Imagine taking either of these snake oil sellers seriously.

Love Freud. He makes pseuds and retards seethe.

>>24582088
>this retarded pseud makes pseuds and retards seethe

>>24582070 (OP)
Jung is an astrologer

Now Freud, he gets proven more right every decade that passes. Have you seen how popular mom-son incest porn is with normies? It is by far more viewed than regular porn.

>>24582100
thats not a confirmation, thats a self-drinking milkshake

>>24582123
If it was some fringe niche, it'd be a self-drinking milkshake. Now, it's more popular than regular porn by every measure. So it's a confirmation.

Freud advances one of the most convincing arguments for the causes of homosexuality and tranninism there is. I don't know why chuds hate him so much. Is it because he's Jewish?

>>24582139
>Now, it's more popular than regular porn by every measure.
That‘s a bold claim which I simply don‘t believe and it‘d still be a self-fulfilling prophecy unless it had always been as such. This also neglects that stepmoms as a unique product of post-sexual revolution divorces are probably the single greatest factor which he knew nothing about.

>>24582100
>Have you seen how popular mom-son incest porn is with normies
I don't know what's more retarded between believing porn related statistics and believing the plotline is why people watch specific porn vids.

I didn't get past the definition autism part, though I've read the Hoffmann's story, did Freud offer an explanation on how and why The Uncanny might sexually arouse someone?

>>24582100

That's simply because the first woman most teenage boys see is their mom's. But they repress that shit for obvious reasons. One could even argue that most of momcest is hyperreal. None of that literal baby boys want to fuck their mama's shit though

>>24582173
>Freud advances one of the most convincing arguments for the causes of homosexuality and tranninism there is
QRD?

>>24582100
the japanese love their mom/shota drawn porn too

>>24582070 (OP)
If you read Freud symbolically with primacy on his method over his literal theories, he's a genius. We're all Freudians now.

>In a voluminous comment on The Book of the Law, Crowley notes that “Ra-Hoor-Khuit is the Crowned and Conquering Child in ourselves; our own personal God.” He continues: “The Child is the Dwarf-Self, the Phallic consciousness, which is the true life of Man, beyond his 'veils' of incarnation. We have to thank Freud-and especially Jung for stating this part of the Magical Doctrine so plainly, as also for their development of the connection of the Will of this 'child' with the True or Unconscious Will, and so for clarifying our doctrine of the Silent Self, or Holy Guardian Angel. They [i.e. Freud and Jung] are, of course, totally ignorant of magical phenomena, and could hardly explain even such terms as Augoeides; and they are seriously to blame for not stating more openly that this True Will is not to be daunted or suppressed; but within their limits they have done excellent work.

>>24582241
This is literally what Freud says, fren

Freud is entirely invalid. Jung is decent.

*whiny, nasally, little bitch voice*
>Freud is entirely invalid. Jung is decent.
Shut it, poindexter

>>24582497
A genius of inversion. The only reason we’re freudian is because we live a mcluhanesque media age that creates the illusion of occultism and thereby of his methods being correct.

>>24582070 (OP)
I think they are both meteoric geniuses who compliment one another one masculine one feminine one libidinous one mythological both finding shards of the same crystal truth both harnessing intuition but as different kinds of people they arrive at different kinds of conclusions and are any of us courageous enough to proclaim that the ultimate and secret psychic force propelling humanity then and now and forever is the titanic urge to copulate with our mothers and usurp our fathers

>>24582526
You wrote that like you make comics and post them on reddit

eat shit bitch

>>24582802
Oh yeah man its the media that creates that for no reason at all and no one wants it, right? Poor guy has never read ancient stories

>>24582070 (OP)
Money has and does, it doesn't matter what anyone 'thinks'
Even *if* all their ideas and formulations are obsolete they nonetheless succeeded in monetizing the discipline so that today it's a trillion dollar/year industry

>>24583523
Seething KWAB kek

>>24582511

Freud believed that newborn baby boys are attracted to their mom.

>>24582070 (OP)
How about you go back to the "tangible" and "important" then.

>>24582088
/thread

>>24582505
Nigha please. Jung is already ostracized from pure academy soloy for daring to go a little beyond what Freud deemed acceptable or necessary in narrow confines of academics. You have to play by the rules to make any meaningful difference. If anything Jung here is the hero who really pushed beyond accepted dogma while staking his reputation for the sole purpose of discovery.

True will here is also very primal and therefore very dangerous and unpredictable which is the last thing you wish to unleash to a general public. You could argue that thanks to a suppressed docile spirit of common population we still here well in good.. for the most part. Crowley is barely different from any other mystic hack only he is more popular so he's legacy will always be in obscure niches of populus, while someone like Jung, have much greater reach and influence producing comparable result and conclusion, all within layman institutions.

>>24582095
Unironically yes

>>24582070 (OP)
Freud's obsession with family sexual dynamics is way too jewish for my tastes. Jung is better. He wove together mystic and esoteric religious knowledge into something much more accessible and useful to modern westerners.

>>24582070 (OP)
>foto-de-freud-y-jung.jpg