Why is he so retarded?

>>24553355 (OP)
christcuckery brainrot

People read him as a sort of retarded dogmatist because they themselves are retarded dogmatists. His writing is muddled it takes a bit of work to understand what he’s really saying. But philosophy attracts lazy and unimaginative people with an inflated sense of of their own intelligence. I’m not an avatarfag this is exactly what Fichte would say if he was posting itt. If you think Kant is writing about how our minds/brains filter reality, you got filtered. If you think transcendental faculties are psychological, you got filtered. If you think Kant transcendentally affirmed the existence of the thing in itself, you got filtered. If you think practical reason is somehow secondary, you got filtered and have probably only read the first critique. If you think Kant was proposing a theory of the cause of causality, you got filtered. If you think the transcendental deduction is describing some sort of mechanistic process, you got filtered. If you don’t understand the nature of transcendental idealism in relation to empirical realism, you got filtered. If you think Kant was a solipsist, as does one anon here, you’re a fucking idiot.

>>24553395
>this is exactly what Fichte would say if he was posting itt.
holy fucking losers on /lit/ man seriously

>>24553415
People who post one sentence no-content idealism threads because they’re sad lonely fucks with no one to talk to, and never in many years write a single post worth reading, are losers.

>>24553355 (OP)
no, he is obviously big brain
just looks at the pic bro

>>24553415
NTA but retards like you look so stupid when projecting and freaking out over nothing

>>24553463
the larp is just cringe. simple as.

He isn't.

>>24553355 (OP)
He's not. He's an extremely intelligent man born before the death of God. We were robbed of a secular Kant's philosophy.