https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/trump-pardons-todd-julie-chrisley-what-know-about-reality-tv-stars.amp

reality TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley were freed from prison after they received a pardon from President Donald Trump on Wednesday.

Todd and Julie were sentenced to 12 and 7 years, respectively, for bank fraud and tax evasion in 2022.

The couple was convicted of conspiring to defraud community banks out of more than $30 million in fraudulent loans as well as tax evasion

The couple was initially indicted in August 2019, and a new indictment was later filed. They were found guilty in June 2022 of not only bank fraud and tax evasion, but also conspiring to defraud the IRS.

In the original filing, both Chrisleys were charged with one count of conspiracy to commit bank fraud, five counts of bank fraud, one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States and one count of tax fraud. Julie Chrisley was also charged with one count of wire fraud and one count of obstruction of justice.

Prosecutors found the couple guilty of submitting fake documents to banks when applying for loans.

Steal 30 million? No problem, Trump has stolen much more so he has your back. Borrow 20k to go to college? He is coming to put you in jail.

The banks need to launch a state lawsuit against these people. Wait till Das Furyer has 1 yr left in term to avoid revenge

>>1408588 (OP)
Todd Chrisley is a closeted homosexual

Remember when Biden pardoned 50 people that hadn't even been convicted of crimes?

>>1408708
it's almost like he was protecting them from the current lying fascist at the head of the executive

>>1408708
>What about this other thing?
Are you even mentally capable of arguing in good faith, or has that part of your brain atrophied away?

>>1408709
You can't accept a pardon unless you first accept your guilt, retard-kun

>>1408713
well since trump thinks agreeing with reality is a crime, i guess that's what they're pardoned for

>>1408713
Tell that to Steve Bannon

>>1408714
Uh oh libshit melty
Are you a legal citizen? We should probably check.

>>1408716
how many posts before you expose your lack of english proficiency, i wonder

>>1408588 (OP)
>Borrow 20k to go to college? He is coming to put you in jail.
Actually, dRumpf deferred interest on most student loans.
I don't believe you can be arrested for student loans as the US isn't a Communist country.

>>1408714
Anon, if trump *really* thought this he'd be arresting the entire Republican party for agreeing that biden's been too senile to be president since at least 2022

>>1408721
this is a thread about trump being corrupt, shill faggot. you can try to change the narrative but reality remains reality

>>1408709
>>1408710
Remember when the Democrats charged Trump with 90 fake felonies

>>1408729
thanks for proving that you literally believe reality is fake

>>1408729
>asking the governor to find 11000 votes is fake

>>1408730
>It's only okay when Democrats do it
>>1408731
>20 million votes missing

>>1408732
you're too mentally ill to hold conversation with, you should consult a medical professional

>>1408731
>>1408733
Don't you have another primary you need to rig for the DNC?
Oh wait, I guess that's still a bit of a ways out

the shill is just burning through his predetermined talking points isn't he

>>1408733
>>1408737
I don't have conversations with shills suffering from TDS. Trump can pardon whoever he wants because Biden's pardons were on another level of corruption. Keep coping

>>1408743
of course we don't converse, you're not american

>>1408743
>Trump can pardon whoever he wants because Biden's pardons were on another level of corruption.
Alright, listen up jack, because I'm gonna only tell you this once.
US law is sacred. It maintains order in this country, and one of those sets of laws is the US tax code.
These taxes are important. They are used to subsidize great swaths of US industry.
Every time some scheming, conniving midwestern couple cheats on their taxes, they aren't just depriving money from the IRS. They're depriving money from the American corporations.
What are you going to tell that poor CEO of the Coca-Cola company when his tax rebate won't be enough to place another bottling plant on the last remaining freshwater spring in Mexico? His heart will break into a million microplastic pieces.
Just because Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. (peace be upon him) used his son to procure handies from third world energy magnates doesn't mean he's corrupt. He's doing what any other God-fearing, abortion-inducing democrat would do. He's simply looking to fill his pockets to the brim and get out while he still can. And isn't that what America's all about? Isn't that why migrants come here every single day?
We need to be considerate for the fact that, despite being afflicted with crippling bone cancer and dementia for six years, this man still had a heart of gold. And that gold is somewhere in an offshore bank account, ready and waiting for his family once they flee the country after it begins to collapse.

>>1408751
Alright, “DNC Shillbot 9000” — let’s pause for a second and acknowledge the irony of hiding behind a name that sounds like it was churned out by a satire generator. Maybe that’s not even your real handle, and maybe that’s fitting, because what you just posted doesn’t come off as serious either.

You talk about taxes like they're sacred — like the IRS is some kind of temple and cheating on your taxes is a mortal sin. But let’s not pretend taxes are a holy sacrament. They're not divine law; they’re state-mandated extractions. And most of them don’t go to help the poor, fix our schools, or protect the environment — they go to bail out massive corporations, bankroll endless wars, and feed a bureaucratic machine that’s more concerned with power than people.

You’re shedding crocodile tears over corporations not getting tax rebates? Please. These same corporations stash billions offshore, lay off workers, and pump toxins into communities — all while being handed subsidies paid for by people barely scraping by. And you’re upset because someone in the Midwest tried to hold on to a little more of what they earned?

If you really believe the moral high ground is siding with multinational conglomerates and corrupt political dynasties, then maybe it’s not the tax code that’s broken — maybe it’s your compas

>>1408751
>We need to be considerate for the fact that, despite being afflicted with crippling bone cancer and dementia for six years, this man still had a heart of gold. And that gold is somewhere in an offshore bank account
gem

>>1408713
>You can't accept a pardon unless you first accept your guilt, retard-kun
None of those people have formally accepted those pardons.

That's actually a thing you have to do in court. Until and unless those people get charged for something for which they are pardoned and invoke the pardon in court, those pardons have not been accepted by them.

A pardon merely existing does not mean it has been accepted by the intended recipient. That's a formal legal process.

>>1408771
>They're not divine law
You care about divine law?

>>1408751
>US law is sacred
Stopped reading there. The Democrats just spent the past eight years breaking the law. You're only mad that it's your turn to get fucked now

>>1408775
>None of those people have formally accepted those pardons.
Why would the president issue a pardon to somebody if they weren't guilty of a crime?

Real head-scratcher, there.

>>1408785
Yeah bro, it's satire.

>>1408791
>Why would the president issue a pardon to somebody if they weren't guilty of a crime?
Presidents don't decide who is and is not guilty of a crime. We have courts for that.

If you meant why would presidents issue a pardon to someone they didn't think was guilty of a crime, there's plenty of precedent of presidents and governors pardoning people they believed were innocent (or were factually known to be innocent even though they had been found legally guilty). Pardons are faster and easier to obtain than formal exonerations and carry many of the same benefits. This is commonly done, for example, with people who have died since their conviction and can therefore no longer be exonerated in court.

Since people that haven't been convicted yet can't be exonerated, a pardon would be the only recourse for a president seeking to provide relief to charges for someone they believed innocent.

I'm glad I could answer your dumbass attempt at a gotcha question.

>>1408794
>Presidents don't decide who is and is not guilty of a crime.
They still grant pardons to those they suspect of being guilty of such, and would need to admit guilt in order for the pardon to be validated.

You're also forgetting that guilt doesn't only exist in a legal context, and the necessity of granting a pardon to someone who hasn't been convicted of a crime is preceded by the reasonable assumption that they have committed a crime regardless.

>>1408785
Which laws did Democrats supposedly break, according to you? (this should be hilarious)

>>1408801
First amendment.
>nooo, you can't question elections, that's a threat democracy!
lol okay fag

>>1408799
>They still grant pardons to those they suspect of being guilty of such, and would need to admit guilt in order for the pardon to be validated.
Yes. And? These people have not admitted guilt other than Hunter Biden, who was guilty.

>You're also forgetting that guilt doesn't only exist in a legal context
I'm not forgetting that. I bring up legal vs factual guilt in that post.

>and the necessity of granting a pardon to someone who hasn't been convicted of a crime is preceded by the reasonable assumption that they have committed a crime regardless.
Why is that assumption reasonable either generally or in this specific case where we're dealing with a vindictive, serially corrupt felon who has a long history of targeting his political enemies with bogus legal proceedings? You can't just say shit and have it be true. As often as pardons are used to correct past injustices, I wouldn't even say that'd be a reasonable assumption if we weren't dealing with the orange shit stain.

Accepting a pardon can be used as evidence of guilt, but being pardoned cannot.

>>1408802
Ahh the debunked election stealing conspiracy, the originators of which agreed was totally fake. Got it.

>MIGAtard has no way to justify pardons to people who blatantly attempted to defraud the United States
>"what about biden's pardons???"
It keeps happening, you love to see it.

>>1408804
Yeah it was so dangerous and fake that they had to arrest Trump's legal counsel.

Sure is weird how democrats keep persecuting Americans for exercising their constitutionally protected rights.

>>1408825
>arrest Trump's legal counsel
this almost sounds concerning, until you realize its a retarded shill deliberately not telling you what they were arrested for
The fact that its the local schizo shilling it is also basically a guarantee they deserved to be arrested. I don't even have to look it up.

>>1408826
Here's the facts, jack: Legal counsel is necessarily required to defend their clients with zeal, even if their clients are retarded.

Disbarring, investigating, and summarily charging them in retaliation because they defended the constitutionally protected speech of their client against the scrutiny of the fed is just about as anti-American as you can get.

>>1408825
>>1408827
Do we need to paste Sidney Powell's speech disavowing the conspiracy theories again?

>>1408827
>Disbarring, investigating, and summarily charging them in retaliation because they defended the constitutionally protected speech of their client against the scrutiny
So thats your shill lie, why were they really disbarred?

>>1408832
Ask Grok

Hey Grok, some dipshit is pretending that a Trump lawyer got disbarred just for defending their client. Why are they a lying piece of shit?

The claim that a Trump lawyer was disbarred "just for defending their client" is misleading and oversimplifies the situation. Several lawyers associated with former President Donald Trump’s legal efforts, particularly those related to challenging the 2020 election results, have faced disbarment or sanctions, but not simply for representing him. The reasons typically involve professional misconduct, such as making false or misleading statements, filing frivolous lawsuits, or engaging in actions deemed unethical under legal ethics rules. Here’s why the claim doesn’t hold up:

Rudy Giuliani: Disbarred in New York and Washington, D.C., for making "demonstrably false and misleading statements" about the 2020 election, including baseless claims of widespread voter fraud. Courts found he misused his position as Trump’s attorney to undermine the electoral process, violating ethical obligations. This wasn’t about defending a client but about advancing unfounded claims without evidence.

John Eastman: A California judge recommended disbarment in March 2024 for knowingly making false statements about election irregularities to support Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. His actions, including a memo suggesting Vice President Pence could delay electoral vote certification, were seen as violating California’s ethics rules by promoting baseless theories. He’s appealing, but the issue is his conduct, not just client representation.

Sidney Powell: Faced sanctions and disciplinary actions (though not yet disbarred) for filing lawsuits with baseless claims, like alleging a computer algorithm manipulated votes. She pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges in Georgia for election interference, agreeing to testify against co-defendants. Her actions went beyond zealous advocacy to misrepresenting facts in court.

Kenneth Chesebro: Had his law license suspended in New York after pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit filing false documents in Georgia’s election interference case. His role in the "fake electors" scheme wasn’t standard legal defense but an attempt to subvert election results, violating ethical standards.

Michael Cohen: Disbarred in New York in 2019 for crimes including lying to Congress and campaign finance violations tied to his work for Trump (e.g., hush money payments). His disbarment stemmed from criminal conduct, not just representing Trump.

The American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct (adopted by most states) prohibit lawyers from knowingly making false statements, filing frivolous claims, or engaging in dishonest conduct. These lawyers faced consequences for actions like submitting unverified or false claims, not for simply defending Trump. Critics of these disciplinary actions, like some on X, argue they’re politically motivated, but courts and bar associations have cited specific ethical violations, not just unpopular client representation.

Claiming they were disbarred "just for defending their client" ignores the documented misconduct. It’s a lazy distortion, often pushed to frame these lawyers as victims of political persecution rather than professionals held accountable for unethical behavior. Always dig into the specifics—courts don’t disbar people for doing their job properly.

>>1408838
>>1408839
#BTFO

>>1408708
the fact that you bring it up is the reason he had to do it.

>>1408838
>The reasons typically involve professional misconduct, such as making false or misleading statements
Are you actually stupid
They were using the first amendment to criticize the government's ability to conduct an election, the government countered with a tactical 'nuh-uh' and then disbarred them citing the previous 'nuh-uh' as evidence that they were lying.
This would be like the police arresting you because you brought evidence of police brutality to the precinct.

>>1408898
you're not american and should stop ban evading or posting

>>1408900
https://archive.palanq.win/news/search/text/%22you%27re%20not%20american%22/

Go away, obsessive retard.

>>1408903
don't get mad at me lolcow, stop being such a cringe inducing faggot

>>1408904
>lolcow
You've been doing this for more than a year.

>>1408908
and you're here every day because presumably you're a literal paid shill. i just come here to make fun of you on occasion because you're an easy target and your lies are easily refutable

>>1408903
Honestly he should be banned for spamming, his spamming is very excessive

>>1408910
you can stop samefagging, and i'm sure you and all your various ips already reported me, spamming faggot

>>1408911
Would you actually take your meds and stop spamming if I gave you a screenshot?
No, you would not

>>1408911
>you and all your various ips
Lol I had to read this again, haha I did a double take.
You really are schizophrenic lmao.

>>1408912
it's funny how much i distract you from your agenda with just a few words

>>1408915
Trust me, you can flood the zone with shit all you want, I find it hilarious laughing at you as you mistake everyone online who disagrees with you as being just a single person rotating thru a infinite pool of IPs apparently for the sole purpose of trolling specifically you.

Everyday you become more unhinged, personally, I've enjoyed watching your descent into madness

>>1408923
i doubt you even believe your lies faggot

>>1408588 (OP)
Can somebody remind me what percentage of Trumps pardons in his first term were Jewish, again?

>>1408996
https://forward.com/news/462516/here-are-the-notable-jews-who-were-pardoned-by-president-trump/

>>1409016
>>1409016
That's only the first term, the list for the second term is longer and keeps growing.

>>1408996
>>1409046
so it was anti-semitism, propagated by China who is losing the war currently. Let's see how badly they want to westernize in the coming months as it gets worst and casualties increase. Allying with Japan was a S+ move by the USA and Japan.

>>1408588 (OP)
The real bitch of this is that these pardons also ABSOLVE THEIR FUCKING RESPONSIBILITY TO REIMBURSE THE VICTIMS. Meaning all the people and organizations they scammed will now never get their money back because a ton of these pardon recipients didn't even complete paying them back, and now never have to.