During Billy corgans podcast, his guest Elliot Mintz ask billy, who he considers "one of a kind".
Billy, with a straight face, says that taylor swift and Billie elish are "one of a kind"
Why does he feel that he has to surrender to the woke mob, and prop up industry puppets like Billie elish and taylor swift? He clearly thinks that they're god awful shit, so why lie.

>mentions 2 generational talents
>WHY IS HE MAKING IT POLITICAL?

>>127293426
Billie elish is not a generational talent. Taylor swift is a generational talent but the others that he listed in the interview are not except.

>>127293426
He could pick anyone and picks 2 pop sluts for little girls

>>127293375 (OP)
>the woke mob
update your script

>>127293451
dozens of top tier gen-x artists have praised Billie, like Thom Yorke and Dave Grohl. She's obviously the top gen-z artist in the world right now.

>>127293460
Lol exactly. He's also bull shiting , because he's put on the spot of naming Modern one of a kind generational talent, but he doesn't know any modern stuff because he thinks they're all shit.

>>127293460
you'd rather him give NPC answers naming some boomer band that doesn't make music anymore or do you want him to give a different answer and name people who are in the peak right now?

>>127293477
Those artists also told me to get vaccinated or lose my job. Dave Grohl will praise whoever record labels tell him to praise.

>>127293504
>sold out tours
>top album of 2024
>most streamed song of 2024
>doesn't sing typical pop-slop
>not considered top tier attractive so music is even more impactful

What else is she supposed to do to make you consider her praiseworthy?

>>127293490
How about he says that he keeps track on some indie music like Mamoth or other niche Rock bands, but the truth is that music is pretty dying out after being raped by the evil people in the industry. Instead he continues the decline and selling out of music by promoting generic ass industry puppet billy elish and weinstein slut Lana del ray.
He didn't mention cool shit like, chief keef or young thug. I'm not the biggest hop fan but those people are actually affecting the music industry.

Billy Corgan is a bald illuminati reptile of course he's going to throw a bone to fellow reptilians Taylor Swift and Billie Eilish

>>127293584
Meds

wtf is this esl shillbot buzzword circlejerk

>>127293624
I'm op. Give me some slack on my lazy post. I'm just bored and stoned and still a little angry after hearing billy corgan praise that industry puppet Billie elish. I Don't understand why billy, who's one of my favorite musicians, lie about liking elish.

>>127293490
Those are the most npc fucking answers you can give idiot

>>127293375 (OP)
Still zero good songs. Still a OHW novelty act.

>>127293504
This. All artists are shills and whores. Smashing Pumpkins got $8.6 million from Pandemic funds.

>>127293562
Say no to Big Pharma.

>>127293375 (OP)
Older artists are instructed to name drop these new artists in order to boost their credibility

>>127297045
>Older artists are instructed to name drop these new artists in order to boost their credibility
How it does that I can't imagine though. If anything should be the complete opposite.

didnt know butterbean had a podcast

>>127293567
Billy just never really liked Hip Hop even if he will wank a rapper if they mention him as an influence

If he listens to Spaceghostburrp with an Open Mind he would probably love it but in the end of the day that would require him to let go of his "ick" about Rap

>>127297052
It doesn't but they get paid to shill them.

>>127293567
>He didn't mention cool shit like, chief keef or young thug. I'm not the biggest hop fan but those people are actually affecting the music industry.
t. Fantano

>>127297045
>>127297101
Ok but he should at least be honest. I don't care if he shills Shillie but he should at least say "Apple Music is paying me to do this."

He's just attaching his name to them to create some kind of "lineage of great songwriters" that he's a part of

>>127297052
you guys are wrong though the industry is way more consolidated in modern times so more than half of all dadrockers are owned by UMG so they're obliged to also shill Billie Eilish because they're all owed by the same megacorp it's not like Frank Sinatra shitting on rock and rollers in 1957 because they were in a completely different musical ecosystem than himself.

>>127297234
Didn't Geffen manufacture a beef between Nirvana and GNR back in the day despite them being labelmates?

>>127297234
It's always been pretty fucking consolidated into a few companies barring about 15-20 years in the 50s-60s when the music industry really decentralized. That was a fluke not the norm.

>>127297234
>because they were in a completely different musical ecosystem than himself.
Elvis and Bill Haley were signed to RCA and Decca. (^: