Who is the worst car reviewer and why is it this retard?

never watched him. disregard the algorithm.

>>28448103 (OP)
Almost all of them are the same shit. They're basically given a script and list of features of every little bingbong switch and door pocket and they spend 15 minutes of the 20 min video talking about all that shit, and reading literal marketing blurbs about how the car has XTremeSound Ultraimmersion technology without giving an actual fuck of what that means. They also do scummy shit like reviewing the top spec while talking about how affordable the bottom spec is, which doesn't have half the features.

Actually talking about how the car drives and what it's like to own one is crammed into like a 3 minute segment at the end of the video.

Can't even be specifically mad at this guy, since all of them are literally the same shit, this guy is just somehow more popular.

>>28448103 (OP)
idk hes pretty good from what i have seen. wouldnt take his opinions too seriously still. hes ill give him that

>>28448191
>ill
still funny*

>>28448103 (OP)
>watching car reviewers at all
If you aren't going to buy a car, why are you watching a review about it? And if you are going to buy the car, then test drive it for yourself. ALL car reviewers are gay shill retards and wasting any time watching their content is stupid.

>>28448103 (OP)
I have a strong distaste for Matt Farah. I never forgave him for passing off a fake, Datsun-based Ferrari 250 GTO as the real thing, going so far as to sperg out in the comments at anyone trying to correct him.
That's just one thing however, the rest of the time he gives off this wannabe yuppie, new-money richfag type of vibe, especially when he wants to shill shit like watches as if he knows anything about them. I just can't take anything else he says seriously based off those things alone.
Modern RCR is definitely worthy of that title as well, one can debate if the reviews were ever "good", edgy maybe, but they sure as hell are awful now.

>>28448211
Fatt Marah has a pearl jam tattoo on his forearm. That should tell you all you need to know about him.

James Martin (JayEmm) and that tweed-wearing dude (Joseph Lloyd) have decent takes.

>>28449077
I'm getting older, so JayEmm and Chris Harris are to my taste. Harry Metcalfe is alright too, but rather out of touch.

>>28448192
That's why he gets the #2 spot.

Doug still gets #1 for the top comment that pissed me off: "The PRNDL stick is dead and paddles are the best".

Just walk away Doug. Just walk away.

Hey guys. Matt Watson here from carw*w

the tranny
i never watched her though

>>28449090
doug "reviews" cars by waving the camera around them and reading off the specs. He doesnt actually know anything about cars or driving

>>28448103 (OP)
Balding, gay, Filipino reviewers are the best!!

>>28451478
but that's what you watch his video for. i don't really care about the track performance capabilities of a new $250k Maybach SUV or a 30 year old Oldsmobile Bravada. i just want to know about their, y'know... quirks and features.

>>28449077
Jay emm is pretty good. He’s rich so he doesn’t have sour grapes, he has rich friends and socialize in real life so he knows actual owners and interviews them to get real perspective on owning.
He’s slightly into top gear poetry reviews and he doesn’t track so his view is ultimately vibe based but I still think he’s giving real insight. He also trashed the Q4 despite Audi providing it.

>>28451478
He literally reads Wikipedia articles and drives up the on-ramp before announcing extremely ignorant general knowledge.
>this Audi understeers
>this Caymen handles perfect
>this corvette is good but it’s not a super car like handling
Pure meaningless statements. You can’t feel understeer on a public road going 20 mon

>>28451612
Doug doesnt know any of the actual quirks and features since he has never so much as popped the hood on any of these vehicles. I guess you are referring to electronic gimmicks? Actual women on /o/????

>>28448103 (OP)
why the fuck would anyone even watch car reviewers?

>>28451688
you know the expression "use the right tool for the job"? you don't watch a doug video for an autistic engine breakdown. there's other channels for that. you watch doug to get a general overview of the entire car. it's like doing a test drive at a dealership. you're not going to learn things like the bore of the cylinders or the final drive ratio. there's other places to go for that information.

>>28448211
>new-money richfag type of vibe
He doesn't give off that vibe he is that.
All of his success started with Daddy's money.
Atleast the AMMO clean guy used his own money to start his car cleaning business

>>28448103 (OP)
The two basedboys are the worst

>>28449090
I don't really care about his thoughts and feelings on cars. But I do like how he goes in depth with the ins and outs of it.

>>28451488
He has a white husband fwiw

>>28449090
When he started using a chair I genuinely thought he had lost the use of his legs. Nah, he's just that lazy.
Previously his laziness only extended to finding a "quirk" in the car, and not looking up why it was there - choosing to go "Wow! This is so stupid and weird!" instead of doing the tiniest bit of research.

>>28449158
>her
b8

/o/pinions?

>>28452352
i wont ever watch one of his vids because of his fat face filling the entire frame of every thumbnail. Brits are usually awful car reviewers anyway

>>28452352
One of the best right now.