FBI Director Kash Patel ALSO Considering Resigning If Pam Bondi Keeps Her Job, Per Report

https://www.mediaite.com/politics/just-in-fbi-director-kash-patel-also-considering-resigning-if-pam-bondi-keeps-her-job-per-report/

FBI Director Kash Patel may reportedly join Deputy Director Dan Bongino in resigning if Attorney General Pam Bondi keeps her job.

According to a Friday report from Axios, Bongino and Bondi clashed over President Donald Trump’s administration’s handling of the case of convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. The Justice Department, led by Bondi, released a joint memo with the FBI announcing that the rumored “Epstein list” naming his associates never really existed. That conclusion contradicted Bondi’s previous claims that the supposed list was on her desk.

As a result, Bongino and Bondi reportedly got into it. That led to Bongino taking off from work on Friday “in protest.” The deputy director, according to The Daily Wire’s Mary Margaret Olohan, had also made it clear that he would be leaving his post if Bondi kept hers.

Not long after that reporting, Olohan added that Patel has joined Bongino in his stand against Bondi.

“Source close to DOJ says Kash Patel also wants Pam Bondi gone, and that he’d consider leaving if Bongino leaves,” Olohan said. “Also that there are more frustrations with other documents Bondi hasn’t released.”

>>1419673 (OP)
>report from Axios
Nothing to see here

>>1419673 (OP)
It only took 6 months for the Trump lackeys to start fleeing the sinking ship, even shorter than it was in the first term.

>epstien's notebook of contacts and phone numbers already released
>epstein's US flight logs already released
>little st james manifests not released
>epstein and maxwell convicted of pimping minors
>list of johns not released
>aktchully, epstein didn't write a master list of johns and chronical all his illegal acts on a notarized document so it doesn't exist
Everyone already knows the list is US politicians, CEOs and other elites that mossad wanted to influence.

>>1419801
What makes you think only US politicians and CEOs are involved?

>>1419673 (OP)
The rumor is Trump will replace Bondi with Matt Gaetz.

And now Trump's saying the list exists, but it's fake and written by Dems to slander somebody who might be on it. Also stop asking about MLK and JFK.

Guys, I hate to say it, but I think Trump was involved with the MLK and JFK assassinations.

Also, he's obviously a rapist, but we already knew that.

>>1419852
>And now Trump's saying the list exists, but it's fake
so he's on it

>>1419871
That was never in doubt.

>>1419852
>written by Dems
Even more reason to release the Epstein Files, to own the libs: it would destroy the Democrats if they did. Releasing such was a point in Trump's campaign last year.
>there is no list, MAGAtards can only say now, even though this was their only possible opportunity to utterly obliterate their mortal enemy: libs
It's because that list not only exists, but Trump's name does on it, too. It's said that if released, that list would destroy the US as we know it.
When even Trumptards value the Uniparty too much, the fact that even MAGA as an 'idea' would die once their orange god takes that last trip on Marine One on 20th January 2029 and it's all over for them as they see their only dope... I mean hope for a more than two terms dictator that becomes politically impotent after the midterms is the best they can get now.
It's so obvious that Trump's name is on that list, even Stevie Wonder can see it.

>>1419878
>MAGA as an 'idea' would die once their orange god takes that last trip on Marine One on 20th January 2029
We're cursed. I forsee that Trump will stroke out and die in office, and MAGA will live forever defending their orange martyr who was brutuslly murdered by the deep state in order to protect the Epstein files

>>1419852
There's one of two potential scenarios at play.
1) Trump doesn't actually know what the fuck is going on, a comprehensive list doesn't actually exist, and the public is running around with conspiracy memes.
2) Trump knows something which is indicative of an actual nation-wide conspiracy, and he's refusing to release it out of a sense of preservation (for himself or the union).

There's also a potential third option where Israel is holding a gun to the back of his head and coercing him to shut this shit down. Trump threatening to strip citizenship from Rosie o'Donnell and calling her a "threat to humanity" for talking about the client list is deeply concerning.

>>1419885
You left out
3) A comprehensive list doesn't actually exist, the public is running around with conspiracy memes because the right has said it was a conspiracy for years including *after getting back in office*, and now Trump is trying to get his base to turn against releasing the list because they don't actually have a list to release like they promised

Classic mouth writing a check your ass can't cash scenario.

Frankly, closing the case was a dumbass move. They could have kept it open another 4 years and closed it right after the next presidential. It's not like redhats are hard to lead on.

>>1419885
>Trump threatening to strip citizenship from Jewish Rosie o'Donnell and calling her a "threat to humanity" for talking about mossad blackmail list is deeply concerning.
Give up your inquiries which are completely useless, and consider these words a second warning · We hope, for your own good, that this will be sufficient

>>1419888
but Bondi stated to the press that the list was on her desk. Pretty fucking convenient to forget that little detail.

>>1419890
>but Bondi stated to the press that the list was on her desk
Bondi stated a lot of bullshit. Like there was new information in a binder full of shit that had already been released (with less redactions even). Or confusing the number of victims by a factor of 100.

My best guess is they were going to inflate this shit to drag it out to make it seem like they were in an eternal battle with the deep state pedos and then decided to reverse course and pull the plug when somebody thought that was unsustainable.

Basic rule of politics is underpromise and overdeliver and they were doing the opposite.

>>1419889
Eyes wide such was such a good movie. Shame they killed Kubrick after that.

>>1419888
>comprehensive list doesn't actually exist
According to Pam Bondi they have literal mountains of footage and photographs of clients screwing kids, but they still can't figure out who the fuck was involved, supposedly.

>>1419899
As Trump admitted, you don't want to publicly embarrass pedophiles.

>>1419895
>Yeah so she lied, so what?

>>1419898
eyes wide shut sucked, but that's because they ruined it in post to spite kubrick

>>1419905
>so what?
I'm not saying the lying was a good thing.

And yeah, so what? What are you or anyone else going to do about it? Even now I'm not expecting any political consequences for anyone from this shit. The only reason Trump would fire Pam Bondi was to replace her with someone that was going to produce a list he would be on if it exists, so that shit's not happening. And redhats are such dumb goldfish-brained cocksuckers that best case scenario they'll blame the underlings because Trump is a little baby boy who isn't responsible for the people he hires and worst case scenario won't even remember this shit happened by the time the next election rolls around.

This circus is completely meaningless in the grand scheme of things, just like when Trump's cabinet was discussing classified military operations on an unsecure comms system and just like the next major scandal will be.

Shall we start taking bets? I'm guessing it will be Alligator Auschwitz floods, killing thousands. Or maybe Trump has a judge's house raided for ruling against him.

>>1419899
>According to Pam Bondi
See
>>1419895

>>1419918
>What are you or anyone else going to do about it?
Republicans are nearing french revolution levels of anger and you're seriously asking this question?
Also, there's a massive difference between getting the amount of material wrong and denying it exists at all. The only reason why democrats haven't capitalized on this shit to break up the MAGA base is because this is a bipartisan issue that would utterly destroy our party system.

>>1419673 (OP)
LET PAM BONDI DO HER JOB - SHE'S GREAT! The 2020 Election was Rigged and Stolen, and they tried to do the same thing in 2024 - That's what she is looking into as AG, and much more. One year ago our Country was DEAD, now it's the HOTTEST Country anywhere in the World. Let's keep it that way and not waste TIME and ENERGY on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about.

>>1419925
>Republicans are nearing french revolution levels of anger and you're seriously asking this question?
Honestly, yes. The only thing I've seen from Republicans since Trump arrived on the scene is unhinged worship and complete subservience to whatever the current narrative is.

>The only reason why democrats haven't capitalized on this shit to break up the MAGA base is because this is a bipartisan issue that would utterly destroy our party system.
This is dumb as fuck. Dems don't give 2 shits about our party system. The Dem party sucks donkey dick. Dems haven't capitalized on this shit because we've been calling Trump a rapist for years, even proved it in court, and nobody on the right gave a shit. What the fuck do you expect us to do different? You don't listen to us in the first fucking place. Hell, Dems arguing this shit probably turns more Trump voters against the belief that Trump's a rapist than anything.

You're expecting me to believe Republicans are going to suddenly give a shit now, when none of the evidence against Trump vis a vis Epstein is new and when "the storm was coming" the entire first Trump term and never manifested? Trump won reelection. It's over. Everyone lost.

And really Republicans being pro-pedo is nothing new. Roy Moore got 48.34% of the vote and he wasn't even Trump.

>>1419925
>Republicans are nearing french revolution levels of anger and you're seriously asking this question?
Let's play a game. What are you *you* *personally* going to do about this shit? Gonna change how you vote? Gonna get involved in politics? Gonna donate to the political opposition or support groups for victims of child trafficking? Maybe protest or something even more revolutionary?

You won't do shit, so stop pretending anyone else will.

>>1419978
>You won't do shit, so stop pretending anyone else will.
I don't advocate for rebellion. I'm just saying, if the gov is covering up the mass rape of children for the sake of Israel and refuses to do anything about it, then revolution is a potential outcome.

If our elected leaders are being controlled by a foreign power, and they're not obeying the will of the electorate, then we're technically not a democracy anymore.

people act like rage is a bad thing.

Rage is a good thing the best soldiers were up a raged/frenzied/berserk state when they were on the frontline trust.

Better to be angry than be docile little soyboy nowadays g, a lot of things to be pissed about in the modern world also.

So, who will replace Bondi as AG? Gaetz? Charles Manson? How about one of his sons? That is straight out of the JFK playbook.

>>1419995
>I don't advocate for rebellion
I gave you a range of options, the least of which was changing your vote or donating to anti-trafficking groups. If you can't even commit to the mildest course of action don't expect anyone else to do jack shit.

Taking the position that a meaningful part of the Republican party is any better than you is a shit bet. It's over. You lose.

>If our elected leaders are being controlled by a foreign power, and they're not obeying the will of the electorate, then we're technically not a democracy anymore.
The electorate is a bunch of cucks like you that put Trump in power knowing what he was. Don't pretend they aren't getting what they voted for. We're still a democracy. It's just a politically persuasive part of our electorate knowingly worship foreign owned rapists and nothing Trump or anyone else could do will ever change that.

You made your bed, now lie in it.

>>1420004
>You made your bed, now lie in it.
You'll all be lying in it too once the US starts trying to annex its neighbors.

>>1420007
>Sure we fucked up and are continuing to fuck up, but you're going to suffer the consequences too, so there
Not sure that's really an own so much as rank shamelessness.

>>1419996
>Rage is a good thing the best soldiers were up a raged/frenzied/berserk state when they were on the frontline trust.
Maybe in caveman times. Certainly not in the last 200 years.

>>1420007
Why does the US want to bring in more citizens that are going to be angry their president is covering up for global pedophiles?
Is Trump too busy fucking kids to care?