Has anyone seen this top ten list for "Best books of all time"? It looks like it was amalgamated by an army of 9 year olds perusing their class libraries and another army of middle aged Christian women (and maybe some 9 year olds too). Picrel is an actual screenshot from the website, but this site is a goldmine and I want y'all to read the comments on all these picks.

> https://www.thetoptens.com/books/best-books/

Harry potter is obvious but I didnt know that people glazed hunger games THAT much

>>24568939 (OP)
The descriptions on the entries are absolutely dreadful holy shit, imagine having the audacity to rank books when your own writing level is this low

>>24568939 (OP)
Rodrick Rules should be higher. Tasteless fucks ruined /litcrit/.

>>24568949
It basically defined the whole subgenre of 2010s YA scifi set in a dystopian future society in which a teenage female main character fights against the powers that be and usually leads some sort of revolution. Extremely popular stuff.

Actually, I recall it was significantly more readable than its copycats, though it's been over a decade for me (and I was much younger with worse taste) so take that with a grain of salt. Divergent was another popular one, and that was completely awful slop. But my favorite of the subgenre was probably Scott Westerfeld's Uglies books, which I don't think managed to achieve any fame. I reread them a few years ago on a whim and they held up better than I expected, especially the last book, Extras.

>>24568939 (OP)
Just imagine /lit/ adding their own comments and it's just a flood of the most bizarre, esoteric takes on every book.