US strikes only set back Iran’s nuclear program by months, report says - /news/ (#1415800) [Archived: 425 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/25/2025, 4:50:31 PM No.1415800
1750862952511
1750862952511
md5: 5ad55b5abcd2170ced626af1bce801e6🔍
Very embarrassing.

WASHINGTON (AP) — A U.S. intelligence report suggests that Iran’s nuclear program has been set back only a few months after U.S. strikes and was not “completely and fully obliterated” as President Donald Trump has said, according to two people familiar with the early assessment.

The report issued by the Defense Intelligence Agency on Monday contradicts statements from Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran’s nuclear facilities. According to the people, the report found that while the Sunday strikes at the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites did significant damage, the facilities were not totally destroyed. The people were not authorized to address the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

The U.S. has held out hope of restarting negotiations with Iran to convince it to give up its nuclear program entirely, but some experts fear that the U.S. strikes — and the potential of Iran retaining some of its capabilities — could push Tehran toward developing a functioning weapon.

The assessment also suggests that at least some of Iran’s highly enriched uranium, necessary for creating a nuclear weapon, was moved out of multiple sites before the U.S. strikes and survived, and it found that Iran’s centrifuges, which are required to further enrich uranium to weapons-grade levels, are largely intact, according to the people.

At the deeply buried Fordo uranium enrichment plant, where U.S. B-2 stealth bombers dropped several 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs, the entrance collapsed and infrastructure was damaged, but the underground infrastructure was not destroyed, the assessment found. The people said that intelligence officials had warned of such an outcome in previous assessments ahead of the strike on Fordo.

https://apnews.com/article/iran-nuclear-program-military-strikes-trump-f0fc085a2605e7da3e2f47ff9ac0e01d
Replies: >>1415831 >>1415835 >>1416059
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 6:54:24 PM No.1415831
>>1415800 (OP)
lol suuuure ;)
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 6:59:10 PM No.1415835
>>1415800 (OP)
Trump doesn't know what the fuck he's doing
Replies: >>1416055
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 9:52:24 PM No.1415888
So, Iran having the ability to make a nuke was such a massive threat to the US that Trump had no choice but to bomb them. It doesn't matter that the IAEA and Tulsi Gabbard both said they weren't actively working on a nuke, the mere fact that they were capable of building one demanded immediate action, and we had no choice but to completely destroy their nuclear capabilities.
But now that Trump's own intel agencies are saying the nuclear sites weren't destroyed, the uranium had been moved out before the bombings, and they'll be back to where they were last week in a few months, Iran's nuclear capability isn't a concern?
How does that work?
Replies: >>1415889 >>1415894
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 10:02:31 PM No.1415889
>>1415888
>So, Iran having the ability to make a nuke was such a massive threat to the US that Trump had no choice but to bomb them
They didn't have the ability to make a nuke, they were enriching uranium to that level.
>the IAEA and said they weren't actively working on a nuke
Hard to say since the IAEA declared that Iran was non-compliant with regulations by having secret enrichment centers and undeclared nuclear material: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/12/un-nuclear-watchdog-says-iran-non-compliant-of-nuclear-safeguards
Replies: >>1415891
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 10:09:14 PM No.1415891
>>1415889
>They didn't have the ability to make a nuke, they were enriching uranium to that level.
They still have that uranium
>Hard to say since the IAEA declared that Iran was non-compliant with regulations by having secret enrichment centers and undeclared nuclear material
Didn't seem hard for the director of the same IAEA you cited to publicly say there's no evidence Iran was actively working on a nuclear weapon less than a week ago
https://www.foxnews.com/world/un-nuclear-chief-says-iran-has-material-build-bombs-no-plan-do-so
Replies: >>1415895
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 10:32:12 PM No.1415894
>>1415888
>How does that work?
In the same way that GW Bush thought that Iraq had WMDs. And look what happened to him.
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 10:34:10 PM No.1415895
>>1415891
You keep conflating two things. One is building a nuke, and the other is enriching uranium far outside of civil levels, having secret enrichment facilities, and hiding uranium.
The latter claim is a prerequisite condition for the former claim to be true, but is not sufficient to meet the former claim.

You might as well say there was no evidence they had an infinity gauntlet and were trying to eradicated half of all life, because it's not something anyone claimed was the basis for taking out their enrichment facilities.
Replies: >>1415898
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 10:37:42 PM No.1415898
>>1415895
>You might as well say there was no evidence they had an infinity gauntlet and were trying to eradicated half of all life, because it's not something anyone claimed was the basis for taking out their enrichment facilities.
Alright, let's get on the same page then.
What was the Trump administration's basis for bombing the enrichment facilities?
Replies: >>1415900
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 10:38:46 PM No.1415900
>>1415898
They were on the verge of being able to build a nuclear weapon
Replies: >>1415903 >>1415914
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 10:41:48 PM No.1415903
>>1415900
So Trump's own Intelligence Head lied under oath then? Because she claimed the opposite just one month prior.
Replies: >>1415905
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 10:42:32 PM No.1415905
>>1415903
>Because she claimed the opposite just one month prior
Source?
Replies: >>1415907
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 10:43:47 PM No.1415907
>>1415905
>https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/americas-spies-say-iran-wasnt-building-a-nuclear-weapon-trump-dismisses-that-assessment
>In her March testimony to lawmakers, Gabbard said the intelligence community “continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003.”
Replies: >>1415910
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 10:46:33 PM No.1415910
>>1415907
Yes, they were not actively building a nuke.
How about you post the part of her quote where she said they were stockpiling the material though
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c056zqn6vvyo
>The US Director of National Intelligence said her March testimony - in which she said Iran had a stock of materials but was not building these weapons

You really don't get this do you?
Nobody has ever claimed they had evidence of an active program to build a nuclear warhead.

That's never changed.

The claim this whole time has been that they have been stockpiling and enriching the uranium to near weapons level and hiding the enrichment facilities from the IAEA, your knee is just too busy jerking straight into your forehead for you to understand this
Replies: >>1415915 >>1415922
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 10:49:51 PM No.1415914
>>1415900
They still have the uranium and Trump's Intel agencies are saying the enrichment sites are still mostly intact.
If that's the case, why is Trump suddenly acting like the threat has been completely neutralized?
Either Iran being on the path to a nuclear weapon is a threat needing military intervention or it's not. If it is, why did we stop at one bombing? If it's not, why did we bomb in the first place?
Replies: >>1416056
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 10:57:25 PM No.1415915
>>1415910
>Nobody has ever claimed they had evidence of an active program to build a nuclear warhead.
And here's Trump saying Gabbard was wrong and they were about to make a nuke.
>https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-tulsi-gabbard-wrong-iran-nuclear-program/
>When the president arrived in Bedminster, New Jersey, on Friday, a reporter asked him: "What intelligence do you have that Iran is building a nuclear weapon? Your intelligence community had said they have no evidence that they are at this point."
>"Well then, my intelligence community is wrong," Mr. Trump responded. "Who in the intelligence community said that?"
>"Your director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard," the reporter answered.
>"She's wrong," Mr. Trump said, moving on to the next question.
Anonymous
6/25/2025, 11:15:27 PM No.1415922
>>1415910
>Nobody has ever claimed they had evidence of an active program to build a nuclear warhead.
Trump did.
Anonymous
6/26/2025, 4:10:50 AM No.1416055
>>1415835
That and or he sucks jew cock without demand. Doesn't even need to have a gun pointed towards his head at this point.
Anonymous
6/26/2025, 4:23:54 AM No.1416056
>>1415914
>If that's the case, why is Trump suddenly acting like the threat has been completely neutralized?
Haven't you noticed from the media how hard he's been forcing the 12 Day War meme? This entire ordeal was theater so he can look like the peacemaker president and have his own cool war name in the history books
Replies: >>1416058
Anonymous
6/26/2025, 4:28:43 AM No.1416058
>>1416056
Wonder what they'll call it when this ceasefire inevitably goes to shit.
Anonymous
6/26/2025, 4:29:57 AM No.1416059
>>1415800 (OP)
Who do I trust? The media who constantly lie, the intelligence agencies who constantly lie, or the President who constantly lies?
Replies: >>1416100
Anonymous
6/26/2025, 7:34:21 AM No.1416100
>>1416059
The people who told you the media constantly lie were lying.