https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/fbi-reward-shooter-ice-raid-california-b2787137.html

FBI offering $50,000 reward for info on protester who appeared to ‘fire a gun’ at ICE agents

Armed demonstrator sought after immigration raid on California ‘marijuana facility’ sparks angry clashes

The FBI has offered a $50,000 reward for information leading to the conviction of a person who appeared to fire a gun at federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers in southern California on Thursday.

The alleged shooting took place on Laguna Road in Camarillo, Ventura County, where agents were executing a warrant at what the Department of Homeland Security described as a “marijuana facility” and met with resistance from local activists and workers blocking their path, leading to several arrests.

U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, who heads the Central District of California office, announced the FBI reward on social media and shared a picture and video of the suspect, who is seen wearing a black T-shirt, pants, and a white surgical mask.

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) also posted about the incident on X, warning: “Make no mistake: anyone who targets our agents will face the full force of federal prosecution.”

According to CBS News, agents en route to the farm in Camarillo encountered the protesters blocking their way, ordered them to back up and fired tear gas and non-lethal rounds when they stood their ground, beginning what proved to be a four-hour-long standoff that also saw the demonstrators smash vehicles’ windows with pebbles and stones.

The Ventura County Fire Department reported that paramedics transported four people to the hospital and treated three more at the scene.

Federal agents brought at least one person they arrested to nearby St. John’s Hospital, according to the Oxnard Police Department, and left men outside the facility to assist with crowd control, anticipating further protests.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom posted a clip of the clashes on X with the comment: “Kids running from tear gas, crying on the phone because their mother was just taken from the fields. Trump calls me ‘Newscum’ – but he’s the real scum.”

CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott fired back on the same platform: “Here’s some breaking news: 10 juveniles were found at this marijuana facility – all illegal aliens, eight of them unaccompanied. It’s now under investigation for child labor violations. This is Newsom’s California.”

The state has increasingly found itself on the frontline of the Trump administration’s crackdown on illegal immigration, with anti-ICE protests erupting in downtown Los Angeles last month.

The president responded by deploying the National Guard and active-duty Marines to maintain peace, despite the opposition of Gov. Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass, who expressed concern that the show of force would only exacerbate the situation.

The tensions have since been exacerbated by incidents such as the tackling of Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla as he attempted to ask a question at a press conference held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and controversial comments from the Vice Mayor of Cudahy, urging local “cholos” to rise up and protect the community.

Four men were arrested earlier this week for allegedly using homemade spike traps to attempt to impede the progress of another raid in Van Nuys by puncturing the tires on agents’ vehicles.

The situation has reportedly left the state’s Latino community living in fear and even going into hiding, regardless of their immigration status, with one man telling the press: “It’s like Anne Frank.”

President Trump is reportedly preparing to relax the rules to exempt farm laborers from his mass deportation push after realising that doing otherwise threatens to blow a huge hole in an important industry, a decision that would bring significant relief to California where farmers and ranchers are major employers and where seasonal migrant workers are all-important come harvest time.

>>1419335 (OP)
How was he supposed to know they were ICE when they never identify themselves?

>>1419338
>Your honor, I thought it was ok to shoot people because they wore face coverings
Libtards really believe this. If it were true mobs of antifa would be getting mowed down by conservatives whenever they begin to congregate

>>1419339
A group of unidentified armed men starts throwing smoke grenades into a local business without anything to identify them as law enforcement. Please explain how this doesn't warrant the use of the 2nd amendment to defend you and your family.

>>1419338
Any proof they didn't identify themselves as ICE agents? It says they were executing a warrant. How would ICE execute a warrant for ICE without telling the people that they are ICE?

>>1419342
Don't bully him. He thinks that when ice conducts a raid they pull up in a 1940's Opel Admiral and goose march from the vehicle to the building while singing horst wessel leid

>>1419341
Ostensibly if antifa pulled up in what appeared to be marked federal vehicles and announced themselves as federal agents and began arresting someone they accused of being a criminal you may very well be arrested for murder if you shot one of them and you would have to later convince the jury that you had reason to believe these people you shot were actually bad guys

It really all depends on the jurisdiction and the DA.

California has very strict laws about when you can use lethal force, and I don't think claiming that you believe someone was wearing a costume to arrest someone is valid grounds in California for trying to murder them, someone's life needs to be in imminent danger

>>1419338
>a line of cops in uniform
>wearing riot gear
>with police placards on their vests
>facing off with a mob of """protesters"""
>throwing tear gas to disperse the crowd
>driving humvees
>with aircraft above recording everything
Yeah you're right. There was no way to know if these people were working for the government. Holy shit.

>>1419341
>A group of unidentified armed men starts throwing smoke grenades into a local business without anything to identify them as law enforcement.
This is going to be a long, painful, day of cope from the left over this. It is amazing the circus of hoops you cunts will jump through to justify someone shooting a handgun into a line of police. As if we don't have the video to see what really happened and have to rely on your headcanon.

>we will shoot you at work in front of your coworkers if you hide your face and we will shoot you at home in front of your family if you show your face
leftists.

>>1419335 (OP)
Huh sweet. It's happening already. Didn't take long.

Now to bring out the popcorn and see how much worst it gets.

>>1419341
>A group of unidentified armed men starts throwing smoke grenades into a local business
Replace "smoke grenades" with "molotovs" and you'll have successfully described 2020.

>>1419339
Didn't conservatives praise Rittenhouse when he killed masked men who they allege were part of antifa?

>>1419360
NTA, are you really sure you want to open up this Rittenhouse argument? You're not going to win.

>>1419364
are you sure you want to glorify a figure who's already been discarded by the entire right wing aside from poltards? you're not going to look sane

>>1419360
Yes, they verbally threatened to kill him multiple times without provocation, pointed their firearms at him, assaulted him with a skateboard, and attempted to disarm him

Can't believe you people are still bringing this up when the jury unanimously decided it was self defense

>>1419364
I guess I just thought right wingers meant it when they posted here for years that gun rights are human rights and you should be able to shoot anyone who threatens you or your property

>guys, shooting a federal officer for carrying out their lawful duties by arresting someone for breaking the law is totally the same as shooting a rioter in self defense who is trying to murder you

Leftards, everyone.

>>1419367
>gun rights are human rights
Nta, but nobody here is trying to "take guns" the discussion is about "can you murder a federal officer for doing their lawful duties" and no, that's not a right anyone has

>>1419368
>>1419368
Personally I don't think shooting anyone is ever justified I'm just having a hard time understanding the mental gymnastics. I mean just a couple of weeks ago people were telling me that Ruby Ridge and Waco were the evil feds oppressing the poor gun owners who were just defending their property and rights and I fail to see how this is particularly different

>>1419368
>>1419369
so they can breathe?

>>1419365
>>1419367
... Alright. Time for the left to take another fat, juicy L over the Rittenhouse trial.

First off your question is retarded because nobody Rittenhouse shot was wearing a mask - unless you want to count that pedo Rosenbaum wearing his tshirt over his face like a retard. But even then Rittenhouse didn't shoot him because he was wearing a "mask". Rittenhouse shot him because he was being chased by Rosenbaum while Ziminski, another felon, was shooting at Kyle with his (illegal) pistol. When Kyle heard the shot and turned around, Rosenbaum was lunging at him and Kyle had no choice but to shoot.

We've been over this a million times. I can't wait to hear more "Kyle should've done X, Y, or Z" in the most obvious case of self-defense in recorded history.

Neither Huber or Grosskreutz wore masks, nor were they shot for wearing masks. They were both shot for attacking Rittenhouse with weapons - a blunt object and a handgun.
>in before I need to pull up articles of people being attacked and killed with skateboards again
>in before the mob wasn't trying to kill him, as they're shouting "get his ass", "fuck him up", "cranium that boy", etc. as Kyle is trying to run to a line of police for safety
>in before the ultra-retarded argument that the mob was trying to save the police from an active shooter - who isn't actively shooting
>in before I have to post Grosskreutz's GoPro video that shows Kyle telling him he's running to the police

>I guess I just thought right wingers meant it when they posted here for years that gun rights are human rights and you should be able to shoot anyone who threatens you
Which is exactly what happened with Rittenhouse, so what's your point?

>>1419370
No idea about the strawman you constructed but I'm arguing facts not opinions, and it's a fact that people do not have the right to murder a federal agent carrying out their lawful duties regardless of how they are dressed.
They could be dressed in Hitler costumes and it would still be illegal.

>>1419372
nobody cares faggot. nobody likes kyle rittenhouse except extremists

>>1419374
don't you have a floor to shit on, or a police officer to mace

>>1419377
I'm not the one who brought him up, dumbass.

>>1419372
>>1419374
>If you hadn't come here this wouldn't have happened!
So it's not a human right to possess a gun and defend yourself or your property, it's just okay to do if you're a kid going out looking for violence

>>1419381
>>If you hadn't come here this wouldn't have happened!
Rittenhouse had more of a right to be there than any of the rioters.

>So it's not a human right to possess a gun and defend yourself or your property,
You reached this conclusion how?

>>1419380
you're the one who can't wait to suck his dick though

>>1419381
>it's just okay to do if you're a kid going out looking for violence
Which Kyle wasn't doing.

>>1419383
you have more of a right to be made fun of than any of the /news/ posters

>>1419385
LOL

>>1419387
lmao no counterargument.

>>1419389
your laughable opinion is not an argument. rittenhouse is a disgraced has-been and when he shows up for appearances the real talent immediately cancels

>>1419390
>kyle was out looking for violence
>which is why kyle ran from violence and only shot in immediate self-defense as a last-resort

>>1419392
>kyle traveled to another state after a curfew but he was actually running away from violence

>>1419393
>>kyle traveled to another state after a curfew
>local /news/ retard demonstrates he knows nothing about the Rittenhouse case
Fun fact: Kyle was actually there before the riots started. I bet you didn't know that.

>>1419394
so you do know the difference between a riot and a protest? that's new

>>1419393
>kyle traveled to another state after a curfew
This is a lie.
Why must you people lie so often?

>>1419401
why was it okay for him to be there after curfew if he was underage, shill anon? why did the police essentially deputize him? why did he say he was going to murder shoplifters recently?

>>1419403
actually it wasn't even recently, he said he was going to murder people right before he murdered people in kenosha. why are you so obsessed with defending this disgrace

>>1419360
I love when leftists bring up Rittenhouse, it's just you admitting to being an NPC who mindlessly repeats what you're told.
Rittenhouse was just trying to put out a fire when arsonists attacked him. He tried to run away but they wouldn't let him. So he defended himself. It's a very simple case to understand.

>>1419367
can you show me which right wingers said that endless waves of illegal foreign invaders should be allowed to conquer our country and murder our government workers?

>>1419370
so you unironically believe that people should just allow themselves to be murdered instead of defending themselves?

>>1419381
>it's a human right to illegally invade and conquer a foreign country and kill their government employees.
Okay Vladimir

>>1419403
>people should be executed for staying after curfew
so if Kyle actually did just start mass-murdering people (as opposed to his valid self-defense) you would have been okay with it because those people were out after curfew?
Also the terrorists weren't trying to kill Kyle because of curfew they were trying to kill him because he had a fire extinguisher. Rosenbaum was starting confrontations during the daytime too.

>>1419405
he didn't murder anybody. It was clear self-defense. And a few hours before that Rosenbaum said that he was going to kill people who put out his fires.

>>1419403
>why was it okay for him to be there after curfew
Again, he had more of a right to be there than the rioters. Notice how the curfew charge was tossed before trial?
>why did the police essentially deputize him?
Dafuk? When did this happen?
> why did he say he was going to murder shoplifters recently?
Saying I want to shoot shoplifters months ago is not the same thing as saying I'm going here to shoot people, retard. I want to shoot democrats every time they riot. Does that mean I'm not allowed to protect myself when one of you animals attacks me in the streets?

>>1419413
>he had more of a right to be there than the rioters
Why are you arguing with an anon that defends illegal immigrants but gets mad at US citizens breaking curfew?

>>1419415
Because it's easy. I could debate the Rittenhouse case in my sleep.

>>1419416
Don't bully the retarded, please. They don't understand.

>>1419413
Saying you want to shoot shoplifters goes to mental state. If you say you want to shoot people and then go somewhere where an opportunity has potential to arise for you do do so, then you aren't in a defensive mindset. Not that it really matters since you're basically saying it's okay when tittenhouse does it but when armed, masked men show up to a farm you're ready to lick boot and be outraged at people actually defending themselves

>>1419403
>why was it okay for him to be there after curfew if he was underage, shill anon?
Hi shill anon. No, neither was it ok for the mob that tried to murder him to be there after curfew.
>why did the police essentially deputize him?
You essentially completely made this up.
>why did he say he was going to murder shoplifters recently
You'd have to ask him, but regardless your argument is a non sequitur. It doesn't matter if he said that the was had fallen and billions must die, he *still* has the right to defend himself when attacked by murderous mob trying to kill him for extinguishing a dumpster fire they set

Let me reframe this for you.
You just argued that Kyle was not acting in self defense and the mob's attack on him was justified due to 1) he was out past curfew, 2) police "deputized" him and 3) he said something weeks earlier that nobody there had knowledge of.

This is why you people always loose. Your argument is utter shit when taken at face value.

>>1419419
>you aren't in a defensive mindset
Oh so you argue that the mob was reading his mind? Interesting argument!
You can't construe his actions as being hostile, so instead you claim that he had hostile thoughts, and somehow this violent mob read his mind and that justified attacking him

lol anon. lmao even. Never become an attorney.

>>1419425
It's got nothing to do with the others and everything to do with him. He already won his case, but it's clear he was interested in committing violence against those he perceived as "criminals" and went somewhere where he believed he'd find them with a gun. Why is that hard for you to admit?
You'll be happy to know I passed the bar first time btw

>>1419428
>You'll be happy to know I passed the bar first time btw
Congrats, you've managed to pass the bar while lacking integrity. Many such cases.

>>1419419
>Saying you want to shoot shoplifters goes to mental state.
Newsflash Anon, most Americans don't like shoplifters. Or criminals in general... well unless you're a democrat, and then you'll jump through a dozen hoops to justify their behavior.

>If you say you want to shoot people and then go somewhere where an opportunity has potential to arise for you do do so,
Outside? Where his friends live? Where we works? In a town 15 minutes away from where he currently resides?

Oh by the way! That reminds me how obsessed you people were about borders five years ago. "HE CROSSED STATE LINES REEEEEE!!!!"

>then you aren't in a defensive mindset.
His "mindset" was to put out fires and give medical aid. Which he did.

This is the secret that you leftists fuck up every single time: he wasn't larping as a cop. He was larping as a firefighter.
>in before durr firefighters don't carry AR-15s and I'm a faggot who doesn't understand Wisconsin gun laws

>Not that it really matters since you're basically saying it's okay when tittenhouse does it but when armed, masked men show up to a farm you're ready to lick boot and be outraged at people actually defending themselves
>actually defending themselves
Yes that guy firing a pistol (lethal) at a line of police officers throwing tear gas (non-lethal) was totally in fear for his life. Holy shit you monkeys perform the most amazing mental gymnastics.

>>1419428
>It's got nothing to do with the others and everything to do with him.
I disagree.
It's as much him as others. It was proven his actions were not instigating a fight, and it was proven that the mobs actions justified his defense of self with lethal force.
If you want to argue his thoughts justified the mobs actions you are arguing for the existence of clairvoyance or mind reading.
>it's clear he was interested in committing violence against those he perceived as "criminals"
Not to anyone who was on the jury, and not to the majority of Americans, this is a rather unpopular opinion overall
>Why is that hard for you to admit?
Because it's simply not true. Your entire argument is based on what you apparently believe is your ability to read people's thoughts over vast distances.

>>1419428
>but it's clear he was interested in committing violence against those he perceived as "criminals"
>as he did everything humanly possible to avoid violence
>ran away from violence
>only shot when he was prevented from running away from violence
Y'know as far as plans go to intentionally kill people, this is the most ass-backwards way to do it.

>You'll be happy to know I passed the bar first time btw
So did Binger. How'd that work out for him at the trial?

>chuds are still waxing nostalgic over the Rottenhouse case ITT
kek

>>1419464
To be fair, nostalgia is a great word for it. The left took the heaviest Ls over that case, to the point where even far-left faggots like Destiny were against them. It's always amazing to me how blue-state fags like to brag how they have the more educated population, more college degrees, higher IQs, etc. but when it came to Rittenhouse they were too stupid to use a search engine to fact-check any of the dumb shit they were saying:
>HE CROSSED STATE LINES WITH AN AUTOMATIC WEAPON
>HIS MOTHER DROPPED HIM OFF AT THE RIOT
>HE FIRED SIXTY ROUNDS INTO A CROWD OF BLACK PEOPLE
>HIS WEAPON WAS ILLEGAL AND OURS WEREN'T
>HE'S A WHITE SUPREMACIST

>>1419466
i can tell this is your favorite subject, shill. the kenosha kid's 15 minutes were up a long time ago though

>>1419471
And yet you guys brought him up. I warned you.

>>1419472
you don't have to warn us that you're a faggot, we already know

>>1419466
>"The left"
>far left faggots like Destiny
>blue state fags
Tell us more about these boogeymen who live in your head.

>>1419466
>>1419472
Good posts

>>1419491
you really are too dumb to get a job anywhere else, huh shill

>>1419491
Thank you.

>>1419493
So upset that five years later you're still losing every Rittenhouse debate. It helps if you research basic facts before posting.

Left wing terrorists continue to plot the cold blooded murder of federal agents, unaware that the majority of Americans want the illegal aliens out of their country

>>1419501
>Thank you.
Any time. Im not afraid to call it like I see it

>>1419501
every time i call you an esl shill you say i'm upset. you're the one with the upsettingly subpar life

>>1419501
>So upset that five years later you're still losing every Rittenhouse debate. It helps if you research basic facts before posting.
Rittenhouse is not a winning argument for them, but honestly what I find most surprising is what you pointed out in the second half of their post. It's like they lack basic internet literacy and think people won't research their wildly unusual claims

>>1419600
stop talking to yourself faggot. you truly are a shameless liar

I thought ending fedboys was cool?

>>1419607
gun rights fags are single issue police murderers

>>1419608
"I'll shoot any masked up fed glowies that come to my town and start abducting people with no probable cause"
turned real quick into
YOU ARE CHEERING ON ANTFIA SHOOTING LEGAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TRAITOR

Republicunts yearn for the boot

>>1419609
Tyranny is only tyranny when the state overreaches.
Glowies jackbooting traitors that harbor illegals and wage war against the US gov isn't tyranny, it's one of the few legitimate things they were originally designed to do.

>>1419617
how do you fuck up the english language every single day you post here, shill? have you tried bartending?

>>1419607
That was back when the fedboys were blue. Now they're red so you have to slurp up all the boot polish you can.

>>1419618
You should be less concerned about the formatting of my posts and more about your physical location in this country relative to the nearest ICE detainment facility.

>>1419620
you haven't convinced anyone you're white or american yet. it's getting kind of pathetic

>>1419621
I don't think attacking the people who want to protect the country puts you on the winning side, anon.

>>1419622
maybe you should tell your bosses for more autonomy, when you spam your talking points over and over it makes the fact that you're a shill quite obvious

>>1419622
maybe you should tell your bosses you need more autonomy, when you spam your talking points over and over it makes the fact that you're a shill quite obvious

>>1419624
You do remember that we're in a thread about team blue shooting at federal agents, right?

>>1419625
we're in another of your inexhaustible shill threads, i'm aware. you do remember that i like making fun of you, right

>>1419625
The person you are arguing with is the single most insufferable person on this board.
His imagination stretches as far as "esl", "paid shill" and "Ivan"
I doubt he even knows how to use the Internet to to research his claims. Or more likely, he doesn't care if what he says is real and that's why he just lies and then resorts to name calling when someone proves him wrong by posting a source

>>1419335 (OP)
Oh hey update on this.
200 arrested, one dead. The drug farm was illegally employing child laborers as well.

Hard to defend behavior such as this, but leftists will do it anyway

>>1419627
u mad, samefag?

>>1419630
the fact that you can brag about a concentration camp surrounded by alligators and then pivot to claiming the federalized gestapo is saving children really highlights how delusional the entire maga camp has become

>>1419634
>you can brag about a concentration camp surrounded by alligators
I've never done this, you are confusing me with the bogeymen that live in your head

>>1419636
>bogeyman
looks like your esldom has betrayed you again. english isn't east, is it

>>1419636
>bogeyman
looks like your esldom has betrayed you again. english isn't easy, is it

And he is right back to as I described here: >>1419627
Acting out. Like clockwork.

>>1419640
being haughty won't stop me from calling you a faggot shill who needs to get a real job

>>1419638
>looks like your esldom has betrayed you again. english isn't east, is it
I find it quite easy. The word you were looking for was "easy" btw

esl shill is replying to imaginary posts again. someone should really get him the help he needs

https://archive.palanq.win/news/thread/1419335/#1419638
And back he goes to the lying.

>>1419644
no one cares about your links nerd

>>1419634
Hey there! Illegal Aliens have the option to turn themselves in and receive $1000 USD as well as a plane ticket to their home country! Only those who refuse to obey the laws regarding entry into the USA are at risk of arrest, injury, and/or death! Just like the left wing terrorists who plot to murder federal agents! Hope this helps!

>>1419647
How long until blacks abuse this policy to get free vacation tickets and spending money?
Hell, I'm thinking about doing it myself and I'm lily white.

>>1419647
Yeah he doesn't care. He's just here to shit up the board, not have honest discussion

I wonder if there are any mods at all on this board?

>>1419676
Mods are universal, jannies are per board. My guess is zero jannies or one jannie who also has five or six other slow boards and only logs on once a week and none of the mods care about it enough to check in.

>>1419676
There are, but they're left-biased. They don't give a shit about anons like the one that can't use punctuation spamming every thread with "you're not american", "esl shill" or "no one cares about your links nerd" - but if you respond the same way you'll catch a 3-day ban from all boards.

>>1419743
you poor little baby

>>1419743
Imagine being this far to the right.

>>1419676
>1 post per hour text board
>invented only because /pol/ could not enforce a current event link and avoid posting in b8 threads
>only board without a useful catalog
>spammers ignore because they don't get enough views or engagement
They don't care.

This article needs to be at the top

Bump

>>1419335 (OP)
Distrust of overreaching dictators is a good thing, pal.

>>1419335 (OP)
Is your country willing to die for God? Die fighting with or against Him? You will bow.