Thread 24555432 - /lit/ [Archived: 250 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/16/2025, 7:28:16 PM No.24555432
The-face-of-a-man-gives-us-fuller-and-more-interesting-information-than-his-tongue.
If physiognomy is real than why all of the fashion supermodels are not also dominating philosophy, medicine and engineering departments? In most cases they're dumb as shit. Same goes for actors. Go to the philosophy and engineering department of your uni and you'll find ugly but extremely smart and good men. Why is that?
Replies: >>24555439 >>24555796 >>24555799 >>24556001 >>24556939
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 7:29:06 PM No.24555436
no one outside of 4chan thinks physiognomy is real.
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 7:30:49 PM No.24555439
>>24555432 (OP)
Because physiognomy is retarded. Also look at the guy saying this with his yee yee ass haircut
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 7:34:29 PM No.24555450
If physiognomy is real does that mean Socrates was a retard?
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 9:16:33 PM No.24555796
>>24555432 (OP)
Because its not real
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 9:17:35 PM No.24555799
>>24555432 (OP)
Schopenhauer didn't mean that good-looking people were geniuses. He meant niggers and indians were retarded
Replies: >>24555807
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 9:19:34 PM No.24555807
>>24555799

What Schopenhauer actually believed:

1. Yes, he was racist by modern standards — like many 19th-century thinkers, Schopenhauer held Eurocentric and orientalist views, and he expressed strong (often offensive) opinions about various peoples in his writings.


2. However, the quote you're referring to — often misquoted — is from his writing on aesthetics, where he suggests that physical beauty can correlate with intelligence or spiritual depth, but he ties this to classical ideals of proportion, not race.

For example, in The World as Will and Representation, he discusses how beauty (especially in faces) reflects a harmony of inner nature — but he does not reduce this to race in the way the statement you quoted does.
3. Schopenhauer respected Indian philosophy, especially Vedanta and Buddhism. He often cited the Upanishads as some of the greatest philosophical texts. He was not dismissive of Indian intellectual traditions — in fact, he saw them as superior to much of Western religion.
---

Summary:

Schopenhauer was flawed and bigoted in some ways, yes — like many of his time — but the quote you gave is a false, inflammatory distortion.

He did not write that "n****rs and Indians are retarded."

He admired Indian philosophy, and his view of intelligence and beauty was metaphysical and idealist — not rooted in modern racial categories.
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 10:15:51 PM No.24556001
>>24555432 (OP)
Well, it's not that pretty people are better at doing things, it's just that they get to look prettier while they're doing it.
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 10:32:34 PM No.24556063
>An important instance from modern times is furnished by the answer which the British Anti-slavery Society received to their question in 1840 from the North American Anti-slavery Society in respect of the treatment of slaves in the slave-holding states of the North American Union: Slavery and the internal slave-trade in the United States of North America, being replies to questions transmitted by the British Anti-slavery Society to the American Anti-slavery Society. London, 1841, 280 pp., price 4s. in cloth. This book constitutes one of the gravest indictments against human nature. None will lay it aside without horror and few without tears. For whatever its reader may have heard, imagined, or dreamt about the unhappy state of the slaves or even human harshness and cruelty in general, will seem to him of no account when he reads how those devils in human form, those bigoted, church-going, strict sabbath-observing scoundrels, especially the Anglican parsons among them, treat their innocent black brothers who through violence and injustice have fallen into their devil’s claws. This book, which consists of dry but authentic and substantiated accounts, inflames to such a degree all human feeling that, with it in our hands, we could preach a crusade for the subjugation and punishment of the slave-holding states of North America. For they are a disgrace to the whole of humanity.

you chuddies ain't gonna like this... then again...

>That the Negroes were enslaved more than other races, and on a large scale, is evidently a result of their being, in contrast to other races, inferior in intelligence - which, however, does not justify such slavery.
Anonymous
7/17/2025, 1:51:17 AM No.24556663
an intelligent person's face looks like it belongs to an intelligent person. he is not making the case that most strikingly symmetrical face is the best at everything. pay attention to what you're reading.
Anonymous
7/17/2025, 3:44:10 AM No.24556939
>>24555432 (OP)
literally comparing apples to oranges.