>>128338784
>Just your experience will be gone. The objective reality will always exist, just not in the form a human experiences it. It will just be undefined, uncategorised and meaningless, but not non-existant.
I'm not sure what is to "exist" or what is "reality". Sometimes I think empiricism is the case. Not that I'm sure of it. But if you're not experiencing anything, how could you know or prove that anything exists?
>Why do you assume you can move from thid body?
Because if changes are real, I could become another completely different object in another point of the universe.
>You are this body.
Maybe now, but who knows what I will be after all the changes this body will undergo? Today I'm a dude. Some time after my death I can be an ant, a fish. My body is already not the same as it was ten seconds ago. It changes, becomes something else... Who knows where I'll end up?
>Are you trying to say that because the universe needs to be observed to exist according to you, that you will start to experience the perception of another body after death?
Yes, and that new body could be related materially or not to my current one. That is, it could be a continuation of all particles that once were me (like my ashes getting dispersed here and there), or simply "me waking up in another person's body", although I have no idea how this second option might happen.