FUCK YOU AOC! FUCK YOU!

Who let you out of the kitchen huh? You commented about Trump to be impeached, while you don't realize that Donald is the warrior, the best man in the world, and in America to end the terror once and for all?

A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN HER HOME! GO BACK TO YOUR FUCKING KITCHEN, you piece of SHIT!

I'm from Vietnam and let me tell you, AOC (or the Piece of Shit Cortez), I have BEATEN my mom a lot of times for disrespecting men rule, no bullshit. And the Vietnamese government isn't woke to care about women rights.

FUCK YOU

Source: https://thenationaldesk.com/news/nation-world/aoc-calls-for-trumps-impeachment-after-strikes-on-iran-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-democrat-reaction (WTF???)

>>1415146 (OP)
>Trump joins a war
>Sinclair Broadcasting can't help but attack AOC
kek

>>1415146 (OP)
I'm still voting straight republican if the dems run her or Newsom in 2028.

>>1415282
You're straight retarded

>>1415146 (OP)
Dumb, mad, and brainwashed. Classic combo.

>>1415282
Bro I want to vote Democrat again. Republicans don't have anyone worth voting for, and haven't for quite some time, and the candidates the DNC keep rigging their primaries in favor of are stooges. Look at Biden for fucks sake, dude probably didn't make a single decision his entire term other than what flavor pudding he wanted for dinner. Hogg tried to fix this sort of thing and they ousted him.

I really want a Democrat worth voting for, but newsome isn't one. and neither is Harris.

For fucks sake, newsome is a jackass. I remember a video posted during the California wildfire some lady walked up to him and was asking him what he's doing about it, and he said he was on the phone with the president fixing it, and she asked him to put trump on speaker and he admitted he wasnt talking to trump, the guy is pond scum

>>1415293
>I remember a video posted during the California wildfire some lady walked up to him and was asking him what he's doing about it, and he said he was on the phone with the president fixing it, and she asked him to put trump on speaker and he admitted he wasnt talking to trump
Found it, it's at about 1:15 https://youtu.be/tkvdDVnkeiw

>>1415146 (OP)
>I'm from Vietnam
Is you one of them real dark gooks? This nigga rate a lot of slope hos when he was saving his time in 'Nam. A lot of them " kid boat people" that came over here in the 80s was real dark. Darker than your average gook.

>>1415299
Rate 00ps raped

>>1415293
Let me guess. Your ideal candidate is a principled Democrat like Tulsi Gabbard.

>>1415301
Hm. No, I honestly don't think there are many mainstream candidates I would vote for. I don't like extreme candidates that are dogmatic to far left right ideals, I want common sense.

I want someone that doesn't support Israel, supports universal health care, universal education, strong immigration reform (stop illegals but make it easier for citizenship), protections on birth control and medically necessary abortions (voluntary abortions being a states right), balancing the budget with a combination of tariffa and taxes..

I really don't think I'm asking for radical positions here, I think mainstream politicians are pressured by their party into adopting and pushing radical rhetoric

>>1415299
>a war with Vietnam decades ago. the last semblance of US presence ceased to exist when one last Bell Huey helicopter took off from the roof of - after those landing skids no longer were in contact with such - what was the US embassy in Saigon in 1975
>nearly 50 years later, not only a US embassy in Saigon but a US consulate in Ho Chi Minh City: both with heads of such appointed by Trump. Through those diplomatic offices, veterans can enter Vietnam, and the locals welcome them with no ill will
>Vietnamese welcome investment in their country by a US company bigger than Elol's Tesla: NVidia. Investment by this major US company started way before November 2024
>heads of US embassy/consulate appointed by Trump to represent the country he is president of in Vietnam
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States%E2%80%93Vietnam_relations
'Over 2.1 million Vietnamese Americans are largely immigrants who moved to the United States after the Vietnam War. They comprise nearly half of all overseas Vietnamese'
'Vietnam is now considered to be a potential ally of the United States, especially in the geopolitical context of the territorial disputes in the South China Sea and in the containment of Chinese expansionism. Vietnam, one of the countries with the most favorable public opinion regarding the U.S., is the only communist country to have such a favorable view. Every U.S. president since diplomatic normalization in 1995 has visited Vietnam at least once, highlighting the importance of Vietnam in the U.S.'s growing pivot to Asia'
>Over 2.1 million Vietnamese Americans are largely immigrants who moved to the United States after the Vietnam War. They comprise nearly half of all overseas Vietnamese
>nothing done about these Vietnamese: even right up to today
>Vietnam is now considered to be a potential ally of the United States
Trump agrees, don't bother him about it.

>>1415308
Trump said getting STDs in the 80s was his personal vietnam.

>>1415293
I want to vote Democrat too, but I can't live in a country that won't stop forcing gender and race into everything and then won't even let me have a gun to defend myself while I get taxed on unrealized capital gains. Newsom, AOC, Kamala, Harris, etc, are just objectively worse options than Trump shit.

>>1415319
Personally, I think removing guns from society would be a net positive. Yeah their gender and race and identity pandering really irks me. Also, I don't think a wealth tax is needed, I think what is needed is a flat tax scheme like many countries with functional budgets have... Eg a flat 35% tax on all income regardless of its value.

>>1415328
>>1415319
Oh yeah. And dump fucking social security and replace it with a sovereign wealth fund for public pensions and retirement. Another hallmark of functional societies.

>>1415328
>Personally, I think removing guns from society would be a net positive.
I can't disagree more. I don't care how racist it sounds, but most of the first generation third world are just not compatible with civilized society and the police and government cannot be trusted to keep those individuals away from law abiding citizens. Crime would slowly sort itself out over time if normal people, especially women, just started killing the violent criminals and then we wouldn't need the police state at all. Trump is absolutely right about how we let people in and that was what gave him so much momentum. A Democrat could easily that same momentum with a common sense approach to immigration. Think Obama, but much more aggression towards the gangs and violent criminals

>>1415146 (OP)
she's an example of why no one wants to vote democrats anymore. she literally attacked a hero who protected people from a mentally ill stabber in the subway.
why am i not surprised the same type of people want terrorists to have nuclear weapons to attack us.

>>1415319
As a [insert demographically desirable minority group] who has voted blue all my life, I'm also stepping off the Democrat plantation until the party comes back to it's senses!
I've talked to several of my [insert demographically desirable minority group] Democrat friends and they agree! We'd love to continue backing the Democrat party, but if they continue to shove candidates like [insert current potential 2028 candidates] down our throats and doubling down on [insert right wing caricature of Democrat policy], we'll have no choice but to vote straight ticket Republican!
Now, if they were to run someone like [insert politician who recently switched to the Republican party], or [insert fringe candidate with no chance of ever winning the presidential election], then maybe I'd consider coming back!
Until then, I and the rest of [insert demographically desirable minority group] America are WALKING AWAY™ from the Democrat party!

>>1415333
You joke, but that kind of attitude is why Trump candidates will keep getting elected. Just completely dismissing and mocking legitimate concerns that people have will keep this cycle going

>>1415146 (OP)
average thirdie rage on display here

>>1415293
Honestly if they gave us a Democrat that supported universal healthcare, student debt relief, tax reform, and infrastructure spending, while also wanting to close the border and quit the grievance politics, they'd win in a Reagan-esque landslide

>>1415331
>Crime would slowly sort itself out over time if normal people, especially women, just started killing the violent criminals and then we wouldn't need the police state at all.
Idk man. Let the justice department take care of it with capitol punishment. Japan and Singapore executed drug dealers for years, Singapore still does and they are some of the safest countries in the world.

I'm 100% for being lenient on people in their first offences, especially non violent crime, locking people up for every drug possession offence until they sober up, and then executing people who commit multiple major drug trafficking offenses or violent crimes.

I would much rather law enforcement keep our streets safe and remove (permanently) net negative individuals from society than having to rely on my mom or brother to do it in the event they are victimized

>>1415339
>Honestly if they gave us a Democrat that supported universal healthcare, student debt relief, tax reform, and infrastructure spending, while also wanting to close the border and quit the grievance politics, they'd win in a Reagan-esque landslide
Literally this
The past 3 Democrats ran on a campaign of "I'm not trump" and that's just not an effective platform.
I want them to do this sooo much

>>1415332
It's been wild watching Republicans immediately revert back to being neocons after a decade of pretending to be anti-war.
Trump bombs Iran, something McCain got called a warmonger by members of his own party for even suggesting, and suddenly we're hearing the same bullshit we heard in 2002 about WMDs in the Middle East and how we have to fight them there or we'll have to fight them here.
The neocons never lost control of the Republican party, they just got better at lying.

>>1415345
you mean the american right wing just got dumber and more unhinged. evangalism: not even once

>>1415345
you mean the american right wing just got dumber and more unhinged. evangelism: not even once

>>1415342
I'm saying that they don't and the current Democrat and Republican candidates intentionally let repeat violent offenders back out to terrorize the general population. I want to decriminalize things like common drug use and roll penalties for violent crimes up to an 11.
>I would much rather law enforcement keep our streets safe and remove (permanently) net negative individuals from society than having to rely on my mom or brother to do it in the event they are victimized
I'm not advocating for regular people going out to clean up crime. I'm saying that taking away a force multiplier from a law abiding citizen is bad and so extremely unpopular with even most Democrat voters.

>>1415345
Did you forget that Obama continued the Bush wars for eight years or that Biden had tanks moving back into Syria on the day after he was inaugurated? This should wipe the Republican party out in the mid terms and next presidency, but don't kid yourself that they weren't going to keep these wars going

>>1415349
Did you forget about 'No More Foreign Wars' last year?
The MAGAtards' senile Hypocrite-in-Chief isn't the only one that has

>>1415347
You're right. The neocons didn't get better at lying, they just got more brazen about it.
And the Republican base stopped pretending to actually stand for anything but owning the libs, so they were more than happy to go along with the lie.

>>1415345
>>1415347
If there wasn't any basis for it sure, but iran purifying uranium to attempt to create a bomb is an objective fact.
TDS patients love to pretend this is the same as iraq WMD but they're just showing how idiotic and moronic they are.

>>1415348
>I'm saying that they don't and the current Democrat and Republican candidates intentionally let repeat violent offenders back out to terrorize the general population. I want to decriminalize things like common drug use and roll penalties for violent crimes up to an 11
I almost agree. Almost.
I want personal drug crimes to end without criminal charges, and instead end with some sort of short term incarceration removed from general population. Like a 7 day detox hold or something and it grows longer the more often you are caught.
Personal drug use of things like crack meth or fentanyl are easy to think it harms nobody but them, but in reality these people commit other crimes as part of their addiction.

The rest of what you said makes perfect sense to me, but we can disagree over the role of guns in society, I do 100% believe that people should be able to defend themselves, I just would much prefer we could he in a place where that defense was with idk baseball bats or pepper spray instead of guns

>>1415304
That was Harris

>>1415352
Trump's own Director of National Intelligence said otherwise while testifying before Congress two months ago, but go off.
Neocons been squealing that Iran is days away from a nuke for literal decades, why stop now?

>>1415356
IAEA says otherwise, and given how dumb the average democrat is you probably didn't even watch or listen properly.

>>1415361
Not him but are you saying Tulsi lied under oath?

>>1415361
This IAEA?
>UN nuclear chief says Iran has material to build bombs, but no plan to do so
https://www.foxnews.com/world/un-nuclear-chief-says-iran-has-material-build-bombs-no-plan-do-so

Trump is Israel's most loyal servant, he is even willing to sacrifice his fellow Americans for their sake, what a brave and noble altruistic gesture.

>>1415361
I appreciate you blatantly lying about the IAEA like that. If you hadn't, I may not have looked into it and seen that Trump had even less justification for bombing Iran that I originally thought.
So we have his own DNI saying under oath Iran wasn't working on a bomb, and the International Atomic Energy Agency director saying Iran wasn't working on a bomb.
We're literally back to a Republican president lying through his teeth to the American people, ignoring all intel that doesn't fit his narrative, and bombing a sovereign nation based on a gut feeling/ personal vendetta.
It's 2003 all over again.

>>1415362
there's no bigger scumbags in the world then lawyers and politicians I stand by that.
>>1415367
>>1415364
https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/iaea-director-generals-introductory-statement-to-the-board-of-governors-3-march-2025

"Following my last report, Iran’s stockpile of uranium enriched up to 60% U‑235 has increased to 275 kg, up from 182 kg in the past quarter. Iran is the only non-nuclear weapon State enriching to this level, causing me serious concern."

I didn't lie shit you retard, the IAEA has directly stated they are purifying uranium above 60%

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce3v6w2qr12o

"The global nuclear watchdog's board of governors has formally declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years.

Nineteen of the 35 countries on the board of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) voted for the motion, which was backed by the US, UK, France and Germany."

you're such a disgusting lying rat. why am i not surprised some TDS loser can't be bothered to even look at the news you fucking imbred.

>ignoring all intel that doesn't fit his narrative
oh the fucking irony of a far-left retard saying that.

you deserve to be fucking nuked for lying through your teeth like this you fucking piece of shit

>>1415375
The original claim
>>1415352
>iran purifying uranium *to attempt to create a bomb is an objective fact.*
Nothing you posted confirms that.
And in the link here
>>1415364
I'm sure you didn't read because it doesn't fit your narrative, the IAEA director explicit says there is no evidence of Iran attempting to create a bomb as of two days ago.
If you hadn't lied and said the IAEA confirmed they were working on a bomb, you might have a point.
But you just had to stretch the truth to the breaking point, and now you're pitching a hissy fit because you got called out for it.
Next time, try telling the truth.

>>1415146 (OP)
Clinton didn't any authorization from Congress to bomb Kosovo in 1999 with b2 bombers. No declaration of war, no authorization of the use of force. He just did it.

>>1415146 (OP)
Clinton didn't get any authorization from Congress to bomb Kosovo in 1999 with b2 bombers. No declaration of war, no authorization of the use of force. He just did it

>>1415377
>the IAEA director explicit says there is no evidence of Iran attempting to create a bomb as of two days ago
Yeah there is no evidence they were building nukes, the intelligence is that they were refining weapons grade uranium, which is something like 4-6x more pure than the civil uranium used for energy purposes.

>>1415380
The reports show enrichment up to 60 percent. Weapons grade uranium is in the 90 percent and above range.
However, it is true 60 percent is far above the level necessary for nuclear power purposes, and that is a valid concern.
The problem is, there is a massive gulf between evidence of highly enriched uranium and Iran being days away from getting a nuke, especially when the same organization confirming the 60 percent enrichment is also saying there's no evidence that Iran has developed or is in the process of developing a way to deliver a nuclear payload.
So when you have Trump using the justification that Iran is days away from a nuke to launch a bombing campaign on a sovereign nation, and you have his supporters claiming Iran creating a bomb is an objective fact, those claims are challenged by all publicly available data.

>>1415379
Oh, well if Clinton did it then I guess that it's ok...

>>1415282
probably a propa-bot

>>1415380
>those claims are challenged by all publicly available data
There's also the misconception that you need refined uranium to weaponize it.
A dirty bomb can just as easily destroy Israel, NYC, Seattle etc by dispersing radioactive material over a large area and rendering it completely uninhabitable.

>>1415377
iran purified uranium to above 60% purity when the 2015 treaties had everyone agree to 5%.
you didn't read the article or ur illiterate idk. but them purifying over 60% was confirmed and there's no reason to purify uranium outside of a nuclear bomb.
hence why they declared Iran in breach.

>>1415391
significantly weaker then an actual nuclear bomb, and the moment they use it against Israel they'll be met with retaliation from the rest of the western countries.
so if they only have 1 shot may as well go with something big no?

>>1415394
>they'll be met with retaliation
They're already the target of regime change. When the ayatollah gets killed, and the rest of the leadership is decapitated, the region will disintegrate into a civil war.
Retards think that nuclear bombs are the most definitive way to destroy a nation, but that hasn't been true for a long time. If Iran was truly interested in decimating Israel, then would've done so years ago.
Now they're backed into a corner and fissile material is missing.

>>1415354
lol

>>1415386
Well, it's a normal precedent in the US, that's just one of many examples

>>1415146 (OP)
Can't tell if it's an actually genuine post or it's an attempt at false-flagging.

Either way, that I can't tell it apart show how stupid Trump supporters are.

>>1415328
If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns. Especially combined with "defund the police" sentiment, it boils down to "make crime pay again".

In 2018, Trump said about gun ownership 'Take the guns first, go through due process second'. He went against the NRA to ban bump stocks.

>>1415436
>If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns.
Where are they getting new ones from? In Canada and Mexico, the answer is "from the US".

>>1415436
>If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns.
How about you take a look at every countries where access to guns are actually regulated, before parroting the same argument you have been fed?

>>1415436
>If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns
You end up with less guns and less outlaws though.

>Especially combined with "defund the police" sentiment, it boils down to "make crime pay again".
>meanwhile at the IRS

>>1415328
>I think what is needed is a flat tax scheme like many countries with functional budgets have...
List of those countries: 10 post soviet states, 5 former Warsaw pact countries, 3 partially (by Russia) recognized microstates, 2 South Pacific island micronations, Belize, and Bolivia.

Truly a mark of governmental and economic health. Who wouldn't want to live in a country with a flat tax?

>>1415471
Yeah I was more of thinking countries like Denmark which has a flat labor tax of 8% and federal tax of 15% and the only progressive or changing scales are municipal tax which range from 24-27%, for a final effective tax range of roughly 52-55%

>>1415474
Disregarding the DKK 51,600 deduction everyone in Denmark is entitled to which wildly skews taxation.

So, not a flat tax. At all.

>>1415475
A deductible has nothing to do with flat or progressive tax, they are unrelated.
You can have a deductible in both tax systems, but you are probably so poor you never pay any tax and this doesn't make sense to you

>>1415474
>>1415475
On that note, I think a lot of people wouldn't have much of a problem with a flat tax on income above a specific threshold or a flat tax with a cost of living deduction.

It's the universal flat tax that people rightly think is fucking stupid.

>>1415477
>A deductible has nothing to do with flat or progressive tax, they are unrelated.
No. I'm not engaging with this dumbassery. You're wrong, and you know it.

>>1415477
Okay, hear me out. What if we do a flat tax and then give everyone a deductible based on how much they're earning that scales negatively with income so that the more you make the greater a share of your income you pay the government?

>>1415328
>Personally, I think removing guns from society would be a net positive.
I agree, but that's a 100% pure fantasy scenario on par with everyone just agreeing to be nice to each other. It would be a net positive but it's functionally impossible, so a meaningless sentiment.

>>1415499
The only way it would work is if we tracked and audited the deductible part.
I think it would be best if everyone tracked every receipt they had, getting paper receipt for online/card purchases of course, and using that to track when they've hit their tier of taxes.
Then they take all those receipts to the local IRS station, which validates their deductible bracket, checks their receipts, and issues them a preliminary deductible charge card alongside the amount they'll need to request as a refund because their last paper receipt will almost always pay more taxes than they needed.

Then they can take their preliminary deductible charge card to a notary, who would revalidate their receipts again, check with the IRS that the deductible card rate is right, then finally motorize their preliminary deductible card request so they can go to the DMV and get their final tax deduction card.

Then whenever they make a payment they can slide that card first to not be charged taxes.

Its so easy I can't see us NOT adopting this system in 2 years.

>>1415146 (OP)
Based AOC, my president

>>1415499
Because if you use a progressive deductible it's now a progressive tax scheme you idiot, that's no longer flat

I know you tried to come up with some sort of clever gotcha, but you really aren't very good at it

>>1415515
>Because if you use a progressive deductible it's now a progressive tax scheme you idiot, that's no longer flat
Is now a bad time to point out that a set value deductible is progressive as a percent of income?

>I know you tried to come up with some sort of clever gotcha
Honestly it wasn't even that clever, but it worked.

>>1415516
Not that tranny, but the problem is that you essentially just recreated tax brackets

>>1415517
I'm describing the system they have in a country they had used as an example of a flat tax. It recreating tax brackets is the joke. They had no idea what they were talking about.

>>1415516
>Is now a bad time to point out that a set value deductible is progressive as a percent of income?
You are right. A deductible calculated using a percentage is a progressive tax scale.
I don't know what your trying to prove with your mental gymnastics here, but you are doing a really bad job of it

>>1415146 (OP)
AOC is a dumb cunt! A PODUS is the Commander in Chief. He's literally in charge of the entire US military. The only thing he needs permission for is to declare war, which he didn't do. He simply gave the green light for an operation that top military commanders have wanted do for the past 20 years. It could be woarse, Trump could've killed American soldiers and left US hostages behind while pulling out of Afghanistan... but we we're not talking about that are we?

>>1415474
Above 50 procent is absolutely criminal. Why do anything above the bare minimum at that point?

>>1415464
better yet take a look at the racial demographic of countries where gun related crimes actually happen and which races are causing these gun related crimes in the first place which is just false flagging for unwanted gun control

>>1415576
>he only thing he needs permission for is to declare war, which he didn't do.
You can't take war actions without declaring war first. Bombing a country is a war action. She is correct, he needed the authorisation of congress.

You are a moron.

>>1415654
That's pointless. race has never been proven to be a significant factor in committing violent crimes.

>>1415576
bruh trump made the fucking arrangements for the afghanistan pull outs, he is LITERALLY responsible for that, he did that before he fucking left office

He is literally responsible for the negative example you gave, dumb ass

>>1415391
Dirty business is more effective at destroying the Earth.

>>1415499
How about a sliding cost scale? A poor man's haircut $15, a rich man's haircut $27,000.