Was he a pedophile?

In a more enlightened time we would have furnished his bedchambers with a never-ending supply of sexy little boys

>>127153974 (OP)
No.

>>127153974 (OP)
he earned those kids

>>127153974 (OP)
I feel very conflicted about the while "situation", especially in regards to the people who do and don't think he's a pedophile. The people who think he's innocent are usually more well-learned, but tend to have very stupid and inconsiderate reasons to view him as innocent, such as Macaulay Kulkin and Corey Feldman's statements on him. While the people that think he's a pedo tend to have good reasons, they only get their information about MJ from shitty Netflix documentaries and tiktoks. Also they're usually dumber-than0average in general.

>>127153974 (OP)
he enjoyed the company of kids, yes

>>127154057
Retard. The people who think he's innocent are his obsessive fans who think he could do no wrong

>>127154070
I never stated otherwise. I think almost everyone I've seen give a take on it has been an idiot in some way. Maybe I just have bad luck.

>>127153974 (OP)
bitch made nigga so
yes

>>127153974 (OP)
It would explain a lot.

>>127153974 (OP)
There was probably a kid in his bed. that's weird.

was this before or after he was "married" to lisa marie. Dude was FUCKING. WEIRD.

NO

>>127153974 (OP)

>>127154057
I agree that neither side is particularly convincing.
>It was a big conspiracy to take him down because like...he was gonna bring peace to the world by doing a big concert or some shit. It's actually normal to sleep in your bed with kids, and these particular child celebrities said it didn't happen to them so it couldn't have happened to anyone, RIP MICHAEL "GOD" JACKSON
versus
>It's not suspicious at all that a bunch of stuff in Leaving Neverland turned out to be false because...it just isn't okay? The parents admitting to wanting every penny on the phone were clearly looking out for their kids' safety and nothing else!

>>127154447
This. MJ was weird, no doubt, but he was wise to the jew and not a pedo. They had him killed through their doctor prescribing him wildly dangerous medication for no reason.

>>127153974 (OP)
He's an ayuwoki.

>>127153974 (OP)
basically, what you're really asking is this:
was he abused as a kid
because all pedophiles/homosexuals were abused as kids and continue the cycle

and it is extremely likely he was looking at it from an objective point of view
there is an extremely high chance he was a pedophile

NOW, did he abuse children: that is harder to prove

>>127155036
what kind of retarded logic is that you fucking faggot?

>>127155050
spotted the homo

>>127155050
Gays reproduce by molesting children

>>127153974 (OP)
I think he was a manchild and possibly gay. There was something he was keeping closeted, because a guy in his position should have been drowning in pussy and fathering illegitimate children left right and center, but he wasn't.

He was completely innocent and there was absolutely nothing sexual about his rotating harem of little boys who he would sleep in the same bed as and give alcohol to and watch porn with and then get rid of them when they got older. Case closed!

No? Maybe? I don't know. He's dead.

>>127153974 (OP)
nah, my nigga is proven innocent.

>Why did Macaulay Culkin and Feldman ardently deny MJ's pedo allegations?
For most of his life MJ was very careful and calculating with his abuse. It's why he took in mistreated kids with emotionally unavailable parents who would do ANYTHING to get rich off their kid. He molested the invisible ones, not the famous kids.
>How was 13 year old Jordan Chandler able to accurately describe a birthmark on Jackson's penis but also erroneously say that Jackson was circumcised?
He only saw Jackson's dick when it was erect, retracting the foreskin and giving the false impression that he was circumcised. Pretty understandable for a dumb kid to get that wrong.

>>127153974 (OP)
He was a pedophile but he was innocent. Innocent because there is nothing wrong with being a pedophile.

>>127154447
>>127154820
>Jews concocted an elaborate false pedo narrative after MJ spoke out against their control over the industry.
You've got it completely backwards. Jews knew about the very real pedo stuff from the very beginning, they just allowed the public to find out about it. Look at Epstein and you'll realise that sexual blackmail is their preferred method of control. They didn't have to make anything up, they just showed the world who he really was.

>>127155654
no actually they did just make it up and used it to character assassinate him even though there was never evidence of any of it

>>127155651
kek

>>127155686
>Mountains of pedo behavior and pedo allegations that would make any reasonably intelligent person think "yeah I think that guy is most likely a pedo"
>there was never evidence of any of it
Are you black or retarded? Why do retards give MJ a pass for sleeping with little boys and showing them porn? Do you just like his music THAT much that you can't face the reality of the situation. If any other celeb had the sheer volume of allegations that MJ does, the world would unanimously agree that he was a chomo.

You may as well make up conspiracies that Jimmy Saville wasn't a pedo either, since there isn't a VHS or photo of him personally molesting a child.

>>127155737
Who cares? Little boys do gay stuff with each other all the time. How is it suddenly le worst thing ever if they happen to do it with an adult man instead?

>>127153986
This, just like Farinelli.

>>127155749
Alright buddy

>>127154820
>wise to the jew
/pol/ is so schizophrenic, I mean how would you describe Black or White, including the music video?

>>127155080
I've never heard about sexuality being a living organism that reproduces through behavioral memes. Tell me more

>>127153974 (OP)
Yes but I think it's multilayered. He didn't fuck The kids that were with him but he definitely flew out to preform rituals that involved rape with minors. U can't succeed without doing it

>>127153974 (OP)
the question is why would he risk touching a bunch of children who he knew would eventually go back to their parents, it just seems so unnecessarily risky, at least one of them would expose him, even accidentally, but thats not a real defense of course

I ask most people I get to know intimately this question and they say yes, everyone in my family says no though. I think most likely yes, Occam’s razor sort of deal