New tame impala track just dropped, need it or keep it?
I think it's decent
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulkdUfItyxI

>>127166121 (OP)
Meh. If this is the lead single for a new album I suspect It'll follow in Currents and The Slow Rush's footsteps where I like a couple songs and forget all the rest.

>>127166121 (OP)
Hah, I just listened to Currents on my way to work after a year or so and now find this.

A bit disappointing, no? A very basic rhythm, simplistic melody - if you can call that - and not much development. It only starts getting interesting after the 4 min mark, then the video cuts the best moment. If this was anyone else, I'd drop listening after the first 30 seconds. This is a bit like Jamie XX but not as captivating.

>>127166121 (OP)
>music video only, no pure audio track released
Hate this

>>127166185
was thinking Jamie XX too. It's okay. I actually just revisited The Slow Rush and I like it. I didn't like at first. maybe this new song will grow on me.
>>127166230
nah the track is on streaming already

Innerspeaker will always be the best one

I think it's okay.
I'm kind of surprised how many people are not just disliking it but seem to be actively seething about it (not here) crying that it's not like lonerism. Nigga he hasn't done shit like lonerism for a decade

>>127167646
Yeah listen to 'Runway Houses City Clouds' and then come back and listen to this tuneless doof doof kaka for normies. How the mighty have fallen indeed.

it's shit

>>127166121 (OP)
It’s good.