Can anyone explain to me why describing someone as a corporatist is considered by G*ogle to be "often derogatory"?

Apologies for the low quality post, I've never posted here before.

>>24616741 (OP)
Are you stupid?

>>24616741 (OP)
forget about your unimportant question. what's your favourite mineral ?

>>24616807
Yes, very stupid. Which is why I'm asking.

>>24616741 (OP)
Derogatory terms are almost exclusively invented by people who are outsiders to the group they are making fun of. These terms are usually also general. The term "white people" for instance, was invented by american niggers because they were not white and couldn't care for the fine grained details of french, german, british, etc. Likewise, nobody cares to distinguish between ethiopian blacks and west african blacks, even though they are radically different. People who work corporate jobs refer to themselves as operations managers, SAAS specialists, logistics specialists, etc. People who don't work those jobs, call them all corporatists

>>24616843
Gotcha, thank you for the response. I was having trouble divorcing myself from the idea of someone's POLICIES being corporatist as opposed to generalizing someone's occupation/job description itself as corporatist. This has been really helpful, thank you.

>>24616843
Nobody calls someone who works a corporate job a corporatist. Are you a child?