>>28461739They've always been fake. Every last one.
>>28461758Every IQ thread ever made on this website has always had the same (type of) people posting scores. Tards who've done stupid online tests 100 times and put up 120-140, tards who just pull up the answer lists and go
>its off the scale broTards who take them seriously and go
>idk what 109 means is that good?Tards who just randopick every question and post an 87 or something,
And tards who dont post a score at all.
I mean aside from the fact the iq threads are botted/people posting the same pics from over a decade ago.
Fun fact Raven's Progressive Matrices are weighted for 15 year olds and use a 16pt standard deviation, so if youre a grown man whos never done it before, and score a legitimate 130 it's really a 124 or somm'err round there.