1979. So much better than today

>>127114242 (OP)
just ignore the rampant indoor smoking awful scrap heap cars shit economy and super high crime rates

>>127114259
>just ignore the rampant indoor smoking

You are an absolute little weakling bitch you know that?

Ted Nugent is a pedophile

>>127114242 (OP)
We have adblocker now

>>127114259
also my country was in slavery of Russian occupation in 1979 so i would much prefer today to then

>>127114277
Now everyone is a faggot or simp that caters to women

>>127114291
>muh slavery
You are an absolute little weakling bitch you know that?

>>127114296
Not my problem chief

>>127114242 (OP)
For me? It's Blondie with Rockpile.

>>127114242 (OP)
>Nuge and AC/DC
benefit concert for the soon to be deaf

>>127114242 (OP)
cool kids never have the time

>>127114242 (OP)
Damn, Christgau would hate most of this lineup other than Blondie.

>>127114304
Gary Moore and a very special Les Paul.

>>127114242 (OP)
what would you go see?
me - Renaissance, Face Dancer, The Bongos, Talking Heads

>>127114242 (OP)
looks lame. late 70's are easily the worst 70's. mogged by mid 70's which in turn is mogged by early 70's

>>127114242 (OP)
unless you were alive in 1979 you can't really make that claim

>>127114620
Every decade has a good and a shitty half.

>>127114630
by that logic, you can't claim it was good

>>127114632
and early always seems to be the best. only exception i can think of is 60's

>>127114658
The first half of the 50s was definitely not the good part of it lol.

>>127114658
Usually because a decade's sounds are still fresh and they've become stale cliches by the end for example 1982 was a really strong year when the familiar 80s styles had appeared but weren't yet beaten into the ground.

>>127114673
i didn't even factor the 50's into consideration desu

>>127114685
yeah but one would assume that styles would be improved upon thus sound better as the decade goes on but instead it just peaks early

>>127114632
50-55 : bad
55-59: good

60-64 - bad
65-69 - good

70-74 - good
75-79 - bad

80-84 - good
85-89 - bad

90- 94 : good
95-99 : bad

00s-04: good
05-09 : bad

10-14: good
15-19 : really bad

2020s : well the first half is pretty shit so who knows if the next half will be better. Might be the first complete shit decade in a long time

>>127114242 (OP)
nostalgia is one of the most powerful drugs

>>127114913
>75-79 - bad
objectively wrong

>>127114928
All of the 60s and 70s were worthwhile really. I love the pre beatles era. But I guess one half is better than the other

>>127114913
based and objectivepilled
>>127114928
objectively, the early 70's are best

>>127114913
just for me personally, not generally:

late 00's > early 00's
late 10's > early 10's
early 20's = good

ok

I agree except I'd go to Japan to watch Fushitsusha and Les Rallizes Denudes instead of all this american dadrock shit.

>>127117705
or you know just wait for them to come to you instead

>>127117718
They didn't send their best

>>127114242 (OP)
>>127114512
Critics back then only loved CBGBs bands and The Clash.

>>127114876

>>127117760
>>127117629
Same Hollywood pop slop as the 50s had, just a different decade.

I'm not kidding either LA, NYC, and Nashville were not really any better then than today and everything good or innovative came from regional or indie labels.

>>127117770
Jerry Wexler was right when he said he hated that shit.

>>127114259
>rampant indoor smoking
I was alive and old enough to go to bars for the very end of indoor smoking in my state. I can't even imagine what it was like at a crowded indoor concert with half the crowd smoking cigarettes.

>>127115202
>objectively, the early 70's are best

Only if you care about boomer shit like rock. Disco (the real kind) was the musical peak of the 70's.

>>127117900
Problem is nobody except gays and Italians likes disco.

>>127117900
lol. sure.

>>127114242 (OP)
this would have been a cool period to live through after dodging the vietnam draft

>>127114242 (OP)
>talking heads and a bunch of dogshit