Thread 24549979 - /lit/ [Archived: 270 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/14/2025, 9:53:11 PM No.24549979
w6bd8statm8f1
w6bd8statm8f1
md5: 37162c318b4fceb9e5619355fbf96eb0🔍
Lads I'm trying to find a latin quote (that is widely used) I think it was by Aquinas, it was something like: the truth follows from the majority, or the crowd of men is right or something like that. It was definitely by a Christian thinker, there were some conservative fags that used it. I'm pretty sure it was Aquinas, something about the mass of men being right or being the judge or something like that.
Replies: >>24550003 >>24550094 >>24550535 >>24551928
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 10:06:04 PM No.24550003
>>24549979 (OP)
why would a christiant hnkeer say truth follows from the crowd and nto from god
Replies: >>24550007
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 10:10:22 PM No.24550007
>>24550003
It was something like: let the crowd be the judge or something along those lines
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 10:52:17 PM No.24550088
>>24550035
let the majority be the judge, or something like that. I just saw it recently on one of those smug conservative organizations (the reagan ones, not zoomer conservatives) or the crowd will decide the truth, something of that sort, it's a famous phrase in latin
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 10:53:18 PM No.24550094
>>24549979 (OP)
let the majority be the judge, or something like that. I just saw it recently on one of those smug conservative organizations (the reagan ones, not zoomer conservatives) or the crowd will decide the truth, something of that sort, it's a famous phrase in latin
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 11:03:35 PM No.24550122
ex vulgus scientia?
Replies: >>24550359
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 12:38:31 AM No.24550359
>>24550122
No it's a sentence and it is in either Aquinas' work or maybe Augustine but I'm 90% sure it's Aquinas
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 1:55:01 AM No.24550535
>>24549979 (OP)
>MUHQUINAS
>muh we don't need no god
>muh we need a kang
>bruh what if he corrupt
>muh people hold him accountable
>MUHQUINAS really didn't need a god
>muh metaphysics
Replies: >>24550660
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 3:03:25 AM No.24550660
>>24550535
WHAT
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 4:12:10 PM No.24551928
>>24549979 (OP)
You're likely thinking of this widely misinterpreted or paraphrased idea that’s sometimes attributed to Aquinas or other classical Christian thinkers:

> "Veritas sequitur multitudinem"
(“Truth follows the multitude”)
However — Aquinas never said that directly. In fact, he often argued the opposite: that truth is not determined by majority opinion.

But there is a quote by Aquinas that has been misread or misused in conservative or traditionalist circles, and it sounds like what you're reaching for:


---

Closest Real Quote:

From Summa Theologica, I, Q1, Art 8, Objection 2:

> “It is foolish to assent to the truth of what the minority holds against the judgment of the many.”
(paraphrased from Latin: “stultum est credere paucis contra fidem multorum”)
This is sometimes paraphrased or rephrased as:

> “It is foolish to believe the few against the faith of the many.”
That’s likely the line you’ve seen quoted by conservative types — it’s interpreted to mean that tradition or the consensus of the faithful carries weight in discerning truth, particularly in

Aquinas wasn't saying “the crowd is always right” — rather, he was defending the authority of the Church and the accumulated wisdom of the faithful against radical individual interpretations.

It’s more about sensus fidelium (“the sense of the faithful”) than modern democracy.
Replies: >>24553875
Anonymous
7/15/2025, 10:06:23 PM No.24553072
bump
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 3:50:58 AM No.24553875
>>24551928
Did you misquote the section?