>>28461739
They've always been fake. Every last one.
>>28461758
Every IQ thread ever made on this website has always had the same (type of) people posting scores. Tards who've done stupid online tests 100 times and put up 120-140, tards who just pull up the answer lists and go
>its off the scale bro
Tards who take them seriously and go
>idk what 109 means is that good?
Tards who just randopick every question and post an 87 or something,
And tards who dont post a score at all.
I mean aside from the fact the iq threads are botted/people posting the same pics from over a decade ago.
Fun fact Raven's Progressive Matrices are weighted for 15 year olds and use a 16pt standard deviation, so if youre a grown man whos never done it before, and score a legitimate 130 it's really a 124 or somm'err round there.