music - /mu/ (#127105928) [Archived: 964 hours ago]

Bogdan
7/20/2025, 11:58:58 AM No.127105928
a3154171150_10
a3154171150_10
md5: ab784253f8bad11ffb81392532e61af7🔍
why everyone forgot about in rainbows disk 2?
don`t see it any tops or lists of radiohead music
Replies: >>127106044 >>127106415 >>127109800
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 12:01:19 PM No.127105945
Everyone on this board's a poser (except me), that's why they can't bring themselves to get acquainted with a band's full discog, even if they pretend to like a single album by them just because they've been made to believe it'll make them look as "in-the-know". Absolute brainless ROBOTS.
Replies: >>127108732
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 12:18:41 PM No.127106044
>>127105928 (OP)
Disc 2 is kinda like a good EP with some great songs, but I think In Rainbows is better simply because there’s more on there
>Bangers N Mash
fun and very relistenable, but not on the same level as Bodysnatchers
>Go Slowly
great, underrated
>Up On The Latter
great, the synths at the end sound cool, I could see this being on the main album
>Last Flowers
great
>4 Minute Warning
great, underrated
>Down Is The New Up
pretty good song
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 1:33:00 PM No.127106415
>>127105928 (OP)
because it almost sucks as much dick as thom yorke at an israeli gloryhole.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 7:41:14 PM No.127108732
>>127105945
True, y'all a bunch of fags, don't know shit about discography, radio culture...
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 9:26:21 PM No.127109800
>>127105928 (OP)
It's just not very good. I have it, but never listen to it. If we were to rate it as a proper Radiohead album, it would most certainly be at the bottom with Pablo Honey. I am rather surprised they decided to release it at all, considering how critical they are regarding their own work