A prominent diddlecrat had a huge melty yesterday, when he found out that other diddlecrats were in favor or passing common sense legislation, he had a major melty, accusing them of being "complicit with trump"
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5426691-booker-democrats-trump/
Booker blows up at Democrats on Senate floor: ‘Willing to be complicit’ with Trump

Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) blew up at fellow Democratic Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto (Nev.) and Amy Klobuchar (Minn.) in a heated back-and-forth on the Senate floor Tuesday, accusing members of his party of being “willing to be complicit” with President Trump.

“This, to me, is a problem with Democrats in America right now, is we’re willing to be complicit to Donald Trump,” Booker, who is thought to be a potential candidate for president in 2028, thundered on the floor, arguing Democrats should use their “leverage” over proposals to boost funding for police to get Trump to release his hold on funding for Democratic states such as New Jersey, New York and California.

He said the Democratic Party needs a “wake-up call” and that some colleagues who are elected to defend the Constitution in Washington are willing to “look the other way” and let some blue states suffer as long as their states don’t get dinged as well.

The fireworks erupted after Cortez Masto tried to move a package of bills, including grants for police departments around the country, by unanimous consent on the Senate floor.

Booker objected to moving the package because he said the police grants would not go to his home state of New Jersey, nor to New York, California or Illinois, because Trump has frozen funding to the predominantly Democratic states.

He questioned Democratic colleagues for pushing the package “when we have all the leverage right now.”

“Don’t be complicit to the president of the United States,” he urged. " our president is eviscerating the Constitution of the United States of America"

>>1423243 (OP)
OP is still in the middle of their peodphile protecting meltie.

>police grants would not go to his home state of New Jersey, nor to New York, California or Illinois, because Trump has frozen funding to the predominantly Democratic states.
So Republicunts are angry now that Democrats are rightfully criticizing them for defunding the police

>>1423243 (OP)
The dem voter base is angry. People don't like watching their government being corrupted in real time.

Also, utterly valid to blow up at your fellows for letting some states get fucking singled out for punishment for standing up to the president. A non-corrupt government would have Trump impeached for shit like this. Even Biden gave red states that wanted him dead more funds because they needed them.

>>1423249
Aren't funds being witheld because they have official discriminatory policies, and funds will be released when they remove these discriminatory policies?

Seems fair.

>>1423250
>Aren't funds being witheld because they have official discriminatory policies, and funds will be released when they remove these discriminatory policies?
1. You're thinking of school fundings, and randomly changing rules to suit your political agenda and then accusing states of discrimination when they won't fuck over like 1% of their school population isn't gonna work.
2. Refusing states funding purely so they'll support or enact your policies is unconstitutional. What happened to the party of state's rights?

evil destroys things everything including itself. its madness. incompetence is literally a red flag for corruption or evil


AI Overview
The verse "evil shall slay the wicked" is found in Psalm 34:21. It speaks to the idea that wickedness ultimately leads to destruction for those who embrace it, and those who hate the righteous will be held accountable.
Here's a breakdown:
"Evil shall slay the wicked":
.
This part emphasizes that the wicked will be brought down by their own actions. The evil they harbor or perpetrate will be the instrument of their downfall.
"And those who hate the righteous shall be condemned":
.
This highlights the consequence for those who actively oppose or harbor hatred towards those who are righteous. Their actions will lead to a negative outcome, often interpreted as condemnation or punishment, according to some Bible translations.
Psalm 34:21 is part of a larger passage that contrasts the fate of the wicked with the protection God provides for the righteous. The verse serves as a warning against wickedness and a reminder of God's justice and protection.

>>1423252
>You're thinking of school fundings, and randomly changing rules to suit your political agenda and then accusing states of discrimination when they won't fuck over like 1% of their school population isn't gonna work.
No, I'm not thinking of your headcanon, I'm thinking of what the article reported as the cause:
>Trump signed an executive order Jan. 20 freezing all federal funding related to diversity, equity and inclusion

>>1423254
So you're going with your standard route of ignoring everything people say and charging forward with your proven wrong interpretation of things?
Its why everyone calls you a shill, because you're acting like one.

>>1423243 (OP)
>Trump gets caught on Epstein list
>blames democrats
Typical maga cultist trying to deflect

>>1423258
>ignoring everything people say
I'm going off what's written in the article. If you think this is because of something else you're going to need to provide evidence of your claim, until then it's your headcanon, and yes, I ignore headcanon

>>1423243 (OP)
Check out how much AIPAC have donated to Corey Booger

>>1423266
Why?

>>1423268
Because just like your beloved recucklican zogbots, he is a servant of the transnational imperialist and zionist ruling class. I know you have never been within 50 feet of academics on the matter, so just get on with your /pol/ tier trolling and shilling. Not like I am going to read it. Anyways, enjoy your internship at Turning Point or whatever the fuck cuckservative group has free reign over your butt hole

>>1423272
Been a moment since I've seen a Chernobyl-tier melty that's so short

>>1423254
>>Trump signed an executive order Jan. 20 freezing all federal funding related to diversity, equity and inclusion
So why is this freezing funding for cops?

Also, good luck suing for "discriminatory policies" when you're literally getting rid of anti-discrimination policies.

>>1423263
Republicans defunding the police is the article.
stop smoking fent

>>1423243 (OP)
Do you condemn Republican pedos too, OP?
https://goppredators.wordpress.com
If you don't, you condone what they do.
If you don't condemn the Gang Of Pedophiles and their orange Pedo-in-Chief, the only thing in /news/ having a melty will be you. I condemn pedos on both sides, and would be all for throwing Bill Clinton under the bus. Do you condemn the Republicans being riddled with degenerates and want to see Trump politically destroyed, OP?
Now watch the OP have a melty by saying anything other than 'I condemn the Republicans being full of pedos, and would like to see the entire GOP politically destroyed, along with pedo Trump'.

>>1423277
>Republicans defunding the police is the article.
>stop smoking fent
Ok I just checked the article. It's about both Republicans and Democrats trying to fund the police and Cory Booker having a melty that police were being funded
"The fireworks erupted after Cortez Masto tried to move a package of bills, including grants for police departments around the country, by unanimous consent on the Senate floor."

Stop smoking fentanyl retard

>>1423276
>So why is this freezing funding for cops
I have no idea. It has nothing to do with freezing funding for cops, >>1423277 needs to stop smoking fentanyl

>>1423276
>discriminatory policies" when you're literally getting rid of anti-discrimination policies.
prioritizing demographic characteristics over experience or skill disadvantages qualified individuals from non‑targeted groups.
It's discriminatory

>>1423299
>>1423300
Did you skim this article too?
>Booker objected to moving the package because he said the police grants would not go to his home state of New Jersey, nor to New York, California or Illinois, because Trump has frozen funding to the predominantly Democratic states.
Its objectively about Republicunts defunding the police in Democratic states.
Why do you need to compulsively lie? compulsively

What is worse, not believing God and despising the Antichrist or believing God but following the Antichrist?

>>1423301
>I don't understand how DEI works
All it does is ensure the most qualified people from all races are hired instead of just scaling on white people. It's the opposite of discriminatory you fucking retard; it isn't that you didn't get the job because you're white. It's because a minority was better qualified at it than you are. Colorblindness isn't equality.

>>1423303
Maybe they should just repeal their discriminatory practices so that that get funded
Idk just a thought

>>1423309
>All it does is ensure the most qualified people from all races are hired instead of just scaling on white people
If this were true then why is demographic information asked for? If what you said were actually true, then demographic information would be irrelevant and uninvolved
Checkmate

>>1423304
Why not both?

>>1423309
>All it does is ensure the most qualified people from all races are hired instead of just scaling on white people.
Here's A very relevant example, from New Jersey no less:
https://www.nj.gov/treasury/diversity/about.shtml
"...to increase the utilization of minority and women-owned businesses in the state contracting process.... As a result, greater utilization of MWBE’s (minority and women owned business enterprises) in state procurement can be achieved"

So they have programs for the express purpose of giving government contracts to businesses based on the ethnicity or sex of whoever runs the business.
That's nothing to do with ensuring the best worker or the best bidder gets the job, that has everything to do with ensuring specific businesses get jobs because of the owner's identity.

You can't refute this. It's fact.

>>1423321
>So they have programs for the express purpose of giving government contracts to businesses based on the ethnicity or sex of whoever runs the business.
Because they're otherwise discriminated against you fucking retard. Do you not get how systemic discrimination works?

>Fuck over minority owned businesses for years
>They never get contracts because they got fucked over
>Finally give them contracts to try and bridge the gap and give them a fair chance to compete
>"Hey why are you prioritizing them and discriminating against me!"

>>1423322
You know, when I saw this article I thought to myself "anon is really going to have to pull of some mental gymnastics to refute this, it clearly states they have programs that train state employees to favor giving contracts to businesses owned by women and minority groups, which is clearly contrary to anons claim that dei is demographic-blind and meritocratic"

But I was wrong, you came at me with "we need to discriminate to stop discrimination"

Clearly mental gymnastics anon, I give you 7/5 points

>>1423322
>why are you prioritizing them
Why indeed, anon. Why are you prioritizing people based on their skin color? You just btfo yourself and your previous claim that dei is all merit based.

Fuck off, racist.

>>1423325
Not even him but you seem to be casually ignoring and discarding 400 years of white racism which is why we're in this mess to start.

>>1423327
This is what you deserve.

When I was young I learned that two wrongs don't make a right.
When Democrats were young they apparently learned the opposite since they believe that a wrong should be corrected by wronging someone else in return.

Personally I'd just prefer that all the discriminatory practices and identity-based decisions stop altogether, but that's just me

>>1423330
>Does this
>"hmm why are all these minority owned businesses not getting contracts and all the higher ups are overwhelmingly white? Must be because white people are just better her dur!"
Nothing exists in a vacuum and you can't just declare systemic equality solved.

>>1423321
>So they have programs for the express purpose of giving government contracts to businesses based on the ethnicity or sex of whoever runs the business.
>That's nothing to do with ensuring the best worker or the best bidder gets the job, that has everything to do with ensuring specific businesses get jobs because of the owner's identity.
>
>You can't refute this. It's fact.
Its not a fact, its your schizo headcanon after reading an about article on a site. You literally have no idea what their selection criteria is.

>>1423336
Your strawmen don't work here

>>1423337
>You literally have no idea what their selection criteria is.
It doesn't matter if their selection criteria is praying to George Floyd, turning around 3 full turns and then throwing a dart at a wall. Their stated goal is to award contracts based on the business owners ethnic or sexual identity. It's discriminatory.

>>1423339
>only my strawman works here
cool story, faggot

>>1423340
Equalizing playing fields isn't discriminatory. What's discriminatory is minority owned businesses getting contracts at a much lower rate then they should simply because they're minority owned.

>>1423342
They don't give a shit, they're midwit logic stops at 'minority owned businesses are disproportionately benefiting so obviously there's a bias'

The NJ DEI office link they booked is literally that, just working to connect more small businesses for supply contracts instead of relying on a few large vendors.
So of course corporate owned shills are arguing against it so they can keep their contracts and starve out small businesses, and they can fool gullible morons like the local shill into arguing for them by reframing it into a racist argument.

>>1423344
It's a simple problem to parse.
If you're giving benefits to one group based on ethnicity, then you're necessarily depriving someone else access to those benefits based on ethnicity.
DEI isn't pro-equality, it's anti-white, because it comes at the problem of social inequality by immediately assuming that non-minorities businesses are inherently privileged based off the idea of class warfare as applied to racial demographics.
Wokescold retards don't understand that once you start factoring race into the selection process for aid, you immediately sort everybody into a Shirts vs Skins conflict based on immutable characteristics.
Wokescolds also don't understand that race is very real and impacts behavior, which also impacts economic outcomes. But they're not ready to have that conversation yet.

>>1423342
>minority owned businesses getting contracts at a much lower rate then they should simply because they're minority owned.
First of all, I challenge you to prove this claim is/was true in new Jersey and it isn't just one of your favorite talking points uses to justify your discrimination

Second of all, and most of all, I challenge you to prove that any difference in outcome is actually due to the business owners ethnicity and not other factors such as other businesses simply being better/less expensive

Pro top: you can't and you're promoting a culture of discrimination

>>1423349
Good post

>>1423357
oops meant for >>1423356

>>1423349
>If you're giving benefits to one group based on ethnicity, then you're necessarily depriving someone else access to those benefits based on ethnicity.
And since this is schizo nonsense you made up to discredit DEI instead of anything that DEI is about, the rest of what you said is bullshit and you're completely wrong.
I'll accept your concession

>>1423357
why do you always expose yourself like this, samefag

>>1423359
>And since this is schizo nonsense you made up to discredit DEI instead of anything that DEI is about
It's called positive discrimination retard. They're giving preferential treatment based on ethnicity and calling it equality. This is actually illegal in most democratic countries.

>>1423361
>>1423359
>>1423358
Well that's definitely a tantrum.
Care to address any of the posts, or you just want to continue your melty?

>>1423363
Do you often respond to multiple posts at random and accuse them of having tantrums?

>>1423363
trump is trying to cover up his epstein ties, anyways, back to your damage control

>>1423362
>They're giving preferential treatment based on ethnicity and calling it equality.
They're not, and you can't prove it, but feel free to keep getting angry at something that isn't happening.

>>1423363
Go celebrate your victory with your usual tranny gooning sesh.
You can stop posting today

>>1423366
>They're not, and you can't prove it
Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard

>>1423364
They can't win with logic or facts, so all they have is flipping the board and pretending they won

>>1423366
>They're not, and you can't prove it,
I absolutely can prove it in the context of the op discussion.
This entire page is dedicated to discussing how the state of New Jersey is implementing policies that identify businesses based on the ethnicity of the owner and award them state contracts:
https://www.nj.gov/treasury/diversity/about.shtml

Literally *the only* reason you don't consider this discriminatory is because the ethnicity of who benefits from this, you think it's good that it's discriminating against men and white people.

lmao, the retard is doubling down on using an 'about' page as proof

>>1423367
>Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard
Truke.

>>1423370
It btfo's you retards. Literally all you have are your opinions and melties.
Want to just provide another baseless wild claim? Or is it about the time you call both of us esl as usual when you get repeatedly btfo

>>1423372
You literally have no idea what you're talking about, and are raging about some slop text an intern put up instead of any actual policies or acts.
You're beating yourself up, I didn't do anything

>>1423373
he'll say anything to cover up his pedo daddy

>>1423373
Aiming to increase the use of women- and minority-owned businesses isn't inherently racist against white people. It typically stems from efforts to address historical disparities in access to opportunities, contracts, or resources, which data shows have disproportionately favored white-owned businesses. For example, in the U.S., minority-owned firms make up about 19% of businesses but receive less than 10% of federal contract dollars, per SBA reports. Policies targeting these groups aim to level the playing field, not exclude others.
That said, critics argue such initiatives can sometimes prioritize group identity over merit, potentially sidelining qualified white-owned businesses. If poorly implemented—say, with rigid quotas or exclusionary practices—they could be seen as discriminatory. The legal standard, per U.S. case law like Grutter v. Bollinger, is that affirmative action must be narrowly tailored to avoid reverse discrimination.
Intent and execution matter. If the goal is inclusion and correcting imbalances, it’s not racist. If it explicitly excludes or penalizes white-owned businesses based solely on race, it could cross that line. Context-specific details, like the policy’s design or local demographics, would need closer scrutiny to settle the question definitively.

So yeah, the racist shill is full of shit, and probably just distracting from Trump admitting to running a child sex trafficking ring and fucking minors with Epstein

>>1423373
>Guys, the website the stateof New Jersey put up detailing how their policies are systemic discrimination are totally fake, mmkay?
Lol
Nice L, faggo

>>1423377
you're lucky we even exchange words with you, village idiot

>detailing
shill is making up things to be angry at again
Next he'll be claiming the NJ Treasury is rioting and burning local businesses

>>1423373
>>1423370
Consider the level of cognitive dissonance required for your current position.
You have been unable to articulate why a page, which at face value, is describing a discriminatory contract award system that favors "women and minority" business owners over other business owners, and in between name calling, your one attempt to justify this policy which describes discrimination based upon ethnicity, your only actual argument is "the person who wrote the page is new and doesn't know what they are talking about

>>1423381
>a page, which at face value, is describing a discriminatory contract award system that favors "women and minority" business owners over other business owners
Can you link it? You can't just talk about a different page that hasn't come up

>>1423384
How about you read the thread? Start here >>1423373

>>1423385
That doesn't link to a thread either.
All you have is that NJ treasury page, and that doesn't say what you claim either.
So what are you talking about? I can't see your delusions, and I don't have your mental illness, so you need to use words.

>>1423381
no one cares faggot, you've lost the argument several times. trump+epstein bffs forever

>>1423387
>>1423386
You've lost, you can't articulate why discriminating in favor of "women and minorities" isn't discrimination, and new Jersey won't get Federal funding until they stop their official discrimination policies.

>>1423388
oh no, i lost because i can't explain how something that isn't happening is causing something else that isn't happening
guess you win and can go back to rddit and have another tranny goon sesh, good for you

>>1423388
i don't even argue with you, faggot. i'm the person here to make fun of your objectively wrong opinions without even engaging them

>>1423388
It's not discrimination that first place doesn't get the blue shell.

>>1423243 (OP)
All they have to do is repeal their pro discrimination policies and they will get Federal funding again

>>1423451
So they'll never get funding again because Republicunts are expecting them to repeal a policy that doesn't exist.

>>1423452
They have an entire department dedicated to discriminating
https://www.njoag.gov/about/divisions-and-offices/diversity-inclusion/

>>1423452
I mean, wow anon, you are bad at gaslighting
https://www.shorenewsnetwork.com/2025/04/13/new-jersey-dems-pushing-dei-mandate-to-all-state-agencies-despite-white-house-threat-for-funding-cuts/

>>1423453
>>1423454
So you're just going to have a melty and ragepost on cooldown instead of showing they have discriminatory polices?
Sounds like I already know there isn't any mentioned in either link, and you're just being a lying retard getting angry at nothing because you were ordered to.

Democrats be like: https://youtu.be/Dek5HtNdIHY

>>1423548
>be like
>like
>>1423548 likes Democrats, or would never use the word 'like' in that way

>>1423603
..what?

>>1423622
>what?
>>1423622 has no reading comprehension and is illiterate.

>>1423633
I dont understand schizobabble, sorry

>>1423643
>I dont understand schizobabble
>be like
>like
thus >>1423548's post

>>1423548
As a life long Democrat, I hate that I sound like this when I justify DEI

>>1423667
You aren't fooling anyone.

>>1423252
Dems randomly changed the rules of what was appropriate in classrooms and decided that sexuality was a great focus for little children, most of the US is not happy with it and it is led to a line in sand. All they have to do is comply with the executive orders and they get their money. So they can shut the fuck up and get in line or get fucked.

>>1423708
>what we now know about the GOP: Gang Of Pedophiles
>Repubs randomly changed the rules of what was appropriate in classrooms and decided that sexuality was a great focus for little children, most of the US is not happy with it and it led to a line in the sand
ftfy
>it is led to a line in sand
esl

>>1423243 (OP)
A prominent diddlepublican in /news/ will have a huge melty, when he finds out that his Diddlepublican-in-Chief thus he are in favor of what they would call a 'common sense' appointment to the White House, he'll have a major melty, being a hypocrite projecting more than IMAX, accusing others of being 'diddlers', despite he being "complicit with trump"
>>1423710
That aged well for the OP.

>>1423708
>Dems randomly changed the rules of what was appropriate in classrooms and decided that sexuality was a great focus for little children
No, they didn't. ,You have been fooled by propaganda and I think you are fully welcoming being tricked.

>>1423708
Party of states rights everyone.

Funny you bring up sex education when this isn't even about that; you just want trans people to be miserable and you'll fuck over the entire state if you aren't allowed to fuck them over.

>>1423667
Same here. I've been voting blue my entire life, and its frustrating how every time I try to explain dei to my friends I emd up sounding like >>1423548

Is there a better way we can explain this?

>>1423736
>Party of states rights everyone.
>coming from the party that said fuck Texas's states' rights when Biden was in charge

>>1423741
>>1423667
Wow. As a Hillary and three-time Biden voter, this really resonates with me. The person in that YouTube video sounded literally like me, I get that same reaction all the time when I try to explain dei

>>1423736
>Funny you bring up sex education when this isn't even about that;
Nta, but you people bring up chromosomal abnormalities all the time when people point out that men are men even when they dress like a woman, despite that not having anything to do with the discussion

>>1423736
>you just want trans people to be miserable
I have no negative feelings towards trans people. They are free to dress and act however they want, however I believe that sports and intimate facilities should be segregated by biology. Because other people make you uncomfortable when you change clothes isn't a reason why you should be allowed to make other people uncomfortable changing clothes. Quite the contrary, I have no desire to make trans people feel miserable, I have the desire that they adapt to the same society we all live in together (as we all have done) instead of expecting society to change for them.

Local shill must be thanking God that Trump folded like a lawnchair on his August 1st tarriff deadlines. Now instead of having to create a bunch of shill threads about how Trump is great for fucking over America by raising taxes, they instead get to keep shitposting about trannies

Trump fucking kids and being a spineless coward is the best thing that happened to them all summer.

>>1423747
>Trump folded like a lawnchair on his August 1st tarriff deadlines
Did he? The beeb calls it a victory
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0l6g13rlwko

>>1423748
>None of the deals are finalized
>"Investment" basically just amounts to recommending companies do business with the US (likely not gonna happen)
>Extended another 90 days on Mexico, straight up going to trade war with Canada
>Even counting the non-finalized deals it's maybe 10 instead of 90 even after having given himself an extra month.

A yep

>>1423746
>I have no negative feelings towards trans people. They are free to dress and act however they want, however
>however
>I'm not racist, but...
>I'm not misogynistic, but...
>I'm not antisemitic, but...
>I'm not homophobic, but...
Me, I have no negative feelings towards trans people. They are free to dress and act however they want.
So what's your excuse for going beyond 'They are free to dress and act however they want'?