Trump to begin enforcing birthright citizenship order as early as this month, DOJ says

> Thread Theme: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbFKr_kXnzA

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-begin-enforcing-birthright-citizenship-order-early-month-doj-says

> Trump administration lawyers told a federal judge Tuesday that they could begin enforcing President Donald Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship before the end of July — moving quickly to enforce the controversial order just days after a landmark Supreme Court ruling.

> Lawyers for the administration told U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman that they would not enforce Trump's executive order before July 27, in recognition of a 30-day stay ordered by the Supreme Court in its ruling last week.

> "The Court’s stay thus allows Defendants to immediately begin to 'develop and issu[e] public guidance about the executive’s plans to implement the executive order," Justice Department attorney Brad Rosenberg said Tuesday in a court filing.

> The update comes after Trump officials testified Monday at an emergency hearing in Maryland, where Boardman grilled government lawyers for details on how they plan to enforce the president's order.

> Trump's order, signed on the first day of his second White House term, directs all U.S. government agencies to refuse to issue citizenship documents to children born to illegal immigrants, or who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen of lawful permanent resident.

> It was almost immediately blocked by lower courts, before eventually making its way to the Supreme Court, which reviewed the case in May.

> The high court's 6-3 ruling Friday narrowly focused on the authority of lower courts' ability to issue nationwide injunctions and did not wade into the legality of Trump's executive order, which served as the legal pretext for the case.

It's hard to believe he has eroded the constitution this much in such a short amount of time.

>>1417597 (OP)
> In the ruling, the justices said plaintiffs seeking nationwide relief must file their cases as a class action lawsuit — prompting a flurry of action from the ACLU, CASA and other immigrant advocacy groups who amended their filings over the weekend.

> In Monday's emergency hearing, Boardman demanded specifics from the administration.

> "Just to get to the heart of it," she said. "I want to know if the government thinks that it can start removing children from the United States who are subject to the terms of the executive order."

> Rosenberg responded in the filing that July 27 "is the earliest date on which defendants may begin to apply" under the Supreme Court's stay.

> Lawyers for the Trump administration also stressed that the Supreme Court's ruling last week, which centered on universal injunctions, does not preclude it from taking other actions before that date, and said it plans to "immediately" begin developing and issuing public guidance on the order.

> The high court's ruling touched off a flurry of new lawsuits from the ACLU and other immigration advocacy groups, who re-filed class action lawsuits in federal courts in Maryland and New Hampshire.

> The order, signed by Trump on his first day in office, was immediately challenged in January by more than 22 U.S. states and immigrants' rights groups, which argued the effort to end birthright citizenship was both unconstitutional and "unprecedented," threatening more than 100 years of legal precedent.

> It also sparked deep and unyielding concerns from critics, who noted that roughly 150,000 children in the U.S. are born annually to parents of noncitizens.

God fucking damn this timer.
>>1417600
> Advocates have warned possible fallout from the order could prove "catastrophic."

> "I think one thing we have documented in the record is the incredible stress, anxiety and fear that our plaintiffs are experiencing because they're not lawyers," CASA attorney William Powell said Monday.

> "It is confusing to them, and we can't really assure them the order is fully blocked, because it's not."

>>1417601
yeah they don't make it easy to post stories here

>>1417600
> The high court's ruling touched off a flurry of new lawsuits from the ACLU and other immigration advocacy groups, who re-filed class action lawsuits in federal courts in Maryland and New Hampshire.
I hope so! it's good to know some people aren't going to take this lying down. It's got to be one of the most unamerican things he's done so far.

>>1417597 (OP)
Please read the sticky, newfriend
>When starting a thread you must include the complete URL of a news article from a credible news site
Fox News is neither credible nor news. Its an entertainment/propaganda channel designed to trick boomers and other low IQ morons..

>>1417604
Oh go blow yourself, Fox News is practically the mouthpiece of this administration.

>>1417604
Sorry anon, it was this or Yahoo News.

>>1417608
Ignore him he always whines about Fox News as a source.

>>1417607
>Fox News is practically the mouthpiece of this administration
>>1417485
That aged well

>>1417618
and what's your point?

foxnews.com
Entertainment organization (not actual news) threads are cancer and against >>>/news/rules/1
OP is a faggot.
Fulfill your civic duty to help purge this board of anarchistic, sociopathic, intellectually regressive youtube/reddit/twitter immigrant subhumans like him who are under the delusion that all of 4chan (instead of just the designated shitposting playpens like /b/, /trash/, /bant/, etc.) is a toilet by reporting this thread en masse.
Here's a link so you don't have to scroll up to the top of the page.
https://sys.4chan.org/news/imgboard.php?mode=report&no=1417597

>>1417620
It's rude to point

>>1417604
No news site is credible. And it's spelled newfag, faggot.

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/358983-media-shows-why-its-so-mistrusted-after-falsified-trump-fish-feeding/

>>1417662
Aren't you still crying because the immigrant fucking your mom still isn't being deported?

>>1417662
>No news site is credible according to this news site.

>>1417663
lol. That's all you've got? Try harder.

>>1417664
>pretending not to notice CNN deliberately edited video to spread a bald faced lie

That isn't the own you think it is, sweetheart.

>>1417665
oh, did cnn pay 787 million dollars in order to perpetuate a lie, shill faggot?

>>1417665
>CNN deliberately edited video to spread a bald faced lie
Source?
Because thats not what this lawsuit or CNN is saying.

>>1417676
Fucking LMFAO. No, seriously where is that faggot that calls everyone esl shill? This dumb motherfucker seriously wants us to believe he's so damn stupid he can't follow a conversation across THREE POSTS!

The source is right here >>1417662 you dense motherfucker.

>>1417684
>>1417666

>>1417684
I know this is a hard point to understand as an esl shill, but opinion articles aren't sources
You should just link wikipedia, faggot

>>1417684
>shill furious that CNN is lying
>implies that its just as bad as Rupert Murdoch openly stating that he lied to con gullible morons and paying hundreds of millions of dollars in a settlement because they were deliberately and repeatedly lying
>look at the link she posted
https://x.com/VeronicaRochaLA/status/927400669996130305
It says Trump fed fish with Abe and then dumped food into the pond.
It shows Trump feeding fish with Abe then dumping food into the pond.

You're spare parts. Get mental help

>>1417687
So that's your plan? Cover your ears and go "lalalaicanthearyou"? lol.

>>1417688
And I see you're going with straight up lies while hoping that no one will read the article and learn CNN deliberately edited footage so that their audience saw Trump dump his koi food first so people would think Trump was being rude.

What next? Going to ask "$0uR©3?!" again?

>>1417690
>A cut off clip that makes Trump look slightly rude is basically the same as fabricating multiple entire stories to the point you got sued for almost 800 million and had to admit under law you are not a news network

>>1417699
You mean that time a corporation acting on behalf of the federal government sued a news outlet for hundreds of millions of dollars for questioning the most safest and secure election in US history?

Democrats aren't even consistent bootlickers.

>>1417700
No, they got sued because they made bullshit claims they had 0 backing for in court. Had Fox had even one verifiable claim they would've been fine. They didn't, so it was just libel.

>>1417700
Ok tRUMP licker

>>1417700
Tucker's text messages throw your point in the trash.

>>1417702
No retard, it was because a state actor was suing them and the justice system was openly prejudiced against anybody who questioned the election.

SCOTUS literally argued that individual citizens didn't have the right to sue over election discrepancies unless literally every single person equally disaffected by the fraud was in on the lawsuit, even the people who won the election.

Why do chuds always try to play the persecuted card when they know they're wrong?

>>1417705
Yeah it was so prejudiced that none of their evidence held up even 5 years later. So prejudiced even their fucking documentary fell apart under scrutiny.

>>1417708
>under scrutiny
Nobody had standing to sue retard. The courts dismissed all cases on procedural grounds without hearing the evidence presented. Third party ballot tabulators and legacy news agencies argued that no evidence existed because no evidence was allowed to be entertained, despite being widely documented.

The FBI came out and stated that China interfered in our elections using fake drivers licenses, but it's five years too fucking late.

>>1417711
>despite being widely documented.
Oh, you mean like the ballot box thing... that didn't hold up to scrutiny. Or the fake voters... that didn't hold up to scrutiny. Or the Cyber Ninjas, which, you know, fucking imploded and destroyed that company after they spent millions to find jack shit.

>>1417714
>Or the Cyber Ninjas
Which were sued into bankruptcy because they discovered that the distributor of ballot machines lied about how secure they were and some fuckhead at the Maricopa County office was caught deleting election data after they were subpoenaed by the court.

>>1417719
Not him but I'd really like to know where you people get this shit from?
>(inb4 a random Arizona state senator shitposting)

>>1417699
You might not want to keep hammering lawsuits so hard...https://www-bbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3w4n8778q2o.amp?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17515187352496&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.com%2Fnews%2Farticles%2Fc3w4n8778q2o

Seeing as how CBS just settled with Trump.

You might also want to stop downplaying a national news organization deliberately altering footage to spread a lie. Or assuming I trust FOX news any more than I trust any news network.

Or you could keep embarrassing yourself.

>>1417722
No, you're still losing
>The company noted the settlement does not include a statement of apology or regret.
They need Trumps blessing to complete their merger and to make him stop delaying things.
Its just an extortion payment.

>>1417721
It was from the audit.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAAu6O33rNE
tl;dr the state was ordered to preserve election data by the courts. What the audit found is that someone ran a script and deleted a thousand directories using an administrative account shared by election staff.
The only reason they found out the identity of this person is because the terminal they accessed was being observed by a CCTV camera.
The machines were also supposed to be airgapped by they weren't.

>>1417722
He was literally going to block their merger if they didn't pay him. Trump is just using his power to extort people.

>>1417726
>What the audit found is that someone ran a script and deleted a thousand directories using an administrative account shared by election staff.
No they didn't you fuckin retard. What ACTUALLY happened was they claimed this, not realizing the data was just archived and not deleted. And yes, the machines WERE airgapped; they literally outright lied/were incorrect about that and the county had to point out the server they found in an office and were using as proof wasn't actually connected to their EMS system.

This is literally why they got sued; they either lied about this or were so incompetent they didn't bother to double check what they were saying. You're regurgitating the same disproven bullshit that bankrupted the whole company.

>>1417719
>Which were sued into bankruptcy
What is this revisionism? Cyber Ninjas didn't even get sued; they got fined into bankruptcy because they outright refused to hand over documents they were LEGALLY REQUIRED to give via public records request. They refused to do so for months until the judge had no choice but to start fining them 50k a day until they did so, at which point they promptly went bust. They literally could've stopped it at any time by releasing the documents, which you'd think they'd have no problem with if they actually found anything.

>>1417726
>>1417747
>>1417743
>Hey, chatgpt, did cyber ninjas find deleted data, or was it never deleted at all? Who lied?
There is no evidence anyone lied, but it's complicated.

What Actually Happened Technically

The Cyber Ninjas/CyFIR team originally reported that certain directories or database files appeared to be missing or deleted from the election management system server.

Ben Cotton (CyFIR) testified that through standard forensic tools, he was able to recover those files, implying that:

The files had been deleted at the file system level (or were at least not visible through ordinary means).

The data was not irretrievably wiped or securely erased — it was recoverable using forensic recovery methods (which can often retrieve deleted-but-not-overwritten data).


This aligns with how file systems work: deleting a file typically marks the space as available but does not immediately destroy the data. Forensic tools can often reconstruct it unless the space has been overwritten.


---

What the Media and Officials Emphasized

Media reports and county statements generally framed it as:

There was no deletion in the sense of malfeasance — meaning no deliberate, improper wiping to obstruct the audit.

The data was always “present” in the sense that it wasn’t destroyed beyond recovery.


But they blurred the distinction between:

Nothing was deleted at all (which isn’t what Cotton stated)

Deleted data was recovered, so no harm was done (which is closer to reality)

Yes — the data appeared deleted at the file system level, but was recovered. No — this recovery does not prove it was “never deleted” at all. No — there’s no clear evidence of intentional deletion for malicious purposes. Yes — media and officials often framed the recovery as disproving any deletion, rather than clarifying the subtleties of file system forensics.

>>1417748
>lying about what Chatgpt says
Who is this supposed to work on?

>>1417750
It's not my fault you are a retard who doesn't understand technology
https://files.catbox.moe/u7rqgv.png

>>1417751
why do you love being made fun of so much, dumb faggot

>>1417748
>>1417751
>Guys my algorithm that regurgitates a summary of all the bullshit on the internet, including my bullshit, said something
please, for the love of god, have an original thought.

>>1417753
>>1417752
Absolutely seething.
Why do you hate facts tho? Why do you kneejerk so badly when you are wrong? Why not just accept reality?

>>1417753
I wish chatgpt was my algorithm, I wouldn't be posting on this board trying to show retards like you how you are wrong

>>1417754
If you're citing fucking chatgpt, you've already lost.

>>1417755
I can show you the screenshot cotton released in his final report and also show you the documentation for r studio that indicates what is being examined is deleted data.

Would that make you less retarded?

>>1417756
And I can show you the county confirming the data was never deleted, it was archived and cyber ninjas was so retarded they couldn't find it and just said it was deleted.

In fact, I will:
>https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/68971/Final-Technical-Response-Letter-with-Exhibits-5172021

>>1417757
>it was archived
That's not actually what it says in relation to the deleted data. I encourage you to actually read what you just posted, because I did and that's not how it refutes this claim of deleted data

>>1417751
>>1417754
>>1417756
fucking retards
https://files.catbox.moe/dc3231.png
>Why was cyberninjas disgraced as a fact checker of voter information?
ChatGPT said:

>CyberNinjas’ reputation as a “fact checker” of voter information was discredited due to major methodological flaws, partisan bias, and false claims:

>Cyberninja's discovered real fraud!
>I own a real gun! Its not airsoft!
>I'm really an american like you!

>>1417759
It literally points out their archival procedures and how Cyber Ninja's inability to properly extract from them was why they couldn't find it.

>>1417767
>"cybeer neenjas"
>inability to properly extract
meaning they conscientiously decided they "had zero knowledge of forensic recovery"
>>1417753
nta, trying to inject common sense
>>1417748
>to delete or not delete
DATA was moved - suspicious or not - it was fucking MOVED - a person deliberately transferred it - someone made a supervisory decision. There is no "blur"
>>1417747
>revisionism?
>didn't get sued
>fined to oblivion
choose one, but only one desu - it's the same thing - slow your roll.

>>1417773
Read the report retard. Also read how literally all they needed to do to not get fined was do the public information request they were legally required to do as per their job, and then they didn't. That's why they promptly got fined until they declared bankruptcy.

>>1417767
>It literally points out their archival procedures
It makes a fanciful argument about a raid configuration hiding some data but not others

>>1417760
>"Why was cyber ninjas discredited"
That's called a leading question and you should feel ashamed. You led it to the conclusion you desired. Good job.

>>1417760
Case in point about leading questions, you retard:
"Why was cyber ninjas praised for such a good job?"
https://files.catbox.moe/qwe5x8.png

>>1417600
>a flurry
>it's just a few people walking into a clerk's office
>dropped right there
can they even sensationalize anymore, or do their employees all have a hate boner working for them as much as I'm tired of watching/reading their sloppa?

>>1417778
>>1417779
[damage control intensifies]

>>1417774
>read my sloppa
>legally, you don't even
how's the failboat ride sofar?

>>1417779
>4. Faulty Methodology and Ignorance
>Independent experts and local officials condemned their work as “laughable” and “intentionally misleading.” A Maricopa report found 76 out of 77 claims were false, misleading, or inaccurate
>Major criticisms included mishandling data, misunderstanding election processes and law, and poor statistical methods

>>1417783
>I HATE THE FACTS OF THE CASE! THEY KEEP SAYING I'M WRONG!
We know.

>>1417784
For SHAME! I'm OUTRAGED!
>nicely done

>>1417785
*yawn* tl;dr, you just came to derail the thread and bark, puke, and spit.

>>1417785
Your "alternative facts" aren't real.

>>1417722
>>1417742
Cope harder fuckers. Once again a mainstream news outlet deceptively edits footage instead of reporting the naked facts. They don't have to admit to it; it's enough that everyone can see they unabashedly lied to their audience.

>>1417796
>it was real in my mind

>>1417796
Good post

>>1417798
Remember, to the retarded shill correctly describing what the president is doing and including a president doing exactly what they're describing is deceptive editing and lies.
Trump probably hates that footage specifically and he's paying people to froth over it, nothing else really makes sense.

>>1417832
Did you know the White House just doesn't save transcripts of Trump's addresses and speeches anymore? I thought that was interesting.

>>1417837
You cant AI transcript Trump. Comes out as complete garbage.
Manually transcribing Trump also comes out as unintelligible gibberish, but its at least more accurate.

>>1417837
They know anyone looking back at them will see his mind fucking melting. Any transcript of trump is borderline incomprehensible, nevermind anything that happens BEHIND the scenes.

>>1417796
>>1417830
Get a room you two

>>1417837
Why bother when the video is archived?

>>1417885
They are only allowed to cover what Trump wants them to cover.
https://www.npr.org/2025/02/26/nx-s1-5308628/trump-white-house-press-access-voa
>In the White House briefing room Tuesday, the Trump administration announced its latest steps to tighten its grip on the message it sends out and the news coverage it receives.

>No longer would the White House Correspondents' Association, made up of news outlets that cover the White House, determine how they will share coverage of President Trump at major events where space is limited.