>>24579234
If the very dilemma of "being" and "being" seems far too immaterial for the oblivious anglo to grasp without endangering their long-calcified synapses, they must naturally assume such anger and confusion must be caused by wicked machinations of a non-english speaking conspirator. Just like when they spill their fries over the metric system asserting their "measuring by burgers" is not scientific nor precise in the slightest.
But enlightenment does not come from a single nation, no, you've erred
>>24579706 terribly in belittling Portuguese "ser" and "estar" when such transcendental concepts are also commonplace in German's "sein" and "werden", and Spanish " onions" and "estoy", and the list goes on.
These extraordinary languages simply stem from the same civilizational DNA, yours just so happen to be Latin's bastard child who speaks in ebonics after surviving an abortion attempt. The lack of introspective breadth available to your cognitive vernacular is the telltale sign of a civilization where its people delegate their state of minds to concurrent personas so deeply turned into the very products they consume, and even idolize
>>24579703 such branding as they aren't worth of being referred to as a gendered humans, not as a man, but rather as a genderless, formless "them" stock to be herded around by their anglo masters into the local slaughterhouse, one burger at a time.
