The notion of audio books is inherently laughable.
>B-but you can r-read while you're d-doing something else
Jesus fucking Christ, the absolute state.

They're good for visually impaired people, but that's about it.

k. my goodreads still says "read", though.

>>24561779 (OP)
can you elaborate any further than that or no

>>24561923
Yes anon:

You see, books are things you read.

>>24561913
And yet you haven't read it. They scammed you twice.

>>24561930
>books are things you read.
have you read Homer? Shakespeare?

>The notion of audio books is inherently laughable
Why not just say "laughable"? Why even bother modifying with "inherently" if you offer nothing to show how being "laughable" is a necessary, essential quality to audiobooks? I would agree with you that they're not real reading, but you aren't doing yourself a favor by pretending you're somehow superior to people who use them.

>>24561965
hahaha I came here to also point out how baffling a phrase "inherently laughable" is.

>>24561965
OP clearly doesn't speak English

>>24561779 (OP)
It's funny how many people actually seethe at this truth, /lit/ is looking grim with this many audiobook nonreaders

>>24562398
and yet … >>24561944 radio silence

>>24562398
>/lit/ is looking grim with this many audiobook nonreaders
Where? Majority of posts here are calling OP ESL. You can’t call others illiterate if you fuck up the first sentence of the thread.

>>24561779 (OP)
What about long haul truckers? Or dyslexics?