Anonymous
7/13/2025, 7:59:47 AM No.24545421
>"the bible is all a man needs to understand god"
>has a bookshelf full of other people's interpretations and guides
>has a bookshelf full of other people's interpretations and guides
Replies:
Thread 24545421 - /lit/ [Archived: 345 hours ago]
Anonymous
7/13/2025, 8:11:57 AM No.24545438
>>24545421 (OP)
I've gone to church most of my life and I've never heard that said once
I've gone to church most of my life and I've never heard that said once
Anonymous
7/13/2025, 9:02:33 AM No.24545522
>>24545421 (OP)
Forget companion guides, which fucking bible am I supposed to pick lads? I looked into this and some of them edit out huge sections or even entire books. Who even decided which ones go in? Enoch? Is his included?
Forget companion guides, which fucking bible am I supposed to pick lads? I looked into this and some of them edit out huge sections or even entire books. Who even decided which ones go in? Enoch? Is his included?
Anonymous
7/13/2025, 9:14:22 AM No.24545545
>>24545421 (OP)
you should understand it yourself but you can use other interpetations as a guide for the better paths
you should understand it yourself but you can use other interpetations as a guide for the better paths
Anonymous
7/13/2025, 11:16:02 AM No.24545728
wordcel
7/13/2025, 9:34:08 PM No.24547176
>>24545421 (OP)
Sola Scriputra has always been a wrong ideology.
When a serious question concerning the interpretation of a text arises, you cannot escape this question by insisting on the text. In this situation, you already have a divergence of opinion regarding how the named text is to be understood.
This truth holds with secular texts like the US Constitution, and it holds with holy ones like the Bible.
The problem is even broader. Not even empirical data provides its own interpretation.
Sola Scriputra has always been a wrong ideology.
When a serious question concerning the interpretation of a text arises, you cannot escape this question by insisting on the text. In this situation, you already have a divergence of opinion regarding how the named text is to be understood.
This truth holds with secular texts like the US Constitution, and it holds with holy ones like the Bible.
The problem is even broader. Not even empirical data provides its own interpretation.