https://abcnews.go.com/US/us-olympic-paralympic-officials-bar-transgender-women-competing/story?id=123978340

US Olympic and Paralympic officials bar transgender women from competing in women's categories

Transgender women will no longer be eligible to compete for the United States in the Olympic or Paralympic Games in women's categories, after a recent policy change from the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC).

The committee cited President Donald Trump's February executive order, titled "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports," which mandates immediate enforcement, including against schools and athletic associations that "deny women single-sex sports and single-sex locker rooms," according to the document, and directs state attorneys general to identify best practices for enforcing the mandate.

In a memo to the Team USA community on Tuesday, obtained by ABC News, USOPC President Gene Sykes and CEO Sarah Hirshland referenced Trump's executive order and said, "As a federally chartered organization, we have an obligation to comply with federal expectations."

The USOPC is responsible for supporting, entering and overseeing U.S. teams in the Olympic and Paralympic Games as well as sporting events for all ages, from youth to masters' competitions.

In an update to its athlete safety policy, without using the word transgender by name, the USOPC said its revised policy "emphasizes the importance of ensuring fair and safe competition environments for women."

"The USOPC is committed to protecting opportunities for athletes participating in sport. The USOPC will continue to collaborate with various stakeholders with oversight responsibilities, e.g., IOC, IPC, NGBs, to ensure that women have a fair and safe competition environment consistent with Executive Order 14201 and the Ted Stevens Olympic & Amateur Sports Act," the revised policy says on the USOPC website.

The Ted Stevens Olympic & Amateur Sports Act establishes a process for handling eligibility disputes for each Olympic sport and participation in amateur athletic competitions. It was sponsored by Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens and adopted in 1998.

The revised USOPC policy also doesn't outline how the ban will work, and if the same ruling applies to men's sports.

ABC News has reached out to the USOPC for clarification and did not immediately hear back.

Following the revised policy, USA Fencing updated its gender eligibility guidelines, which will take effect on Aug. 1.

Transgender women, nonbinary athletes, transgender men and intersex athletes will compete exclusively in men's competitions, according to the policy.

In a statement to ABC News following the policy change, an International Olympic Committee (IOC) spokesperson said, "This is a highly complex topic which has been approached by International Federations and National Olympic Committees in different ways depending on their sport and their national legislation and context."

IOC members engaged in a workshop last month to discuss a proposal on "the protection of the female category" regarding transgender athletes being included in women's and girls' competitions.

The IOC spokesperson said there was "overwhelming support" from members of the international sports governing body in favor of the proposal.

>>1421875 (OP)
who cares

>>1421877
all of the leftists who spent the last 10 years telling us that men should be allowed to compete in women's sports

>>1421875 (OP)
>US Olympic and Paralympic officials bar transgender women from competing in women's categories
Wow
I'm surprised it took them this long to push back against all the troon propaganda that ballooned up over the last several years

>>1421877
OP has a notorious fetish for trannies
They literally post about them every chance they get, and admittedly read every single thread on /lbgt/

Doesn't that just mean that other countries that allow trannies in women's sports will trounce the US team?

>>1421902
>Doesn't that just mean that other countries that allow trannies in women's sports will trounce the US team?
No, because sport eligibility is based on hormone level, which is why you even see high-T cis women banned from "women's" Olympic sports.

Hormone level is what impacts performance.

>>1421902
Yes.

>>1421884
What do you mean propaganda? The evidence is certainly not on your side.
https://www.sf.gov/trans-women-in-sports-facts-over-fear
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/what-science-tells-us-about-transgender-athletes

Do you make your decisions based on memes and peer pressure?

the only sport that women compete in is judged by looks.

>>1421930
>What do you mean propaganda
I mean stuff released by the city of San Francisco saying that men don't have an unfair physical advantage in many women's sports

>>1421933
Yes, and were you going to respond to the scientific arguments being made any time this century?

>>1421934
Don't go to San Francisco. Problem solved.

>>1421934
>>1421934
>Yes
I'm glad we agree
>Trans people are estimated to make up 1-2% of the population of the United States; however, trans people make up less than less than 0.002% (10/500,000) of US college athletes, and even fewer of recent Olympians (0.001%) identify as trans.
Man given that the city of San Francisco says such a small number of athletes are trans, it's crazy they keep winning so championships and records in women's sports

>>1421875 (OP)
Men only play sports to gay grope each other while staying in the closet. So remember repubs your favorite team hides it as much as you do, closet fag.

>>1421875 (OP)
I'm a womyn who transitioned into a man
The testosterone that I take has given me big muscles and I bet I can beat the crap out of you Bigot scum OP. My fake penis was comes with an air pump is even bigger than yours

>>1421943
Keep track of every trans victory, do you?
We know you actively cheer for trans women to win so you can post headlines

>>1421958
No one does that but chuds.

>>1421884
Trans people have been participating in the Olympic since over 20 years. There has never been any evidence it made the competition unfair coming out of it.

>>1421943
>'s crazy they keep winning so championships and records in women's sports
Actually, they don't. There has been no disproportionate trans victory since they were allowed to compete.

>>1421967
Let them believe their own bullshit. They're more miserable that way.

>>1421930
>accuses others of making decisions based on peer pressure
>allows the San Francisco government to determine his opinions because he's not capable of forming his own opinion
I'll bet you also believed that supporting BLM makes people immune to COVID because that's what the hecking experts told you.

hormones are not the only difference between men and women you fucking NPC

>>1421877
>>1421901
the leftists and Democrats seething about this care. The leftists and Democrats desperately trying to gaslight us into thinking they never cared about this obviously care about us thinking they don't care.

>>1421902
yes. But I would rather lose with principles than win by cheating.
>>1421903
>hormone levels are the only biological difference between men and women
no

>>1421877
the picture in the OP is an actual US Congresswoman who cared so much that she wrote a letter to compel a sports league to allow men to compete as women and celebrated another lawsuit forcing another sports league to let men compete as women. But keep pretending that only Republicans care about this issue when this issue literally only exists because leftists made it an issue.

>>1421968
>>1421967
why aren't there more transmen winning sports? Since there's no difference between men and women other than hormones, there should be at least as many transmen winning right? Especially since transmen are usually butch lesbian tomboys (who tend to do very well in women's sports) while transwomen are sissy betas (who usually suck at sports) so if anything there should be a lot more transmen succeeding in sports than transwomen.

>>1421970
>why aren't there more transmen winning sports?
Because there are very few of them, just there isn't a significant amount of Transwomen winning sport as well.

>>1421970
>she wrote a letter to compel a sports league to allow men to compete as women
No she didn't. she write to allow transwomen.

>>1421877
So true. Let's talk about Drumpf in unrelated thread again

>>1421875 (OP)
BLACK LIVES MATTER
KILL ALL WHITE MEN
PROTECT TRANS KIDS

>>1421972
?
That's what I said?
>>1421971
but why are there so many more transwomen than transmen who succeed in sports? What is the reason for this? Why are sissy beta males doing better than butch lesbians when hormones are not a factor?

That's what I said?
No, you said she wanted men in sports, Transwomen aren't men. That's the scientific and medical consensus.
>>1421976
>but why are there so many more transwomen than transmen who succeed in sports?
There aren't.

>>1421875 (OP)
Mixed Doubles events in 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. As Nicola Adams - world's first woman boxer to win Olympic gold then did so again four years later - defended her title at Rio, Algeria's Imane Khelif will do the same at Los Angeles, thus probably denying a US woman boxer of a gold medal. OP's opinions BTFO eternally!
>Transgender women will no longer be eligible to compete for the United States in the Olympic or Paralympic Games in women's categories
Before 2012, LOCOG forced Saudi Arabia to include women athletes in their team at London. I'm afraid the Organizing Committees don't give a fuck for USOPC's opinions. BOCOG for Brisbane's Olympics in 2032 will probably do the same as LOCOG: force USOPC to have trans athletes in their team. Organizing Committees have that power.

>>1421877
>>1421877
>>1421877

Useless fence-sitter

>>1421978
>Transwomen aren't men
but they are though
>There aren't
but there are though

>>1421981
>but they are though
They are women according to the medical and scientific community.

>but there are though
Source?

>>1421982
a trans women is the same as fools gold according to the alchemy community

>>1421982
I identify as the medical and scientific community and transwomen are men. Checkmate.

>Source?
you first. Go show your source of transmen winning or placing the way that there have been plenty of examples (including on this board) of transwomen doing it.

good news, anything that pisses of the kind of people who think a man can turn into a women is fine with me.

>>1421969
>hormone levels are the only biological difference between men and women
Actually the claim was hormone level is the only difference between Olympic sports divisions because it governs performance. Which is true.

Strictly speaking there are not sex based divisions. Hence why high-T cis women are banned from competing against low-T women.

>>1421982
>>1421978
>but muh heckin EXPERTS!
I love /news/ because the leftists here can't help but expose themselves as pathetic NPCs incapable of thinking for themselves. Show me the evidence that a biological adult human male with XY chromosomes can magically transform into a biological adult human female. Show me the evidence that a biological adult human female with XX chromosomes can magically transform into a biological adult human male.
>but the experts said that--
what's the evidence?
>because the experts said--
what's the evidence?

NPCs literally don't understand this concept which is why every thread you just resort to parroting what you were told. You can't think for yourself at all.

>>1421986
And now men, regardless of hormones, are also banned from the women's division. Just like they always were before you gullible idiots decided to ignore biology just because "MUH HECKIN EXPERTS!" told you that a biological adult human male could magically transform and become genetically identical to a biological adult human female.
Seethe and cope.

>>1421984
>I identify as the medical and scientific community
You do not speak for them, so no.

>you first.
YOU are the one claiming transwomen win more competition than transmen, it's up to you to prove it.

>>1421987
>I love /news/ because the leftists here can't help but expose themselves as pathetic NPCs incapable of thinking for themselves.
Rejecting objective evidence is not "thinking by yourself", anon.
>Show me the evidence that a biological adult human male with XY chromosomes can magically transform into a biological adult human female
Magic has never been part of the argument and you know it, anon.

>what's the evidence?
https://www.endocrine.org/topics/transgender-medicine

> Just like they always were before
The Olympic has accepted trans athletes in the gender category they identify as since over 20 years, so no. And they will continue to do so as this ruling isn't binding to their committee.

>>1421988
I identified as it, please do not be a bigot.
>you first
this board has already provided dozens of examples while you have never provided any.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/transgender-teens-outrun-track-field-competitors-critics-close/story?id=55856294
State track competition where a boy got second place... behind another boy who got first. Show me the reverse. Show me two girls getting first and second place in a boys' track meet.

https://nypost.com/2025/04/05/us-news/trans-track-athlete-wins-varsity-girls-competition-after-previously-placing-last-against-jv-boys-report/
boy gets last place in high jump competing against boys. Then competes against girls and gets first place. Where are the girls getting last place against other girls and then winning against boys?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CeC%C3%A9_Telfer
Was ranked 200th and then 390th against other men. Then he won a national championship against women. Where are the women who are ranked so low against women but then win a national championship against men? If there's no biological difference then it should be happening as often too right?

Keep in mind that masculine women (ie transmen) are more likely to play sports while feminine men (ie transwomen) are less likely. So really we would expect more transmen.

>>1421987
>what's the evidence?
You can look at the many papers published on that topic, they have resisted peer-review, it's therefore up to you to prove them false.

>>1421990
>I identified as it, please do not be a bigot.
There is nothing bigoted about pointing out you are appropriating yourself the identity of a community you do no belong to.

>this board has already provided dozens of examples
Actually you haven't, you have provided anecdotal cases, not a statistical study.

you have stated that more transmen than transwomen have won competitions, PROVE IT!

>>1421989
Okay then show me the evidence that a biological adult human male with XY chromosomes can SCIENTIFICALLY transform into a biological adult human female with the power of SCIENCE and not magic because this is SCIENCE!!!

>NPC gets called out for not understanding evidence or being able to think for itself
>responds by dropping a link that is not evidence because the NPC doesn't know how to think
cite the evidence provided. Quote the evidence in that link that proves that a biological adult human male can transform into a biological adult human female. Quote the evidence in that link that proves chromosomes have nothing to do with an animal's biological sex.

>>1421993
>can SCIENTIFICALLY transform into a biological adult human female
It's called surgery and hormonal treatment. Beyond that, their brain are already of their identified gender to begin with.

>>NPC gets called out for not understanding evidence
Actually, YOU are the one who do not understand what a scientific consensus is and that it is therefore up to you to prove the consensus false.

>>1421991
>I'm an NPC who is not capable of understanding evidence or thinking for myself
thank you, I accept your concession
>>1421992
>appropriating yourself the identity of a community you do no belong to.
NPCs do not understand irony

>You didn't provide examples you just provided anecdotal cases!
God fucking damn I hate how illiterate your generation is.
I provided examples men winning women's competitions. My claim is that there are not an equal amount of examples of women winning men's competitions. You claim that there are. Since I have provided examples (and can provide many many more which has already happened on this board) and you have not, I accept your concession.

This thread is now over, thank you everybody for participating. Another victory for the Right!!!

>>1421994
Surgery and hormonal treatment do not change your biological sex and identity has nothing to do with your biological sex.
What evidence do you have that a biological adult human male can turn into a biological adult human female?
>You need to disprove my evidence!
what evidence?
>I don't have any evidence. But you need to disprove the evidence that I don't have.
lol.
Yeah, /thread

>>1421995
>thank you, I accept your concession
Actually, by refsing to make the effort to prove the consensus false, YOU have conceded to the consensus.
>NPCs do not understand irony
For there to be an irony, Gender should be similar to actually studying to get a diploma, it isn't.

>God fucking damn I hate how illiterate your generation is.
I was born in 1980 and YOU are the one who fail on th Anecdotal fallacy.

Providing example DOESN'T CONSTITUTE A PROOF.

You have made a statement, now show me the actual stats.

>>1421996
>Surgery and hormonal treatment do not change your biological sex
Gender idnetty and genitals aren't the same thing.

>what evidence?
Not MY evidence, you have to disprove the scientific and medical community. Until then, their consensus remains unchallenged.

>But you need to disprove the evidence that I don't have.
I provided you a source for what they form their consensus on. Go disprove that.

>>1421875 (OP)
The country is finally healing

>>1422006
>UK made Saudi Arabia not be misogynist for London Olympics
Four years from now, Brisbane will force this country to reopen the wound that is mutt bigots failing

>>1421987
>And now men, regardless of hormones, are also banned from the women's division
No, they aren't. The US doesn't control the rules for the Olympics, just the US Olympic team.

And, again, there isn't technically a women's division. Hence why high-T cis women are banned from competing against low-T women.

>>1421876
>The IOC spokesperson said there was "overwhelming support" from members of the international sports governing body in favor of the proposal.
All is as it should be

>>1421875 (OP)
>US says men cannot compete in women's Olympics
>>1422012
So the IOC are removing mixed doubles events in 2028 Los Angeles? Yes or No

>>1422013
>>US says men cannot compete in women's Olympics
At no point was there any men ever doing that to begin with. This isn't what this is about.

>>1422014
So there'll be no men in mixed doubles tennis, badminton & table tennis at Los Angeles?

>>1422014
You're talking to a retard who thinks pedophilia is okay, you're not going to get a sane or rational response back

>>1422015
Learn to read.

A 2021 literature review concluded that for trans women, even with testosterone suppression, "the data show that strength, lean body mass, muscle size and bone density are only trivially affected. The reductions observed in muscle mass, size, and strength are very small compared to the baseline differences between males and females in these variables, and thus, there are major performance and safety implications in sports where these attributes are competitively significant."[93] After 24 months of testosterone suppression, bone mass is generally preserved. The review states that no study has reported muscle loss greater than 12% with testosterone suppression even after three years of hormone therapy.[93] It found that trans women are in the top 10% of females regarding lean body mass and possess a grip 25% stronger than most females.[93] They suggest that instead of universal guidelines, each individual sport federation decide how to "balance between inclusion, safety and fairness" due to differences between sports.[93]

A 2021 systematic review found that significant decreases in measures of strength, lean body mass and muscle area were observed after 12 months of hormone therapy, while the values remained above those observed in cisgender women, even after 36 months, suggesting that trans women "may retain strength advantages over cisgender women." Effects of longer duration therapy were unclear due to scarcity of data.[94]

A 38-page draft document from World Rugby's transgender working group in 2020 acknowledged that rugby players who are cisgender women, when tackled by a player who has gone through male puberty, are at a significantly greater risk of injury. The working group calculated that increased injury risk for typical players with female characteristics when tackled by a typical player with male characteristics was between 20 and 30%, and potentially reaching "levels twice as large" in extreme cases where the players are unusually small and large, respectively. Consequently, the document proposes that in the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, International Olympic Committee (IOC) guidelines regarding a minimum 12-month lowering of testosterone are "not fit for purpose" in the context of rugby.[98]

>>1422018
>>1422019
but in term of actual result, Has there been a disproportionate amount of trans athletes winning? We have got years of record to showcase that.

>>1422026
>There's no science to show that troons are better athletes than women!
>Well, ok, there's *a lot* of science that proves it's but has there been a disproportionate amount of trans athletes winning?
Yes
0.002% of athletes are trans and they win a disproportionate rate of competitions. Literally 30 seconds of googling turned up a 2024 article naming 29 troons who won state, national or international titles in women’s sports since 2022.
For this number to be proportional to the overall rate of 0.002% this means that trans athletes would have had to compete in 29/0.002% = 29/0.00002 = 1,450,000 competitions over that same time frame, And I don't think there's enough trans athletes going around to compete in that level of competition in just 2 years


I know you hate science, but science is science and you need to accept it. A man who takes hormones is still a biological man, and hormones do not undo decades of biological male growth to skeletal and muscular structures

>>1422027
>and they win a disproportionate rate of competitions
Source?
> Literally 30 seconds of googling turned up a 2024 article naming 29
Anecdotal finding again, give me the actual stats. You know those competitions are actually on records, right? It shouldn't so hard to find out if an excessive amount of them win.

>>1422028
Glad to know you support the abolishment of gender segregation in sports.

>>1422034
Not really.

>>1422034
So no sources?
Do you just have a confirmation bias because of your notorious tranny fetish?
I guarantee you if you stop searching for tranny news, you'll stop seeing news about trannies.
All you gotta do is stop typing it into search bars outside of your preferred porn sites.
Its literally that easy to escape the outrage machine you've built around yourself.

>>1422034
>>1422019
>>1422018
nice source but also stop arguing, the thread is closed. See >>1421995 and >>1421996 the leftists already conceded and admitted defeat, we won. They admitted that there are many times more examples of MtF winning against women than there are FtM winning against men and they also admitted that they don't have any evidence that biological male humans can somehow turn into biological female humans.

1422037
>who cares about your evidence my sockpuppets already declared you're wrong lol
You don't have to admit you were BTFO this hard, shill

>>1422037
>the leftists already conceded and admitted defeat
nope see >>1421997
>>1421998

Arguing with a rando online while refusing to prove wrong actual experts on the matter will not make you magically right.

>>1422037
>They admitted that there are many times more examples of MtF winning against women than there are FtM winning
Where?

And you still haven't brought up any actual stats. Do you have short-term memory issues?

>>1422040
>Do you have short-term memory issues?
that is one of the foremost traits a shill requires

>>1422037
Good post.
Accurate

>>1422044
How so? It's just denial, the post.

>>1422037
I concur. Good post.

>>1422039
>nope
Yup. He's already given several examples of tranny men beating women at sports. You can't even give one example of a woman beating a man. By default you lose.

>>1422040
>Where?
Even I'm sick of your bullshit. He's posted several articles from several different news organizations (abcnews, nypost, etc.) and you're still asking for evidence.

I think your people call this sealioning on reddit.

>>1422046
>nypost
>news
LMAO

>>1422045
Numerous scientific studies have proven that just because you have low testosterone for a few months, it doesn't undo decades of biological male growth

I know you hate science, but you should really try to accept the facts

>>1422046
>Good post
Since when try hard display of denial is good posting?

>He's already given several examples
Your brain really has a hard time registering that anecdotal events don't constitute proofs. Show me actual stats.

>Even I'm sick of your bullshit.
I am not the one pretending to have "won the argument" while failing to provide any actual evidence.

>>1422048
>Numerous scientific studies have proven that just because you have low testosterone for a few months, it doesn't undo decades of biological male growth
Now show me the actual sports stats reflecting that.

>>1422050
>Since when try hard display of denial is good posting?
You tell me, faggot. That's all you've been doing in this thread.

>Your brain really has a hard time registering that anecdotal events don't constitute proofs.
And you're too retarded to understand the very simple concept that the anon who posts several examples has far more evidence than the anon that can't provide jack shit.
>Show me actual stats.
Suck my cock. If that other anon you've been arguing with for four fucking hours wants to waste his time compiling a list that you'll just ignore anyways then he can knock himself out, but I'm not going through every single sport in the Olympics just to appease your monkey ass. Either show some female-to-male athletes dominating men in physical sports or shut your fucking mouth.

>I am not the one pretending to have "won the argument" while failing to provide any actual evidence.
That's actually what you're doing. I think they call this projection.

lmao, tranny shill is melting down between gooning seshes

>>1422050
>Now show me the actual sports stats reflecting that
Do you want scientific studies that have attempted to explain these sports stats and determined that hormone therapy is ineffective in reducing the biological athletic gap between males and females?
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9331831/
>Male physiology cannot be reformatted by estrogen therapy in transwoman athletes because testosterone has driven permanent effects through early life exposure. This descriptive critical review discusses the inherent male physiological advantages that lead to superior athletic performance and then addresses how estrogen therapy fails to create a female-like physiology in the male. Ultimately, the former male physiology of transwoman athletes provides them with a physiological advantage over the cis-female athlete.

>>1422050
>Now show me the actual sports stats reflecting that
Maybe this? https://kfoxtv.com/news/nation-world/un-study-reveals-transgender-athletes-have-won-nearly-900-medals-in-womens-competitions-united-nations-sports-lgbt-gender-identity-title-ix-athletics
>UN study reveals transgender athletes have won nearly 900 medals in women's competitions

>>1422058
>Fox
>pretending an admitted propaganda outlet that deliberately writes articles to rile up morons and paid out hundreds of millions of dollars for lying is proof of anything

So thats one article against you, and none of the sports stats that would show what you're claiming.
Are you even trying to argue your point?
Feel free to take two turns since you just proved yourself wrong.

>>1422056
This boards "tranny shill" regularly goes on unhinged meltdowns after being btfo. You should have saw the one yesterday.

>>1422059
Just shut up already. You've been btfo with probably half a dozen scientific studies and a UN study all highlighting the fact that the men who are competing in women's sports are winning extremely frequently because they are biological men despite their low T.

You've lost.

>>1422060
my brother in Christ, the tranny shill made this thread and has been melting down in it all day

pretty much the case for every thread about trannies on this board

>>1422059
At least he provided something. Still waiting on you to find me an example of a female-to-male tranny beating the dogshit out of men in sports.

Get to work, boy.

>shill melts down, demands everyone else slurp their shillslop and accept being btfo
lmao, reality continues to kick shill ass

>>1422014
>>1422016
>supporting a policy under a president that is a pedo
You're neither sane nor rational until you stop being right wing and therefore bigoted

>>1421875 (OP)
>US says men cannot compete in women's Olympics
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/2025/04/09/olympics-2028-mixed-gender-events-golf-gymnastics/83010555007/
'The 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles will feature an expanded program with new mixed-gender team events in several marquee sports, including golf and gymnastics'
Rightists' opinions BTFO forever!

It seems sad on some deep level that the shill is sockpuppeting in order to finally win an argument.
Maybe one day there will be a leftist dumb enough to lose to that tranny obsessed faggot in a battle of wits, but anyone that dumb is almost certainly a conservative, if not a full MAGA pedophile enabler

>>1422067
>new mixed-gender team events
That's not "women's sports" you unhinged retard. That's "mixed-gender" sports

It's like you are legitimately mentally retarded

>>1422072
>mixed-gender
>Imane Khelif defending 2024 Paris boxing title in 2028 Los Angeles
>there's less than nothing that anyone can do to stop this boxer competing in 2028 Olympics
>mixed-gender
Glad you agree

>>1422072
>That's not "women's sports" you unhinged retard
>Women's Golf
>Women's Gymnastics
>two sports that will just happen to have those who aren't women participating
Seems that trans women are making certain so-called 'men' in /news/ unhinged, or they would be among those men who aren't bothered by trans women in sports because they aren't subhuman bigots

>>1422076
>>1422067
so a team of only men, with no women, would be allowed to compete in this mixed-gender event?

>>1422067
>https://eu.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/2025/04/09/olympics-2028-mixed-gender-events-golf-gymnastics/83010555007/
>men and women competing in the same team
>men and women
I'm sorry, what part of this equals "women's Olympics"? Are you legitimately retarded?

>>1422082
So a team with women including men shouldn't be allowed to compete in mixed-gender events?
>>1422083
>retarded
I'm not the one whining about certain people in sports, so you tell me.

>>1422080
I don't think OP is a subhuman bigot.
I think OP just wants to fuck young feminine boys and is raging that their type is going trans instead

>>1422084
>So a team with women including men shouldn't be allowed to compete in mixed-gender events?
>So a mixed-gender team shouldn't be allowed to compete in mixed-gender events
LMAO the leftist NPCs are completely mind-broken. You literally don't even understand what you're saying at this point.

>>1422086
Meanwhile, because rightist NPCs are unhinged by the mere existence of trans people, others understand them only too well: those mindbroken by those who are trans are subhuman bigots

>>1422083
>Are you legitimately retarded?
Why yes, it is legitimately retarded

>>1422087
Only in your crazy, delusional mind. Have fun being so unhinged, I guess

>>1422087
>bigot
I'm just going to start dismissing everyone who uses this word. It's like a code word for "I have no argument".

Are the trans people in the room with us? Now point out on the doll where trans people touched you personally, >>1422090 >>1422091

>>1422091
I've never seen the tranny obsessed shill use the word bigot, so it definitely doesn't mean what you think it means

>>1422091
Your making him freak out, maybe you should stop. He's been btfo enough already

>>1422096
But only in your mind

>>1422091
>>1422093
>>1422096
Get a room you three

Progressive here, sports are segregated by born sex for the purpose of aligning athletic competencies for fairness. Changing your gender doesn't change your born sex, therefore changing your gender doesn't get you into sporting divisions of a sex that doesn't match your born sex. It's really simple and I don't understand why I'm called transphobic for understanding these simple facts about sports.

>>1422100
Why does something as simple as this make some people freak out?

>>1422100
Good post

>>1422100
>>1422102
>>1422106
bfto so hard they're sameposting
when they say being obsessed with tranys rots your brain this guy is the poster child

>>1422106
Fuck off schizo faggot. I never needed or wanted your approval.

>>1422107
>Oh God he's unhinged again

>>1422100
Sadly there's a schizo in this thread profusely arguing that you are wrong, despite the fact they can produce no evidence to support their claim

>>1421877
Exactly. This effects like 9 fucking people.

>>1422114
I agree. This is just a return to normal and society is no longer agreeing to pretend to believe the delusions of the mentally ill

>>1422055
>That's all you've been doing in this thread.
No, I have asked for proofs for your statements which you have failed to provide.

I have seen no hard sport statistic proving your claim nor any success on disproving the medical and scientificconsensus.

>And you're too retarded to understand the very simple concept that the anon who posts several examples has far more evidence
No, YOU are the one with the lack of mental ability to not understand what an anecdotal fallacy actually is. This isn't evidences, give me the actual stats.

>Suck my cock.
I accept your concession.

>>1422057
>that have attempted to explain these sports stats
Which sport stats, you still haven't shown any. Also, please note that what you posted doesn't apply to those who transition before puberty.

>>1422061
>>1422058
>>1422064
The initial claim was that transwomen have won more competitions than transmen. Your article isn't showing that.

You still haven't backed that claim yet. At no point have I ever denied transwomen didn't win competitions and this is all your article provided.

>>1422066
>>supporting a policy under a president that is a pedo
That is not how it works, anon.

>>1422100
>>1422111
>>1422107
>>1422106
>>1422102
Hormonal treatment have been shown to affect performance and your statement hasn't been proved to apply to people who transition before puberty.

>>1422100
>therefore changing your gender doesn't get you into sporting divisions of a sex that doesn't match your born sex.
Show me the sport stats that show trans people win disproportionately.

>>1422115
Denying the medical and scientific consensus is not a "return to normal".

>>1422139
>No, I have asked for proofs for your statements
>your
Nigga, I'm not the guy you've been arguing with for hours. Nonetheless,
>which you have failed to provide.
He's given you multiple examples. You've yet to give a counter-example.

>I have seen no hard sport statistic proving your claim
See >>1422058
In before durr I don't like his source so it doesn't count.
>No, YOU are the one with the lack of mental ability to not understand what an anecdotal fallacy actually is.
900 anecdotes is not a fucking anecdote at this point. It's a god damn trend.
>This isn't evidences
It's way more "evidences" than anything you've providedl.
>give me the actual stats.
And I already told you to go fuck yourself. Other people can do that, one even tried to do that, and you dismissed it - like I fucking said you would - without even bothering to look at the link.

>I accept your concession.
And I accept that you're a worthless retard that can't accept facts even if they're shoved down your throat. There are hundreds of examples of men beating women in sports, not one example of a woman beating men in sports that you can provide.

>The initial claim was that transwomen have won more competitions than transmen.
And that's been demonstrated hundreds of times. Any reasonable person would've considered this sufficient evidence.
>Your article isn't showing that.
His article, along with several other articles him and others have posted, do show that. You just can't accept it.
>You still haven't backed that claim yet.
He's done more than you have. I'm still waiting to see one example - just one - of a female tranny beating men in sports. Can you give one example? Just one? For me? Please? With sugar on top?

No? Figured as much.

>At no point have I ever denied transwomen didn't win competitions
Overwhelmingly more than transmen. Right now the scoreboard is 900+ (their stance) to 0 (your retarded stance).

So like I said, get to work boy.

>>1422146
>He's given you multiple examples.
Unable to comprehend that anecdotal events DOESN'T establish transwomen win more competation than trans men AS A WHOLE

You keeping ignoring that point won't make it magically go away.

>See >>1422058
Well, thank you for establishing you do not read AGAIN!

Showing me women winning competition doesn't establish they win them more than men, nor doe this establish that they win them disproportionally.

It's not about me not liking the source, it's that what you provided fail to prove your point.

>And I accept that you're a worthless retard
I am not the one who fail to understand the anecdotal fallacy.

>And that's been demonstrated hundreds of times
Anecdotal events do not prove that.
>His article, along with several other articles him and others have posted, do show that
Anecdotal events do not prove that. Show me the ACTUAL SPORT STATS. Those are on official records.

>He's done more than you have.
Let me repeat this again: ANECDOTAL EVENTS DO NOT PROVE ANYTHING!

Are you going to keep ignoring that?

>Overwhelmingly more than transmen.
Source? No anecdotal events, please, Actual stats based on sport record. Olympic has more than 20 years on it. Go do your work, now.

>>1422149
>Unable to comprehend that anecdotal events DOESN'T establish transwomen win more competation than trans men AS A WHOLE
It does when he's given hundreds of examples and you haven't given one. I'm already tired of dealing with your bullshit.

Until otherwise proven, he is correct and you are not.

Now ante up with some examples of female-to-male trans victories in men's sports or fuck off and kill yourself. I'm not in the god damn mood to go around in circles with you for hours like everyone else has done since yesterday.

>>1422146
>He's given you multiple examples.
What he has actualy done is showing he is unnable to comprehend that anecdotal events DON'T establish transwomen win more competitions than trans men AS A WHOLE

You keeping ignoring that point won't make it magically go away.

>See >>1422058
Well, thank you for establishing you do not read AGAIN!

Showing me transwomen winning competition doesn't establish they win them more than transmen, nor does this establish that they win them disproportionally.

It's not about me not liking the source, it's that what you provided fail to prove your point.

>And I accept that you're a worthless retard
I am not the one who fail to understand the anecdotal fallacy.

>And that's been demonstrated hundreds of times
Anecdotal events do not prove that.
>His article, along with several other articles him and others have posted, do show that
Anecdotal events do not prove that. Show me the ACTUAL SPORT STATS. Those are on official records.

>He's done more than you have.
Let me repeat this again: ANECDOTAL EVENTS DO NOT PROVE ANYTHING!

Are you going to keep ignoring that?

>Overwhelmingly more than transmen.
Source? No anecdotal events, please, Actual stats based on sport record. Olympic has more than 20 years on it. Go do your work, now.

>>1422149
>>1422151
Huh... That's some interesting fuckery going on with 4chan. Mods fix your god damn website.

>>1422152
Or scratch that. It wasn't a glitch in the website. It was you deleting your own post for some mysterious reason. But don't worry, I copied it (God bless Linux).

Your post:

>He's given you multiple examples.
Unable to comprehend that anecdotal events DOESN'T establish transwomen win more competation than trans men AS A WHOLE

You keeping ignoring that point won't make it magically go away.

>See >>1422058
Well, thank you for establishing you do not read AGAIN!

Showing me women winning competition doesn't establish they win them more than men, nor doe this establish that they win them disproportionally.

It's not about me not liking the source, it's that what you provided fail to prove your point.

>And I accept that you're a worthless retard
I am not the one who fail to understand the anecdotal fallacy.

>And that's been demonstrated hundreds of times
Anecdotal events do not prove that.
>His article, along with several other articles him and others have posted, do show that
Anecdotal events do not prove that. Show me the ACTUAL SPORT STATS. Those are on official records.

>He's done more than you have.
Let me repeat this again: ANECDOTAL EVENTS DO NOT PROVE ANYTHING!

Are you going to keep ignoring that?

>Overwhelmingly more than transmen.
Source? No anecdotal events, please, Actual stats based on sport record. Olympic has more than 20 years on it. Go do your work, now.

>>1421969
A list of scientific studies is not an opinion

>>1422153
>It was you deleting your own post for some mysterious reason.
Spelling mistakes and typos so I redid it.

>>1422150
>It does when he's given hundreds of examples and you haven't given one.
Actually, it doesn't. Whatever I would provide you would ALSO be anecdotal. To prove your claim that transwomen win more compeition than transmen, you have to back it up with ACTUAL STATS.

Sport result are on records, go to work.

>Until otherwise proven, he is correct and you are not.
Not how it works. Showing anecdotal events change nothing to begin with. He still hasn't demonstrated anything.

>>1422140
>That is not how it works
https://i.postimg.cc/cL2Y6MWB/trump-with-trans-gay-people.png
https://i.postimg.cc/9FGXbkcQ/trump-flag.png
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Guve7Y856kY
Works for Trump

>>1422164
Not the point.

>>1422166
It's rude to point

>>1422158
>Actually, it doesn't.
Actually it does.
>Not how it works.
Yup. Fuck off and don't come back until you can find an example that backs your losing argument up.

I told you already I'm not playing these games with you.

>>1422169
>Actually it does.
Learn what anecdotal fallacy is.

>until you can find an example
You are asking me to commit the same fallacy that you do for the sake of countering a point you failed to make in the first place.

You still AND WILL CONTINUE to get nothing until you make an real statistical analysis actually backing your stance in a significant way.

Until then you got nothing.