This makes him look weak, small, and all the republicans who voted for him now have to look and see at this thing that just happened.

Here are several sources:
https://cnbc.com
https://msnbc.com
https://abc7.com
https://washingtonpost.com
https://thehill.com

Look at how this specific thing happened, do you now see why you were wrong and we were right? Every single thing he says is a lie and everything we say is the truth. I don't misunderstand any of this, I am objective and understand geopolitics and have no agenda to mislead.

Also Appeals court allows for Trump tariffs to move ahead, or something.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/live-blog/trump-administration-elon-tariffs-medicaid-immigration-live-updates-rcna209644

bro do you think maybe you should paste the article instead of making the OP a vehicle for your spite for those reading it just a thought

>>1408781
It's my first time in this board, I was just testing the waters.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/federal-appeals-court-temporarily-pauses-rulings-trump-tariffs-allowin-rcna209842

A federal appeals court Thursday temporarily paused rulings by a panel of judges that halted several of President Donald Trump’s tariffs[0] on international trading partners.

The “judgments and the permanent injunctions entered by the Court of International Trade in these cases are temporarily stayed until further notice,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said in a brief ruling[1].

The decision pauses the lower court’s decision[2] until at least June 9, when both sides will have submitted legal arguments about whether the case should remain paused while the appeal proceeds.

An attorney for the plaintiffs, Jeffrey Schwab of the Liberty Justice Center, said in a statement that the ruling is “merely a procedural step as the court considers the government’s request for a longer stay pending appeal.”

“We are confident the Federal Circuit will ultimately deny the government’s motion,” Schwab said.

Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, told Fox News that "this is a big victory for the president." "We're very pleased with the ruling," he said.


[0] https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/trump-tariffs-court-ruling-which-tariffs-are-still-in-place-rcna209738
[1] https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cafc.23105/gov.uscourts.cafc.23105.7.0_1.pdf
[2] https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/court-international-trade-rules-against-trump-tariffs-rcna209627

>>1408786
Peter Navarro, the White House senior counsel for trade and manufacturing, predicted the administration would find a way to institute the tariffs even if it's eventually unsuccessful in this case.

“Even if we lose, we will do it another way,” Navarro said, because Trump has multiple options to keep the tariffs in place. He said U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer would lay out how the administration will respond within the next two days.

The judgment Wednesday was from the U.S. Court of International Trade, which typically hears cases that originate from around the country involving tariff classifications, import transactions and customs law issues.

The administration had been trying to have challenges to the tariffs heard in that court, but after the ruling, senior White House adviser Stephen Miller accused the New York City-based court of engaging in a "judicial coup."

In its decision, a panel of three judges — made up of Reagan, Obama and Trump appointees — found that the decades-old International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a federal law that Trump cited in many of his executive orders, didn’t “delegate an unbounded tariff authority to the President.”

Trump described the appeals court's pause as fortunate and took aim at the lower court's three-judge panel in a Truth Social post[4] on Thursday.

“Where do these initial three Judges come from? How is it possible for them to have potentially done such damage to the United States of America? Is it purely a hatred of 'TRUMP?',” Trump wrote.

Trump appointed one of the three judges who heard this case, Judge Timothy M. Reif, who took the bench in 2019.


[4] https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114593880455063168

>>1408786
>my first time in this board, I
glad to break your cherry, /news/ virgin. What is your native language?

>>1408789
֍

>>1408780 (OP)
>Trump did a thing that's really really bad and it made him look like a humiliated fool
AGAIN?!?!?

>>1408780 (OP)
Just accept that he's a retard like the rest of them