>>24577224Okay I finished about 25 pages:here’s my thoughts. I’ll read more later and see if this holds up.
I’ve learned from my writing that you have to earn the simplicity of language with honesty, accuracy and structure. You have the honesty but I think it sort of lacks the structure (meaning narrative build up) needed to really punch. Simple language is okay but you have to be more careful with literary cliches because they will stand out like a sore thumb . There’s lots of great source material here. The idea of not seeing your dad for many years only for him to return as something alien and weird is a brutal thought and something that you experienced. I didn’t read the whole thing-maybe just 25 pages or so but, I think this would really improve with a more structured rewrite. Checkout Raymond Carver’s short story anthologies. Pick the heaviest hitting moments from this book and format them into something a little more literary and intentional. There are parts here that read a little too much link “Another day in my worthless, chud incel life” meets “Are You There God, It’s me Judy Bloom”. You have heavy subject matter but it’s presented in such a way that it doesn’t land. If you’re already going down the semifictional route then lean on that if the source material doesn’t drive it home.
I really think reading Carver would be huge for you. He shows how to land a gut shot with language that doesn’t dazzle.
Not gonna knock you for this, because, as a writer myself, I know how much it sucks but people are going to give you shit for the grammar and syntax. I know you don’t have any aims of publishing in the traditional route but it’s something to think about improving even if it’s just a quick run through grammerly.
I hope this wasn’t too mean but it’s the only way we get better. You did what most people won’t ever do in even completing this, but if you really want it to land and resonate with people I think you need to think about narrative weight, flow and structure.
Pic unrelated