Does it live up to the hype?
just a bunch of people going to each others houses
>>24579805 (OP)Fiction peaked with Austen
It's been a long time since I read it but this is basically the story
>Oh I'm a woman in past year. I don't want to marry one of these dullards.
>Hello woman I am Mr. Darcy. I don't have a first name. I am an asshole.
>You are an asshole Mr. Darcy and I will not marry you.
>Okay, I will go away for a while.
>Wow several good things happened to me.
>It's me, Mr. Darcy. I'm back. I secretly made good things happen to you and prevented bad things from happening to your sister. Also I have reflected on my actions and I am less of an asshole. I respect your intelligence or whatever.
>Alright let's get married maybe is that how the book ends
>>24579805 (OP)absolutely. people who say it's boring are either too dumb for it or being willfully obtuse. austen's prose is phenomenal.
>>24579805 (OP)in plotting i feel it's an inferior or more dubious version of evelina. but austen's prose elevates it. you won't regret reading it in any event.
Non. Read Stendhal or Flaubert instead. All these boudoir british novels are just glorified chicklit.
>>24579805 (OP)Breddy gud. Absolutely lovely writing, and even elicited a few sensible chuckles. Left the impression of a very finely crafted, delicate piece of art. I can definitely understand the hype.