>this book isn't good because it doesn't follow the random convention set 200 years ago by pretentious faggot writers

Why are ALL /lit/ posters like this?

>>24578865 (OP)
Give one example of what you're talking about

>>24578895
isn't it obvious, any book that isn't all style but plot

This is a bait thread, but I agree with the sentiment. The amount of "urdur this character is bad cause X happens so Y MUST happen as some other authors do" I've seen makes me seethe. Not just in /lit/ but other places too

>>24578865 (OP)
It has already been answered but not really understood, they are Godless that is why.

>>24578865 (OP)
This is more of a problem with film and /tv/ than /lit/ in my experience.

>>24578865 (OP)
its usually that it is following trite conventions set 200 years ago thats the actual problem. exhibit a:

>>24578911
you cant escape style. you can only resort to boring and unoriginal styles, which does make the book less good.