>>28460340>because you cant put a number on how the car feelsI have no idea what you are talking about
the guy(s) who wrote the article drove all these cars and they back up their claims that the M3 is a slushbox like the vette (which is a boomer car) with numbers after they drove it.
I am going to call BULLSHIT on a claim that a viper GTS has worse handling than a fucking E36 M3 on MacDogshit
and of course I am going to call BULLSHIT on retards telling me that there's any chance an E36 M3 feels better than a viper GTS
I am mentioning the viper because of this BS here
>>28460279which is not only another instace of "It was real in my mind" without any data to back it up, but also it's an ad.
...and I know for a fact that these E36 M3 are dogshit, because 9/10 aftermarket parts make the car handle worse and you can't tune it better than the factory, which as I said above have 3-4 frequent failure points.
I am not going into the usual BMW problems with oil and magnesium sleeves, but the suspenion is something the car cannot be improved upon.
...and this is not the first time we say this on BMW halo cars. The Z3 and the clownshoe had a rear suspension of the E30, which is another dogshit car and it also had warping problems with the 3.0 engine and you had to reinforce the subframe with a welded frame.
I don't know why you t*rks get so defensive when it's proven that bmw made and still makes garbage moving known problems from one model to another and known design flaws from one decade to another. (I guess with the e30 and the z3 that's 2 decades later)
I guess you want use to forget what we know about cars and pretend that a fucking m3 is better than a viper gts.
/o/ is not your hugbox.