Trump thanks Elon Musk for stopping transgender mice, Elon also had a black eye for some reason - /news/ (#1409001) [Archived: 1070 hours ago]

Anonymous
5/31/2025, 1:58:54 PM No.1409001
1744312459209068
1744312459209068
md5: 2c55b00021f550dd31ebfa0faca13e25🔍
https://www.latintimes.com/trump-pushes-debunked-theory-transgender-mice-he-thanks-musk-his-service-584096
In a press briefing on Friday President Donald Trump praised billionaire Elon Musk for his contributions to DOGE, citing a debunked claim that the government had been funding scientific research to make "transgender mice."

Trump referenced $8 million in federal funding supposedly saved by DOGE when the agency halted efforts to make "mice transgender."

"They spent $8 million on making mice transgender, and those are better than many of the others," Trump said. "I could sit here all day and read things just like that, but we have other things to do."

The comments come months after Americans for Medical Progress issued a formal statement clarifying the nature of the research Trump was referring to. According to scientists, the studies in question have nothing to do with gender identity or transitioning animals, but rather investigate how hormones function in development and disease. Many of these studies involve mice models to better understand conditions like endometriosis, infertility, breast cancer, and prostate cancer.

"Misrepresenting this work will hinder our ability to protect our children and weaken progress toward improving the health and well-being of all individuals, regardless of background or belief," the statement said.

The White House posted a rebuttal to fact checkers that remains live on the White House website as Trump continues to amplify the claim.
Replies: >>1409007 >>1409032
Anonymous
5/31/2025, 2:27:20 PM No.1409002
I get that republicans are pro death, but why can't they start with themselves like that IVF bomber?
Replies: >>1409115
Anonymous
5/31/2025, 4:14:30 PM No.1409007
>>1409001 (OP)
>Black eye
trump's pecker? Gotta be more careful going down
tranny rodent(tranrodent)
5/31/2025, 8:07:19 PM No.1409030
Mickey and Minnie mice get to where each other's clothing...... Which is twice as Nice
Replies: >>1409038
Anonymous
5/31/2025, 8:52:55 PM No.1409032
>>1409001 (OP)
Thats not even the real story
The actual question needs to be, what sort of drugs is Musk on?
https://bsky.app/profile/cwebbonline.com/post/3lqgt4jyp522z
Replies: >>1409039
Anonymous
5/31/2025, 9:50:27 PM No.1409038
>>1409030
>where
fuck off, ESL faggot
Anonymous
5/31/2025, 9:51:28 PM No.1409039
>>1409032
hey, I have the same reaction whenever Trump talks. It's the normal reaction to gibberish.
Anonymous
6/1/2025, 4:41:08 AM No.1409114
Remember when Pence got a black eye during Trump's first term? But yeah, it was totally Elon's kid. Sure.
Anonymous
6/1/2025, 4:51:24 AM No.1409115
>>1409002
Republicans don't kill babies for being inside of a mother's body as opposed to being outside of one; that would be a Democrat's favorite hill to die on
Replies: >>1409189
Anonymous
6/1/2025, 9:29:08 PM No.1409189
>>1409115
>Republicans don't kill babies for being inside of a mother's body
Right. You just ensure the mother is hungry and sick and if the pregnancy even makes it to term, the baby will be too.

Go ride your high horse off a cliff.
Replies: >>1409308
Anonymous
6/2/2025, 10:18:18 AM No.1409283
Did Musk impregnate Katie Miller?
Anonymous
6/2/2025, 6:25:53 PM No.1409308
>>1409189
>Riding his high horse, he unleashes a vicious attack against a defenseless strawman.
Baby killers have no moral high ground, BTW.
The evidence is that you literally support killing babies.
Quit posting and go back to killing small animals.
Replies: >>1409331
Anonymous
6/2/2025, 8:01:28 PM No.1409331
>>1409308
>Baby killers have no moral high ground, BTW.
I've never killed a baby which is more than I can say for Republican policies.

>The evidence is that you literally support killing babies.
Nah. I don't even support abortion. But given the choice between a legal abortion and a back alley abortion, I'd absolutely rather people go with the latter. And that ultimately is what the choice is, banning abortion doesn't prevent abortions. You just want people to put themselves at risk physically and legally for nothing but your desire to hurt others.

>Quit posting and go back to killing small animals.
Keep me out of your violent fantasies.

Anyway, you wouldn't know moral high ground from a hole in the ground. Don't you have a clinic to be bombing?
Replies: >>1409480
Anonymous
6/3/2025, 5:50:46 AM No.1409480
>>1409331
>You just want people to put themselves at risk
No state in the US has banned abortions, retard. Your fantasy of back alley abortions doesn't exist.
Replies: >>1409644
Anonymous
6/4/2025, 4:14:50 AM No.1409644
>>1409480
>No state in the US has banned abortions
Dumb bot hasn't had its script updated in years. Shame.