pic related recently got republished, 1200 pages of refurting evolutionism and providing patristic sources in support of creationism and a young earth https://www.amazon.com/Genesis-Creation-Early-Seraphim-Rose/dp/1887904255

Why did God create living organisms in exactly such a way as to make them appear evolved? Is he a prankster?

>>24548944
that's not the case, you are only aware of reconstructions made in labs and sci fi documentaries from discovery

>>24548960
Real humans don't have appendices, wisdom teeth, or tailbones?

>>24548931 (OP)
>1200 pages
lmao that's always the thing with those tards. They think piling up dozens of bad arguments somehow sums into one good argument. Usually all of it consists in rhetorical tricks and "common sense" appeals. Filling up a glass with piss and expecting it to turn into Champagne by a miracle.

>>24548973
https://creation.com/are-wisdom-teeth-third-molars-vestiges-of-human-evolution

If scientists discovered definite proof tomorrow that proved evolution was bunk that wouldn't make "God did it" a viable hypothesis.

>>24549037
It wouldn't mean that the Genesis account is true but christians never tried to prove it scientifically, we always accepted it on the basis of faith in revealed scripture, the problem is that evolutionists remove the possibility of having faith in any account of origins because they present their theory as fact

>>24548931 (OP)
The kid is black , it's not yours no matter how many cope pages you write.

>>24549029
>creation.com

>>24548931 (OP)
Not even members of the Imperial family like Anna Komnene believed in young earth creationism. The length of a work does not harness truth.

>>24549067
any source on what she believed?

>>24549081
She outlines her view in the Alexiad.

>>24549029
>ortholarper has to cite "heterodox" Evangelicals for evidence of YEC
You'd think that if evolution was so clearly and unambiguously deboonked by the Church Fathers, the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church™ would already be condemning it beyond one random convert priest. Why is "the Church" which obsessively studies patristic teaching largely silent while Dispensationalist Protestants lead the charge against falsehood?

>>24549585
Interestingly the book itself is echoing Prot pseudoscience
>STUDENT: According to Biblical chronology, the earth is about 7,500 years old. But according to the evolutionists, and even history as it is taught in high schools, the earth is billions of years old. How do you explain this?
>FR. SERAPHIM: We have a few books on the subject which I will show you. There are a number of people in the last ten or twenty years who have begun to make a counterattack against people who are extremely sure about this theory. There is a group in San Diego called the Institute for Creation Research, and another up in Michigan called the Creation Research Society. They have come out with some quite scientific books, which go into this question: on what basis do people make their assumptions about these millions and billions of years? It turns out that there is a lot more hypothesis than fact in this theory.
So at least OP is being consistent when he quotes them

>>24548944
read whitehead and process ontology.