>>24606883You keep saying that it doesn't mean anything, but it clearly does. Apparently everyone knows what it means, except for you. You're acting as if Borges wrote in the 1800s or something when he wrote in the mid to late 20th century. He was obviously aware of what he was. When he talks about fantastic literature he's talking about fantasy works by Carroll, Dunsany, Chesterton, Arabian Nights, Maupassant, Jacobs, (all of whom he anthologized), as well as Tolkien (whom he compared, unfavorably, to Carroll). It was the nature of the work that mattered to him, not if was considered plebeian. You can discuss subgenres and split hairs if you want, but his genre is fantasy. The idea that fantasy is only D&D-like stories is a common misconception.