Was he right about the elites?
>>24561453 (OP)weeell, what did he say about them elites?
>>24561453 (OP)he was always right and is still right today. his only shortcoming is that he wrote the power elite before the public was even aware of how much the CIA and other alphabet agencies had begun to behave as paramilitary-mafia secret police organizations, much less that the corporate would become so cravenly decadent that it would lead to the pedogate problem (which epstein is the tip of the iceberg). otherwise his theory of the coincidental triangulation of interests between the corporate, military, and executive elites is dead on till today. everything else is offbase if not retarded
>>24562044Corporate world*, also that its pedo problem is directly related to the totally nefarious deep state/mafia dimension as well. again, nothing going on today is not accounted for by the set of relations derived by his theory
>>24562044man speaking of that guy the scanner darkly movie was fire i should smoke some weed and watch it btw what was his scandal didn't the iron man guy get cancelled in the 90s or was that a different guy
Heโs wrong, just the pre-internet version of updoot farming. Also no one is interested in buying books and reading articles about things which go beyond or counter to what they want to consume. Want to know why nothing ever changes no matter who gets voted into power, no matter who gets drummed out and who gets put in, and only something on the order of a revolution changes anything significantly? Ever wonder why large corporations can never turn themselves around and rebound into innovation and greatness? This guy wonโt answer those questions.