magaluf

>>24547071
Still no real arguments, Cathodox LARPers can't contend for the faith and they don't even pretend to contend for the faith; they departed from the faith from the inception of their counterfeit Christianity. All they have are brainwashed talking points about one twisted verse from the Bible implying that justifies their anti-Biblical practices, or they have their revisionist history after their cult went around burning countless books and people (and even burning Bibles too).

Literally all you did was prove my point about your cognitive dissonance. Plus you type like a fag with your all-lowercase hipster faggotry, but that's par for the course with how effeminate Mary-worshipping Catholicism is, that's why you love to depict Christ in a dress and with long women's hair, and why your priests love to wear dresses, and why you love to bow to a statue of a woman in the first place like a simp/cuck/beta.

You're so boring. Don't forget to buy some indulgences. And hey, if you follow the Poope on twitter, you might even get less time in purgatory! What a joke your religion is.

>>24545353 (OP) ACIM does not dwell on the timeline between the crucifixion and resurrection. What matters is not what happened to the body of Jesus but what the crucifixion and resurrection mean to the mind. The crucifixion was a demonstration not of suffering, but of the power of forgiveness and non-attack. He chose to show that the body is not the Self and that even extreme violence cannot touch what you truly are. The resurrection represents the awakening of the mind to the truth, that there is no death, no sin, and no separation from God. In The Song of Prayer, a supplement to the Course, it's hinted that resurrection was not about a body coming back, but about transcending the entire belief in death.

The Course deliberately avoids any historical or physical detail. Why? Because the mind that still thinks it's a body will miss the point entirely.

What matters is not what happened to him, but what the crucifixion and resurrection symbolize in your own mind.
Crucifixion = The ego’s final attack, your belief in guilt and sacrifice.
Resurrection = The release of guilt, the undoing of death, and the return to God.

Jesus didn’t suffer. He didn’t die. He demonstrated eternal life, and ACIM calls you to follow him, not into a tomb, but into the resurrection of your mind.