Why he could not just write as Schoppy did?
You can say whatever you want about Schopenhauer, but he is by far a better writer than Hegel.

Hegel wrote about more complex topics

if he did, it would be obvious he is stupid.

>>24568559
FPBP

/thread

>>24568559
>the history of mankind is a history of LE PROGRESS
>the realization of the absolute spirit is le state
Now what?

>>24568569
is this type of post bot?

>>24568575
you are like the best AI detection person I've ever seen. you should be hired and given written text to decide whether a human or computer wrote it. I'm certain the opposite of what you said will be true every single time.

>>24568553 (OP)
Yes, Schopenhauer is vastly superior than the hack on the right.

>>24568559
>I like goobdleygook
You are probably a fucking professor. Kill yourself.

He could if he wanted to, but that would be counter-productive to running his fraud. Schopenhauer identified him as a fake, that’s all.

>>24568553 (OP)
Stop making this fucking thread retard

>>24568559
The fact that Hegel 'scholars' can't even agree on the correct interpretation of his philosophy means he wrote obscurantist nonsense.

It was just how people wrote philosophy in that time. Read his lectures if you want something more layman

>>24569249
There isn't a single philosopher that "scholars" have an agreed upon interpretation of

>>24568559
and yet as Frederick C. Beiser notes:

>The chief challenge of Schopenhauer to the Neo-Kantians, however, came from his opposing conception of philosophy. While the Neo-Kantian conception was at first limited to the theoretical or epistemology, Schopenhauer’s conception of philosophy put the ethical and existential interests of philosophy front and center.

>Ultimately, for the general public, and eventually for the Neo-Kantians themselves, Schopenhauer’s conception of philosophy proved a more attractive solution to the identity crisis. Schopenhauer’s conception not only ensured philosophy against obsolescence—because the empirical sciences could not answer questions about the value and meaning of life—but it was also more true to the traditional vocation of philosophy. Furthermore, Schopenhauer’s conception gave philosophy an immediate relevance and importance, given that the value of life is of direct interest to every human being. While the Neo-Kantian conception made philosophy a specialized and esoteric academic discipline, Schopenhauer’s conception made philosophy a public and exoteric concern. No wonder, then, that the Neo-Kantian conception remained confined to the universities, while Schopenhauer’s found favor among the general educated public.

despite this passage being about Neo-Kantians it highlights the fact that metaphysical navel-gazing is a university problem, reserved for the out of touch. Schopenhauer return philosophy to the human and personal. I think Hegel has his uses (particularly in history) but lets be real.

>>24569258
>There isn't a single philosopher that "scholars" have an agreed upon interpretation of
You're a retarded Hegelian. Keep that academic careerist retardation to yourself.

>>24569203
>Schopenhauer identified him as a fake,
Who is determining the criteria for being "fake" and authentic? Hairsplitting careerist subhumans sitting in universities discussing why Hegel used a "-" in his book? Kill yourself

>>24569465
When you consider that Schopenhauer exclusively read Kant and Plato to form his masterwork, it instantly becomes apparent that the real value of his project is in its re-moulding of the Kantian philosophy to the original Platonic ethico-existential concerns of philosophy.

>>24569818
>When you consider that Schopenhauer exclusively read Kant and Plato to form his masterwork,
I think the Schopenhauer would be the first to tell you how much the Upanishads influenced him. I also think he had some familiarity with Descartes, Spinoza, and Hume as well.

>>24569834
He wrote World as Will at age 26 which he exclusively formulated as a response to Plato and Kant on the recommendation of his advisor Schulz. The Upanishads weren’t even available to Europe until several decades after, and schopie saw in them not an influence but a confirmation of his philosophical intuitions.

>>24568559
The idea that the complexity of the topic warrants the way he writes is insane. It could be far more clear. He was obviously too insane to let an editor look at it.

>>24569834
>>I think the Schopenhauer would be the first to tell you how much the Upanishads influenced him.
Not true at all. He said that he was amazed to find same truths in Upanishads that were in his philosophy.