Anonymous
7/15/2025, 8:21:56 PM No.24552744
The first paradox is actually really cool to think about and took millennium to be solved with Planck lengths (lowest measurement which can’t be divided in half). That one actually got me thinking and was a neat idea.
Paradoxes 2 and 3 are just inane. Achilles’ velocity would need to be in exact equilibrium with the hare’s for that paradox to work which doesn’t make any sense. Likewise, paradox 3 is a non-sequitur because “taking up space” and “at rest” are not the same thing. It isn’t the same definition of both of them. Paradox 3 is easily solved if you just take motion as possible basically
Paradoxes 2 and 3 are just inane. Achilles’ velocity would need to be in exact equilibrium with the hare’s for that paradox to work which doesn’t make any sense. Likewise, paradox 3 is a non-sequitur because “taking up space” and “at rest” are not the same thing. It isn’t the same definition of both of them. Paradox 3 is easily solved if you just take motion as possible basically
Replies: