How does he compare, metaphysically speaking, to Guenon and Evola?

Evola and Guenon are naive nondualists whereas Hegel actually works out a non-classical logic for nondualism which allows much greater depth and explanatory value

>>24565504 (OP)
Despite his Hegel obsession I don’t see him as much of a metaphysical writer though of course I only know him from his rather weak articles.

He is like a standard commie except without materialism and with “what if both diametrically opposite things are true simultaneously”???

>>24565584
>only read his articles
Read Less Than Nothing

>>24565584
>though of course I
Didn't read the sublime object of ideology

You sir, are a cunt, call on my second.

Bump

>>24565593
>read this +1000 page commie slop
nah

>>24565574
Hegel’s autism metaphysics isn’t truly non-dual but is pluralistic, and plurality is just another kind of duality.

>>24567917
>everything is geist
>this is somehow pluralistic
Plz familiarize w source material, hunny <3

>>24565584
>without materialism
what

.>>24565504 (OP)
>Supports NATO
>Supports Israel
>Supports niggers
>Supports mass immigration
>Supports democrats
>Supports feminism
>Seethes over people not liking jews and niggers

Zizek is just your out-of-the-mill demoncrat obscuring it over lacan word salads and hegel

>>24567917
this is wrong in several ways, congrats

>>24565504 (OP)
Is he an Indian cocksucker like Guenon and Evola?

>>24568626
not even remotely

>>24565574
Hegel was retroactively refuted by Stirner-Nietzsche

>>24565574
>explanatory value
Nonsense. Hegel and truth do not belong in the same sentence.

>>24568626
Sorry they don't worship jews, tranny.

>>24568671
Filtered

>>24568674
Both of them would become trannies for 5 rupees

>>24565584
You’re proud of being an ignorant retard. Why are you in /lit/? Read everything discard what is useless

>>24568597
True Marxists support revolutionary movements. Zizek is just another liberal who is more philosophically minded.

>>24568659
>a metaphysics was refuted by an ontologically inferior non-metaphysics
incoherent. not how things work, I'm afraid.

>>24565504 (OP)
They are really nothing alike, it is asking how Michael Jordan compares to Nicholas Cage.

Zizek is a professor of Hegel, Marx, and Lacan. Guenon and Evola are just a couple of occultists advancing a traditionalist/perennialist ideology - I don't say ideology as a pejorative, I mean that they are concerned for the world to get with a certain spiritual program. Zizek is more of a critic.

>>24568659
why did you say "retroactive"? and what is the refutation? I've read Hegel and Nietzsche. They seem to be on pretty different pages. Nietzsche expressing disagreement with them, and offering a psychological explanation for these philosophies, is not "refuting." I think Nietzsche would consider embarking on a refutation of these philosophies to be a complete waste of time. Surprisingly, he doesn't even dislike Hegel.

>>24569937
Exactly

>>24565584
Commies are pseudo-materialistic

>>24568597
He was always a socdem. Look at his political activism during Yugoslavia.