>>24554737 (OP)>>24554879He was a dumb cock sucker
>>24554737 (OP)Cucked by Marx and Feuerbach
Someone explain why he didn't like the state. The people in the state got there by their power, so what right does he have to complain? He just lost.
>>24557176Because he did not have control over the state himself. It's not some sort of ideology where you have to praise those at the top of the hierarchy. Stirner was a post-leftist.
>>24557176>muh explain stirner to me>muh state muh trVdition Yeah I'm sure all the radical egoists would be happy to explain the guy who conjectured you're fucked so go do whatever to you.
>>24557176Stirner is a bit of a hypocrite in that he doesn't admit defeat easily, yes. I think you would have to marry stirnerite egoism with something like stoicism or existentialism to make it fully coherent.
>>24554879Was he jewish or what? He would love modern day nonwhites.
>>24557836Aww guenonanon, the stirnerists can't help you.
>>24557836I doubt that very much. Stirner was as strict to moral and ethical dogmas as he was to enslaving yourself to the idea of money, or cultural recognition. I think he'd find them just as "spooked".
>>24554879lol, stirners are such impotent faggot trannies
>logical conclusions of philosophy is ultimately about how we are merely unconscious manifestations acting on selfish desires
>writes books implying consciousness and self-determination based on young hegelian tabula rasa bullshit that he was indoctrinated in during his youth
Retarded high school drop-outs are the only people that still talk about this pseud.