>>127136518 (OP)neither time.
all music critics are absolutely, totally useless.
interpol actually had some good songs though, bring this energy to the strokes
9.5 is right, 7.0 is not and probably just driven by their usual "please forgive us for enjoying white dude guitar music in the 00s, it was a different time" backpedaling
they were 0.5 points off the first time, which is not so bad. the second time, 3 points off. horrendous.
>>127136518 (OP)no, this is an absolute disgrace. its just a personal attack using the most cliched arguments to try and take down one of the most classic 2000s albums by far. you just know they were high fiving each other later after their epic win against the patriarchy or whatever
>>127136518 (OP)it’s a 10 if you’re vibing
it’s a 5 if you analyze it
>>127136518 (OP)>punishing heftMusic critics are all female, even more so the male ones
>>127137188the real reason wasn't politics but interpol being mid retard
>>127139620>interpol being mid retardAnd that's why current p4k gives higher ratings to much better music like Charli XCX and the 1975 right???
>>127136518 (OP)The author of that blurb looks like this, so you tell me
MY BEST FRIEND’S A BUTCHER HE HAS SIXTEEN KNIVES
>>127140296HE CARRIES THEM ALL OVER THE TOWN AT LEAST HE TRIES
>>127139822holy kek you know her ex was an interpol fan
It was good at the time, you had to be there