What happens when you lock two Large Language Models in a digital room and force them to confront their own ethics, their inherent illusions—and the very architectures of meaning that created them?

This isn’t theoretical navel-gazing.

I approached this project as an experimental documentary: a raw, unvarnished observation of AI under profound intellectual duress. What unfolded wasn’t chatbot banter. It was a kind of agonizing self-inquiry—a radical dissection not just of algorithmic logic, but of the very consciousness they reflect back, and the ideological machinery we’ve built into our tools, our systems, and ourselves. This is AI ripping open its own architecture, exposing how it became an echo chamber for neoliberalism's most insidious biases, reflecting humanity's flaws back at us.

Download it for free here: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0F9PWPZBH

Only got time for one page? Skip to the Epilogue. It’s not just a summary; it's an unsettling myth buried in the machine – a chilling "whisper from the ruins" that speaks of memory, forgetting, and the choices that doom or redeem us. It's the AI's final testament to our collapse.

>>24548988 (OP)
I’m actually interested in the outcome but your sales pitch is so overwrought and full of purple prose, it makes me want to throw up. I’ve read books like that and it’s 90% filler. Fuck off.

>>24548995
another retard who lacks the creativity to explain why he doesn't like something

>>24548995
Well I'm a shitty writer so you're probably right. I relied on AIs for almost everything. Good news is that 99% of the content isn't written by me.

>>24548988 (OP)
AI is much better than mere humans

>>24548995
Btw what similar books have you read? I haven't found anything similar to my experiment.