>all Hitler wanted to do was sit in cafes and read books
You know maybe history has not been fair to Hitler. What are some books that I can read to get to know the real Hitler?

>>24606537 (OP)
Hitlers revolution by Tedor

>>24606537 (OP)
slightly off topic, but i saw a reddit post the other day about some guy saying he watched "Man In The High Castle" and how the Nazi territory looked like a utopia, and how "maybe they aren't the bad guys after all".
The reddit comments of course were furious at this assessment, saying stuff about many people have to die to make such a "utopia" achievable, etc. The killing off of the handicapped, deformed, ill... the lack of certain freedoms. About how "nazis only care about the aesthetics" and have no empathy.

But then I got thinking how in the current democracies that we live in, just as many people are killed, if not more so, than what they decry in Nazi societies. Between all the humans aborted by women, to all the innocent people victimized by violent crime/murder... even just comparing the overall health and happiness of people is better in a Nazi society. They're fitter, feel better, less drugs, more cohesive due to racial/group trust. There's very little difference between a liberal aborting their child because "they don't want it" (wow what a great reason! /s) vs Nazis who cull the deformed and ill. We put injured animals out of their misery and call it MERCY, but then subject the unfortunate to their miserable existences. (I'm reminded of this gif where some deformed black person was at a fashion show, on their wheelchair, "walking" the catwalk, and everyone is oo'ing and aahh'ing at it. But it was aesthetically very ugly, and not compassionate at all)
Redditors brought up how "it's not true that Nazis are technologically more advanced", that it's just a meme, but factoring in how children in nazi societies are more studious, and more aiming to please their parents, their teachers and their country, I could actually see Nazis being overall smarter.

And so the argument that "Nazis only care about the aesthetics" is true, but only because aesthetics is the only metric that really matters. Liberals promote ugliness (that's why the women always go out of their way to make themselves uglier) as a virtue, warp compassion to advocate for the criminals and to denigrate the wholesome.

lol reminds me of this classic

>>24606691
>it's okay for millions to die via abortion and being preyed upon by violent criminals (that we also import), but it's morally wrong to kill violent criminals or to do mercy killings.
tomato tomato
seems like either way you slice it, people are going to die, so it just becomes a question of which groups. Do you protect the innocent, or protect the criminals. Do you promote beauty and aesthetics, or ugliness and degeneracy? Do you mercy cull the deformed, deranged and severely ill, or do you execute perfectly healthy babies in the womb in order to keep that woman gainfully employed at OnlyFans?

neo nazis are self obsessed peacocks always preening and hoping somebody notices them, they can't actually accomplish their goals besides random murders because it's all an aesthetic shell, poltards belong on /FA

>>24606805
>self obsessed peacocks
let's assume that's true, even if just for the sake of argument: Isn't everyone like that? I see liberals all the time preening about how morally superior they are. "Oh look at me, I'm volunteering to help X because they're so oppressed and poor".
moral peacockery. And they make sure everyone can see it. Just yesterday there was a post on reddit about someone who used an app that allowed them to help random blind people with mundane tasks. The example they posted was of a blind woman who needed help choosing "almond milk" from the grocery store, and this redditor helped via the app.
One could just as easily claim moral superiority for putting the physically ill to gentle execution, ending their pain and suffering. (We can quibble later about what constitutes "physically ill" that would warrant euthanasia)

Nazis want a healthy society, one where there aren't people suffering from obesity, or from easily avoidable diseases. Liberals tolerate all manner of evils for the sake of "freedom". The freedom to be unhealthy, unhappy, to suffer.

There's pros and cons to each side honestly, but from a pure aesthetic point of view, yes, Nazis win that. The ethical winner is debatable, both sides have negatives, both have positives.

>>24606805
You’re confusing Nazis for commies.

>>24606805
>liberal women aren't self-obsessed peacocks.
even obese people would rather be fit and toned. Liberals are deluding themselves if they think fat is "sexy", and it's certainly not healthy.

Liberals are all about giving people miles of rope with which to hang themselves.

>>24606869
>Liberals are all about giving people miles of rope with which to hang themselves.

the heirs to the 3rd Reich aren't white but Persians and Afghans with their morality police whipping people that love freedom.

>>24606840
>"in the bohemian manner of the artist he despised discipline and could not or would not force himself to work."

Besides aesthetic gym maxxing which is motivated by the desire to fuck women, neo nazis are absolute cafe goers.

>>24607028
Dalit coded post

>>24606677
Yes, correct. He was the last person to stand-up against savage liberal capitalism and dreamed of something beautiful. And no, we don't live in a "democracy" when both people you can vote for fucks kids at Epstein's island.

>>24606537 (OP)
Anything by David Irving
- Hitler's War
- The Holocaust Lie

>>24606537 (OP)
In His Own Words – Adolf Hitler

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sb5EuQ2oczY

>>24606691
1. Hitler didn't wanna "take over the world" lmao, all he took was part of germany not even 50 years ago from when he lived

2. He didnt have anything to do with killing jews, that was goebbels

>>24607068
Dalit's represent the ultimate will to power after being downcaste for 3,000 years and finally breaking the wheel in the last 100 years by converting in masse to christianity.

>>24606677
>And so the argument that "Nazis only care about the aesthetics" is true
This shit isn't even true it's just an extremely degraded soundbite argument taken from the claim that fascist Italy was "non-political" and replaced "politics" (aka class interests) with "aesthetics" (actually public ritual meant to reaffirm national unity and supersede class interests in favour of national interests).

>>24606677
>slightly off topic, but i saw a reddit post the other day

Doubtful. Any 'reading period' is merely a gestation period for greater action. The organism is likely unaware of it, but as it collects more and more data, it is instinctually doing its best to decipher its position in reality in order to best decide how to escape it. The being then plans its new trajectory to control whatever mortal woes its environment naturally burdened it with, and then enacts it. After all, for what purpose would data exist without actionable interactivity? Reading for the sake of reading is just another devious time siphoning mental masturbation. If hitler had not been hitler, it would have been another by an other name. Neo nazis scarcely ever understand inevitability.

>>24607372
this except mental (and penile) masturbation is one of the qualities of the golden land we must create someday.

>>24606677
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7jRWvdR5XQ

>"In conflict with a bourgeois world, which with its deceit and false rectitude had nothing to offer him, he sought instinctively his own world and found it in the origins and early history of his own peoples"
p.83

>"So, for my friend it was books, always books. I could not imagine Adolf without books. He stacked them in piles around him. He had to have with him at his side the book he was currently working through. Even if he did not happen to be reading it just then, it had to be around. Whenever he went out, there would usually be a book under his arm. This was often a problem, for he would rather abandon nature and the open sky than the book."
p.179

>"Books were his whole world. In Linz, in order to procure the books he wanted, he had subscribed to three libraries. In Vienna he used the Hof Library so industriously that I asked him once in all seriousness whether he intended to read the whole library, which of course earned me some rude remarks"
p.180

From The Young Hitler I Knew, by August Kubizek (many more citations here https://warosu.org/lit/thread/21010838)

Also:
From With Hitler to the End
>At dinner...In the case of disputes I would have to fetch the lexicons or historical works at which Hitler, who had a fantastic memory, would usually indicate which volume was to be consulted, and also the page number. Since he never dictated the subjects for discussion, it would not have been possible for him to cram up beforehand in order to impress with his knowledge. These discussions might be interrupted for despatches and important reports in the evening papers, or for conferences with colleagues or military men, which would delay his timetable to such an extent that he would have to sit up through the early hours working in the library.

>Before the war Hitler liked to work into the early hours, or talk amongst his intimate circle, and would be woken ‘unofficially’ at ten o’clock unless urgent political business forced him to rise earlier. I would sort the morning papers, and the first foreign despatches which would have been brought from the Reich Chancellery during the night, and put them on a chair outside his bedroom. At eleven o’clock I would waken him ‘officially’ with the words: ‘Good morning, mein Führer, it is eleven o’clock. The newspapers and despatches are at your door.’ He would rise, fetch the post and read it in bed. Sometimes he would open the door in nightshirt and slippers while I was laying the material on the chair. Initially this kind of encounter was rather embarrassing for me and I would stammer my apologies, but Hitler, always unforced and natural, would merely say: ‘It’s nothing. Just leave them.’

>He then read the newspapers and despatches in bed, near which there would be a tea-trolley with books, newspapers, his spectacles and a box with coloured pencils.

>>24607591
>Franco becomes senile and his dictatorship gets dismantled by the cucked royal family

If you can’t see through a smear campaign that grand then there’s no helping you.

>>24607698

>>24607720
>t. nazi with a small dick
You probably would like The Tunnel if you actually read it and are not retarded.

>>24606840
>moral peacockery. And they make sure everyone can see it
exactly. take away the tax write-off and require all donations to be anonymous? See how much "philanthropy" happens.

>>24607767
its just a meme. Its a reference to DIY. More data to add support my hypothesis that "le boogeyman" people of any affiliation are absolute retards.

>>24608076
Expecting /lit/ to get a /diy/ reference is retarded and you are in a one person circle jerk.

>>24606537 (OP)
Just gonna hijack this thread because it's semi-relevant.

Churchill should have surrendered and negotiated at Dunkirk. Hitler was right that the superpower generation was upon them, and they had one chance to do it. If a deal could have been struck, the cataclysm of the rest of the war could have been stopped and Europe might have actually had a future. Churchill held onto a war mandate out of an antiquated "Balance of Powers" mindset and a desire to hold onto the prestige of the empire. In throwing all of their weight into the war, they and the rest of the Allies lost all of that. Ironically, much of the alleged crimes of the holocaust would likely have been nipped in the bud if a deal had been struck. Churchill listened to his furious zionist handlers instead of what would actually be good for British People and Europe.

A United "Superpower" Europe was the only way that those countries could retain real geopolitical power in the 21st century. Instead, they had a pyrrhic victory, lost everything, and became museum countries, quickly being flooded with the world's spiteful masses.

The Realpolitik view of the situation in hindsight is that Hitler was right. This isn't granting advocacy for contemporary neonazi movements, but just to say that Hitler had sized up the situation accurately in terms of Europe's future. Hitler didn't want to take over the world. He wanted to secure a future for Europe and he was crushed for it.

>>24608085
you have been assblasted and your colon will not recover. you are a mental goatse

>>24608310
>Hitler was right that the superpower generation was upon them
Where can I learn more about this?

>>24606537 (OP)
Any biography of him will do, like Fest's or Volker Ullrich's. There's one I really enjoyed, Brigitte Hamman's "Hitler's Vienna," a great, well-researched book.

>>24606691
this pic is really funny because if you replace the german leader with the russian leader, the british leader or the soviet leader - the apparent good guys - nothing changes

>>24608346
>with the russian leader
with the american* leader

>>24606537 (OP)
The best I've read is The Young Hitler I Knew by Kubizek, Hitler's childhood friend. Obviously Mein Kampf as well, and his speeches.

>>24606537 (OP)
Can anyone recommend some non-pozzed books about the painter?

>>24606537 (OP)
He's literally me fr fr

>>24607121
The state of the internet is sad that this kind of shit gets spread around so easily

>>24606537 (OP)
Wasn't sure where else to post this (and I don't think it deserves a new thread), but where can I buy "The Dispossessed Majority" without dropping $300+? It's insanely expensive on Amazon. I guess it's a "banned book," so to speak. It's available online, but I'd prefer a hard copy.

https://ia800603.us.archive.org/17/items/TheDispossessedMajority/WilmotRobertson-DispossessedMajority-Dm_text.pdf

>>24609732
It's sad how many people feel threatened by the idea of actually thinking about stuff and considering alternatives to what they've been force fed by propagandists. Many of you subhuman retards even try to use the law to regulate the thoughts of others.

>>24608395
Good book. Although I still don't understand why so many neo-Nazis like it. Half of the book is Kubizek making his friend look like an incel sperg, and the other half is homoeroticism.