>>24845975
National socialism is the most basic bitch ooga booga ideology known to man.
It's easy to be a nazi, and smarter than commies too since that is an ideology only relevant forliteral caveman tribal societies without the ability to civilize
>>24846231
Literally every ideology you described was/is some sort of socialism, be it national, international or cultural.
Liberalism is solely cultural socialism where the state cucks it's socialist framework in yhe field of economics to the smallest extent possible for the immense gain.
This is why literal Trotskyites find zero problems with embracing it.
>>24846318
>NTA
Liberalism works as intented
Graduate high school, no literally, graduate high school and then look back on how utterly insane that shit sounds, especially after your early 20s; >you just wasted most of your teens on a concentration camp designed by insane Prussians to indoctrinate children to the army and factories.
Education for most of civilization was based mostly on tutoring and university style lectures but without as harsh a credit system
This all stems from the basis of liberalism, which is 18th socialism lite
This is also why there are no philosophically literate radical liberals.
The socialist lites on the other hand have a proper philosophy, its just that its platonist delusions ie. philosophical trannyism.
They have to reinvent economics, education and social regulation because platonism naturally concludes in communism, an ideology that assumes collectives are real and individuals are a social construct (since they have no checks by reality due to dialectics being almost entirely in "the world of forms" ie platonist delusions), the holy geist decides everything(instead of people acting ultimately according to their philosophy) labor theory of value is valid and equality is something good in and of itself.
Such ideologies have to refuse the existence of scarcity because it debunks their supremacy of the form.
This is also why trannies and enviromentalists often become leftists, one refuses that scarcity doesn't allow him to become a woman while the other refuses that scarcity should be solved at all, instead promoting that ultimately humanity itself should be curtailed to whatever arbitrary extent it deems fit.
There have been other derivations, such as Plato's own nonsense, however their relevance is of secondary import.
The liberal subconsciously acts on these premises while vocally having to disavow them since he has to cuck to economics but to the least extent possible to achieve total political power because they, like many other leftist s, believe will is an actual force a la you can will shit into existence thus political power is ultimately the greatest power there should be, and the economic power of a society is merely a tool for this instead of both political and economic power being means to combat scaricty.
A contradictory philosophy if you look at it on a surface level desu
