>>126760020>Women are way more expensive to hire and yet they continue to make up a huge chunk of the work forceThat comment actually proves my point. How come women are seen are "more expensive" or otherwise a burden on the economy? If you mean that they will have to take time off to have babies, then your whole project is forcing women into a biological role. In the real world women are less likely to get a promotion, less likely to be employed, and will be harassed at work. Out of all of billionaires in the world, only 11% are women.
>Lolno, there are tons of women in positions of power of all kinds, even ministers of war and stuff like that, that you might consider more male oriented. Unless you're literally just referring to the US presidency, which is retarded.In the world, only 4 parliaments have more women than men. In the West, less than 30% of the lawmakers are women.
>You yourself said that the opinions of people here are a tiny minority, and yet we also hold massive social influence? You understand that you're completely contradicting your stance right? The mass shooting thing is just something you pulled out of your ass, and if you wanna talk about reprehensible crimes let's check which gender kills more infants (not referring to abortion either).It doesn't contradict my point, I never said you hold massive influence, I just say that women will get criticized over throwaway comments the same way men would, except men also go on shooting sprees.
>You just pulled out of your assBro we really gonna pretend men are not committing more mass shootings than women? That they are no shootings/killings that happened recently that especially targeted women?
>you wanna talk about reprehensible crimes let's check which gender kills more infants (not referring to abortion either)Oh you mean the gender that takes the most care of infants kill the most infants? How surprising. Now let's look at who abuses and rapes the most infants. Oh wow, it's not even women?