>The world as representation, that is, solely from the point of view under which we consider it here, has two essential, necessary, and inseparable halves. One is the object; its forms are space and time, hence plurality. The other half is the subject; it is not situated in time and space, because it exists whole and undivided in every being that perceives: from this it follows that a single one of these beings, together with the object, completes the world as representation just as perfectly as all the millions of similar beings that exist; but likewise, if this being disappears, the world as representation no longer exists.
>>24605955 (OP)
>oui oui at least 10% of what you write has to be incomprehensible. Otherwise no one is going to think you're profound.
>oui have to sprinkle in some psychoanalysis otherwise people will mistake you for a philosopher.
>oui oui Le Hegel covered the reflective syllogism already mon amie. You need to catch up.
>oui oui at least 10% of what you write has to be incomprehensible. Otherwise no one is going to think you're profound.
>oui have to sprinkle in some psychoanalysis otherwise people will mistake you for a philosopher.
>oui oui Le Hegel covered the reflective syllogism already mon amie. You need to catch up.