Anonymous
7/25/2025, 1:42:14 AM No.127162733
shouldn't this type 50 y.o. artifact be selling for at least $500? The damn thing cost $10 in 1978 for pete's sake.
Replies:
why aren't these specialty records worth more today? - /mu/ (#127162733) [Archived: 193 hours ago]
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 4:55:21 AM No.127164404
>>127162733 (OP)
Because picture discs are dogshit sound quality due to compromises that have to be made in manufacturing, especially older ones. And since everyone who's not retarded knows this, any QC effort goes into making sure the picture looks good.
TL;DR They're for looking at, not for playing.
Because picture discs are dogshit sound quality due to compromises that have to be made in manufacturing, especially older ones. And since everyone who's not retarded knows this, any QC effort goes into making sure the picture looks good.
TL;DR They're for looking at, not for playing.
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 5:28:30 AM No.127164726
>>127162733 (OP)
This picture disc is a repress the first pressing is a different recording. Also one of the most common picture discs to find.
This picture disc is a repress the first pressing is a different recording. Also one of the most common picture discs to find.
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 5:31:17 AM No.127164749
>>127162733 (OP)
Supply and demand
Supply and demand
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 5:39:25 AM No.127164817
>>127162733 (OP)
Collectors already own "the Collector's Edition" LOL. But the market isn't for the collector, it's for the casual, and casuals just know the regular versions of things.
Collectors already own "the Collector's Edition" LOL. But the market isn't for the collector, it's for the casual, and casuals just know the regular versions of things.
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 5:56:55 AM No.127164981
VG+ means pops and hisses over every second of it
and god help you if a record is only "GOOD"
and god help you if a record is only "GOOD"