>>24575003 (OP)
No. Ferrante is the only exception.
Generally speaking it’s better to prioritize the canon, but especially in a time like ours when great writers are virtually extinct. If someone breaks out a great contemporary work all the sudden that gets everyone talking, I’ll read it. But it doesn’t happen anymore.
I tend to stick to things published in my own lifetime.
You won’t learn anything new by ploughing through the canon. Better to be future oriented. Where literature is going is more important than where it was
>>24575003 (OP)
Nobody besides Krasznahorkai (and McCarthy until he passed). I read Inherent Vice, too, but it felt like boomer nostalgia for THC-induced paranoia