Thread 2048022 - /n/ [Archived: 347 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/10/2025, 3:56:50 AM No.2048022
5673124908132
5673124908132
md5: 97fba1583cef5b6ace4276cd993b934d🔍
>walkable cities
Replies: >>2048023
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 4:05:45 AM No.2048023
Screenshot 2025-07-09 220451
Screenshot 2025-07-09 220451
md5: 4d6bd235d1f1b558893ebe78ed744b32🔍
>>2048022 (OP)
>NNNNOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T BUILD A SOULFUL VEHICLELESS WALKABLE CITY
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 4:05:49 AM No.2048024
urbanists need to fuck off, but "ironic" basedjak threads aren't any better
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 6:01:55 AM No.2048035
Every city on Earth is already "walkable", so at face value this is a completely meaningless, loaded term that opens itself up to genuine schizos that think having to walk across a single intersection automatically makes a city unwalkable. It attracts some genuinely unhinged, scelerophobic limp-wrists that never go outside and think all public infrastructure should cater exclusively to their needs. To call a spade a spade, the reason they don't like cars is simple; cars are fast. That's it. All their grievances against motor vehicles always derives from the fact that cars are capable of going faster than 30 miles per hour. They genuinely think people should not be allowed to go faster than bicycles, and any city that facilitates vehicle traffic is automatically branded a "car-centric" city as a result. It's honestly some of the most depraved shit I've ever seen
Replies: >>2048053
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 6:10:13 AM No.2048036
file
file
md5: 4fe12db3cbde9436a539c2ed1e84eb1a🔍
Replies: >>2048037
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 6:11:24 AM No.2048037
>>2048036
These AI slop memes are going to age poorly when everyone has EVs
Replies: >>2048038
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 6:15:14 AM No.2048038
>>2048037
you need 9 gallons of gasoline on a gas charger to charge a 5000 pound battery bank on 4 wheels
Replies: >>2048039
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 6:16:19 AM No.2048039
>>2048038
Nope, not when you have solar, and charging your car at home is hardly the same as your strawman anyways
Replies: >>2048040
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 6:17:16 AM No.2048040
>>2048039
moving around the 5000 pouunds of weight.

Move 50 pounds on flat terrain.

Now move a 5000 pound gas chamber up hill.
Replies: >>2048041
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 6:18:33 AM No.2048041
>>2048040
have a coherent thought

make sense

take your meds

see I can do this too
Replies: >>2048042
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 6:19:22 AM No.2048042
file
file
md5: 2a1588d8bdafc7f780b232d7997f378c🔍
charge a cybertruck with a solar palen xD

>>2048041
Take your meds was part of Aktion T4

Have a keubel wagen
Replies: >>2048043
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 6:23:26 AM No.2048043
>>2048042
>charge a cybertruck with a solar palen xD
A lot of people do this. My neighbors have solar roofs and those tesla walls in their garage and one of those chargers on their driveway that I always see their truck parked on. I think the biggest limitation to this though is geographic location, some areas get more sunlight than others. If I lived in a frozen shithole like Canada for example I don't think solar would be a viable option, even in sunlight there's simply less UV available
Replies: >>2048044 >>2048045
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 6:27:13 AM No.2048044
>>2048043
lots of white people burn the resources of 100 people. It's part of blitzkrieg combat.

Currently struggling to find 40 lithium cells to restore my mobility.

White people
> I need 4000 for "safety"

GIVE US THE LITHIUM
LET US BURN WHATS LEFT OF THE LITHIUM
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 6:40:09 AM No.2048045
>>2048043
Why is it so important you charge it with a solar panels when you can just plug it into the grid
Replies: >>2048047
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 6:58:38 AM No.2048047
>>2048045
It's not, the schizos argument is that EVs are still responsible for greenhouse gas emissions, which is already a retarded argument. My point is that you can just bypass this if you charge via solar, but it seems as though his argument is now that the manufacture of EVs releases gas now, which is a moot argument since the manufacture of bicycles also results in greenhouse gases albeit far less
Replies: >>2048054
Anonymous
7/10/2025, 7:57:17 AM No.2048053
>>2048035
This is your brain on oil addiction
super schizo 64
7/10/2025, 8:06:11 AM No.2048054
file
file
md5: a5d7ec948057ababdbcf334e992ea2d1🔍
>>2048047

>farts
>grunts
>sweat
For each scenario:

1.push 50 pounds of weight on flat terrain

2.now push 50 pounds of weight up hill.

now...

3.Push 5000 pounds of weight on flat terrain.

[You need 100 of you to do that]

4.now push 5000 pound battery bank up hill with 100 friends.

The fuel source is hidden but that 5000 pounds is still there. expose the fuel source. 40 lithium cells in stead of 4000 of them! Blitzkrieg combat costs 100 times as much!

The invisible labor of those 100 people.... Are the 100 people the untermenschen??

The invisible labor of 100 people?