>front left
>front middle
>front right
>rear left
>rear right
For me it’s front right since I’m driving nose first into a parking sport and the driving side is on the right in my country.

The badges on the front/rear fender should open up to reveal the charging port. Either that or the rear fender is ideal

behind the loicense plate

>supposed to be better than ice in every way
>Still retains single "fill port" design
>Despite being a commodity plug with a few feet of wire that can be routed anywhere

Where it doesn't freeze shut.

>>28479946 (OP)
Front right/left.

>>28479946 (OP)
Middle seems the obvious choice to me. Does anyone do top middle?

>>28479946 (OP)
Wherever is easiest to fill with glue.

Go back to /n/

>>28479946 (OP)
it's sure as hell isn't rear left like it is on Teslas, at least not in LHD countries. Cables aren't hoses, you can't just make them longer, you have to make them longer AND thicker, and copper is expensive as fuck. Teslas' retardation alone forces those cables to be 2x the length and 3x the cost on parallel parking charger spots because they have to go all the way around the car for some retarded reason. Everyone else has it figured out, it's at worst in the middle to compromise between LHD and RHD models, but Tesla is stubborn, and understandably so since they have their own supercharger network where you exclusively back into spots.

Back passenger for me. If your garage is smaller then you can charge without creating a tripping hazard. And I've never seen one but if we ever get to a point where there's roadside charging points then obviously the port would need to be on the passenger side.

>>28480033
>urbanite in their trendy (kinda gay) EV runs out of science pixies
>stop at local coop to get a onions latte and charge the cute little honda
>top middle just pull in and start juicing!
>oh no its raining because thats what being outside is!
>water pools into charging port and sets car on fire
I agree with you otherwise that anywhere in the middle front or back is ideal because public chargers will filter the averagest of NPCs just like fuel pumps needing to be on the correct side destroys the female brain.

>>28479946 (OP)
Slap that shit front and center so all the retards know where it is and their charging cables can reach.

>>28480199
Do you think with it being front and center would too much road grime, rain, and other shit get below the door and fuck up the connectors?

Putting it in the rear also makes sense but you just know too many retards would complain about backing into a space or garage which is why so many EVs have it in a traditional gas nozzle location.

Lamborghini solved this. Just put the port inside the frunk.

>>28479946 (OP)
I'd like a charge port on the front and the rear so I could have the option of nose in or backing in, instead of being forced to pick one. Especially since angled parking like this is popular near me and someone with a rear charging port would have to back in against the flow of traffic to charge.

>>28480210
>Hood up like a broken down car on the side of the road

Fuckin kek.

>>28480210
>must empty any valuables while charging in public else nogs can yoink anything left in your cargo area
Yes great design

>>28480203
They're all gasketed anyway, it shouldn't be a problem wherever it is.

>>28480218
>Worrying about "valuables" in your $500,000 car
>parking in places where undesirables are even welcome
>public charging your super car
Do you think Rolls Royces have a button to lower the antenna before entering a local gas station car wash?

>>28480241
You're probably right, I don't like the idea of a rubber gasket being tasked to protect an expensive part when you could just put it in a better spot. Then again, EVs are disposable and junked after 15 years anyway so why not.

>>28480210
>front empty
Soulless money slop

>>28480246
They should have the button from the first Michael Keaton Batman movie where the whole car gets armored.

>>28480246
>Worrying about "valuables" in your $500,000 car
richfags don't get rich by unnecessarily pissing money away replacing shit that got stolen
>parking in places where undesirables are even welcome
>implying being unwelcome stops them
>public charging your super car
yes some people actually drive their supercars
>Do you think Rolls Royces have a button to lower the antenna before entering a local gas station car wash?
literally yes (#10)

>>28480246
>Do you think Rolls Royces have a button to lower the antenna
shit example because rolls royce literally have a feature that sucks the little hood ornament back into the car if it thinks someone is trying to steal it

>>28480252
>richfags don't get rich by unnecessarily pissing money away replacing shit that got stolen
They also didn't get rich buying $500k cars that depreciate by 15% per year.
>yes some people actually drive their supercars
Odd, they're not buying EV supercars so whats your point? Ferarri deleted their EVs, Rimacs are sold to arab oil shieks, and I don't think anyone else bothered making one.
>literally yes (#10)
Oh yeah, Billionaires really love 50+ year old super luxury cars that require insane amounts of expensive maintenance. Great example.

>>28480273
Its not for theft protection, Jeremy. Its about wealthy people having class, when its appropriate you lower the Spirit of Ecstasy so as to avoid appearing ostentatious around the poors. You raise it to let your other wealthy pals at the country club you're aware of who you are.

>>28480281
Then why did you reply with an example that literally no rolls royce of the last 30 years would even have in the first place? No shit a power antenna would be a feature you'd find on an old one.

>>28480294
Because I'm pointing out to you, through sattire, that ultra-wealthy people driving really expensive cars don't do the same shit normal people do.

>>28480306
>i-it's satire bro
no it was a shit example

>>28480281
you don't even know what you're talking about. it's not a button you push when you decide to raise it or lower it. its built into the car. if you grab the ornament it automatically retracts itself. it's literally theft protection.

>>28480308
>I don't understand subtlty or sattire
We know.
>>28480310
So the owner has to grab the Spirit of Ecstasy to lower it? Are you sure? Thats gotta be hard if their GPS tells them to turn onto MLK Jr. Boulevard.

>>28480355
see
>>28480308

>>28479946 (OP)
Nowhere because it's not a car no go back >>>/n/

>>28480355
oh are you doing that thing where you realized you were wrong about something but instead of just accepting it and learning and maturing you instead double down on being retarded and pretend like that was what you were doing from the very beginning?

>>28480418
No, I'm calling you an idiot for not realizing how stupid your argument was. Here you are trying to pull the smug card and keep instigating instead of just moving on not realizing A. There is a button because it'd be moronic not to have a button, and B. you have no idea what wealthy people do because you're an idiot.

>>28480426
does this look like pushing a button to you? did this man push a button?

>>28479946 (OP)
ENTER

>>28479946 (OP)
Where the hood latch is on a gas car. Alternatively where the trunk latch would be.

>>28479946 (OP)
my vote is ANUS because only FAGGOTS drive these pieces of shit.
FUCK OFF back to /n/ FAGGOT
this post has seasoned the thread.

>>28479946 (OP)
The asshole since only fags want ev

>>28479946 (OP)
Going off this topic, for gas tank fill spots is there any location that even reaches the perfection of the left rear quarter?

>>28479987
It's more efficient to have chargers (and gas pump) between parking spaces if you had them front to back you couldn't drive in and out
They figured this out over 100 years ago with roadside pumps

>>28483331
Extra long hoses do both rear corners. Sainsbury (supermarket) hits the spot for me. Spicy gas and booze in the little shop too.

>>28480033
Front/rear gets hit a lot, so its bad design to have them there.